Jump to content

Brazil vs South Korea, Round of 16, 7PM GMT, Stadium 974


PMLF
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 283
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

4 minutes ago, RTHerringbone said:

He's bound to score now but Raphinha is a bