Jump to content

England vs Senegal, Round of 16. 7PM GMT, Al Bayt Stadium


Darius1998
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 493
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

7 minutes ago, Bootador said:

France haven't been that good in the tournament, just Mbappe has been immense. It's a tough game, but I fancy us with Walker in the team.

I'd say you've been pretty similar.

Questionable at the back, lack of creativity in midfield and immense talent up front. With England's talent being spread out, but Mbappe being the best player of the bunch.

And both teams have managers that will surely think about not conceding first and foremost, so we'll probably be robbed of an all-time classic and witness some cagey affair that gets decided with one goal unless someone scores early.

I actually think that England has more firepower and can win a game with lots of goals, but if it's just one goal, France is more likely to produce it.

Edited by GunmaN1905
Link to post
Share on other sites

Difficult to judge that, but glad it wasn't as nervy as I expected.

Obviously, those two chances for Senegal weren't great but it was dreadful loss of possession and not due to the opposition breaking us down. But Senegal were a bit like they were against Holland, made a game of it in the middle of the pitch but never really looked like creating an opening. Bellingham was everywhere in the first 15 minutes, then obviously did well for the goals, it's so useful having a player who can carry the ball past a man when we are so static as it opens stuff up. Unsurprisingly, we looked better when the opposition had to commit players forward, and once the game was won we played sensibly and never looked like conceding.

Predicted media treatment of France over the week:
France are amazing and the favourites
We have a chance if we can keep Mbappe quiet
Actually, France playing on the front foot plays into our hands with our attacking options and Poland showed they can be got at
Oh well we could never compete with their front three and we've clearly lost to the best team in the tournament.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GunmaN1905 said:

I'd say you've been pretty similar.

Questionable at the back, lack of creativity in midfield and immense talent up front. With England's talent being spread out, but Mbappe being the best player of the bunch.

And both teams have managers that will surely think about not conceding first and foremost, so we'll probably be robbed of an all-time classic and witness some cagey affair that gets decided with one goal unless someone scores early.

I actually think that England has more firepower and can win a game with lots of goals, but if it's just one goal, France is more likely to produce it.

Think that's a pretty fair assessment really.

1 minute ago, Smallen said:

Gabriel Clarke is a **** isn’t he

What's the ***** said?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that was lovely. Really really lovely :)

Per usual after game I'm drunk so I might be wrong with my thoughts/spelling. Bellingham was amazing. Everywhere. Got Beckham Greece vibes tonight. He was popping up everywhere. Fantastic performance. 

Kane too I thought, after his goal, was superb. That's the Kane we need. Drop deep when he has too but was still getting in box when he needed too. Loved his performance. And his finish wasn't an easy one. Well taken.

It took 3 games and 88 minutes but I finally heard the Atomic Kitten Southagte song in the pub. Wonderful.

Maguire scares me for France, but will worry about that next week. Gonna just enjoy tonight first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Bootador said:

Rice has to play sadly, Phillips isn't ready and Henderson isn't a pure DM as you know.

If it's 343, you don't really need a 6, although, Rice looks a lot better as part of a two, than a lone 6, so maybe it's a non-issue. That looks a real vulnerability, if you play 433, against a side good enough going forward to take advantage though. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Barry Cartman said:

More bizarre how in a lot of these threads Utd fans are complaining about their players not starting considering how **** they've been for years 

More bizarre how you'd conclude this when we've been more likely to complain about one of the two United players starting! Think this forum had as many Leeds fans as United fans who would have started Rashford, and not because there are more Leeds fans...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rice will be fine if Bellingham comes deep to offer an option that can carry the ball forward or play one twos a bit more often. Not coincidence that when Bellingham's been on the ball we've looked fantastic, and when he's been the other side of a press our midfield has looked missing (first 30 minutes today, USA game until he was subbed off). Bellingham seems like a guy that learns quickly though, which is handy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Astafjevs said:

Rice isn't a player who can operate at the base, as the 'pivot', or whatever you want to call the role. Wasn't great there vs. Wales and he's not playing well there now. It's one of the big reasons why England's buildup has been so bad. Central defenders having to ignore him. 

Unfortunately I don't think England have an alternative 

 

Phillips is much better at moving the ball out from defence into midfield compared to Rice. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phone died, along with my voice, but that was brilliant fun! The 2nd half was a bit drab after our 3rd but the atmosphere was brilliant. The Senegal band and the fans in the body paint didn't stop dancing for the entire match, shame they couldn't grab a goal at the end to give them something to cheer about.

Bellingham is a monster in midfield and Saka was back to his best. None of the other players were really tested, seemed a pretty routine from where I was sat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, enigmatic said:

More bizarre how you'd conclude this when we've been more likely to complain about one of the two United players starting! Think this forum had as many Leeds fans as United fans who would have started Rashford, and not because there are more Leeds fans...

 

It's Barry, enough said. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think Phillips is better than Rice at progressing the ball like that.

It's just a general weakness in England's midfield and what they have available. Bellingham and Rice are great at progressing the ball with carries, but when one has to play as the pivot and progress it with passing, they can't do it. There's no-one available who can from what I see. One of the problems they've had for years, probably since Carrick, that other teams don't suffer from. They need a Rodri/Tchouaméni/Jorginho/Enzo Fernandez type. Or even a different type of number 6/8 that can do it - Verratti, Pedri, Modric etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Barry Cartman said:

Fear with Walker on Saturday is like against Real Madrid he's dead after 70 minutes and then we go to **** when he goes off knackered 

I feel like that's a false narrative because, 1. Wasn't he half fit? 2. he put all his eggs into the sprints and roughly came out on top, but what he did with the ball and being in position was not a priority that night; they almost scored multiple times from his position or from him giving it away. The last minute implosion was just ridiculous.

He needs to start against Mbappe though, as much as I think that Trippier is better defensively, Walker is the only one who can keep up with him when Mbappe knocks it past you. The only problem may be that France will play higher up in Englands territory than Senegal did, so if Mbappe does to Walker even once, what Sarr did 3/4 times yesterday, it could be game over. I think it'll be a tight, cagey match though. Henderson and Walker should be enough to cover Mbappe with Rice blocking 1-2's.

We forget that Dembele is an absolute player too. I do think Shaw and Walker are good enough though when they put their mind to it and when put in a defensive system.

Bellingham is gonna go to the very top, I hope to god City don't get him. Last thing we need is another KdB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I had to pick a right side to contain Mbappe then not sure I'd pick many others then Walker/Saka combo on the right and Stones covering but while I'd like to think England wouldn't let that Mbappe's first Poland goal happen, that 2nd goal is unstoppable and doesn't matter who plays.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

Aren't we likely to go to a back 3 against France? Seems like the assumption here is sticking with a back 4?

I'd have thought Gareth might go with:

Walker/Maguire/Stones with Tripper/Shaw as the WBs. 

Henderson / Bellingham / Rice

Saka / Foden

Kane

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Lucas said:

Aren't we likely to go to a back 3 against France? Seems like the assumption here is sticking with a back 4?

I'd have thought Gareth might go with:

Walker/Maguire/Stones with Tripper/Shaw as the WBs. 

Henderson / Bellingham / Rice

Saka / Foden

Kane

11 outfield players? Seems a little bold with Mbappe's form!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Administrators
1 minute ago, Darius1998 said:

11 outfield players? Seems a little bold with Mbappe's form!

Haha, should have counted :D Well, who needs Pickford. 

Actually, drop Henderson I guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ajw10 said:

I don't think Rice is an issue, I think the issue is our two CB's don't progress the ball quickly enough. It's hard for the DM to show for the ball when it takes ages to get to him.

In that first 30 minute, he was non existent and it was mostly on him. Just stayed static in middle which meant the CBs couldn't pass to him, he then wouldn't drop off to receive the ball, meaning the CBs can split more and then he could pass through the lines (this though probably would've failed as Bellingham/Henderson were high/wide most of the time.

When the CBs moved it to one of the full backs, again, Rice wouldn't show staying static in centre which meant the pass was either back to the CB or a square pass to the winger which resulted in possession in being lost. First 15 minutes it was walking football, than Senegal realised they could press a few yards higher as the passes were non existent and got a good amount of joy.

Then from one of the square passes to Foden, his brilliance to back heel flick meant Kane had the ball then we was away, good decision making from Kane then Bellingham, good finish and rest is history as Senegal just folded. 

Basically have to work on why the hell we played like we did first 30, because that was bad and something France will have watched and be ready to pounce on if we are the same. Just need the CMs a bit more closer to Rice, and then Rice a bit more braver to want the ball in tight spaces/dropping off. I think it was more a tactical decision rather than player preference, which will hopefully see it corrected.

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Lucas said:

Haha, should have counted :D Well, who needs Pickford. 

Actually, drop Henderson I guess.

This is the problem with moving to back 3. You have to drop either Henderson or Bellingham and that doesn't sit right after last 2 games. 

Henderson especially has superb since coming into team. He's played well, is a vocal leader and organiser. I'd want him facing France for sure

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Confused Clarity said:

What's he done now?

Might have got lost in the thread but pushing Southgate about Sterling apparently.

 

Of the normal ITV mistakes I did enjoy Pougatch being drowned out by some loud music playing over the top. Shame we had to hear Matterface's cringe prepared lines about socks and something John Stones has said

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Confused Clarity said:

What's he done now?

Asked Southgate about Sterling and whether he’d be back for the rest of the tournament. Southgate gave a comprehensive answer, said he was dealing with a family/personal issue and that they would have to see how it pans out.

Clarke then asked whether Sterling would be going home, to which Southgate said yes. Then Clarke asked him if he’d be back again despite Southgate already answering that! This doesn’t sound as bad as it actually was, but it was proper bottom feeder journo stuff where he was trying to pry juicy details out of Southgate whilst dressing it up as concern for Sterling.

Edited by Smallen
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Smallen said:

Asked Southgate about Sterling and whether he’d be back for the rest of the tournament. Southgate gave a comprehensive answer, said he was dealing with a family/personal issue and that they would have to see how it pans out.

Clarke then asked whether Sterling would be going home, to which Southgate said yes. Then Clarke asked him if he’d be back again despite Southgate already answering that! This doesn’t sound as bad as it actually was, but it was proper bottom feeder journo stuff where he was trying to pry juicy details out of Southgate whilst dressing it up as concern for Sterling.

I hate when sports journalists try to pretend to be real journalists almost as much as political journalists abdicating all responsibility to real journalism.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...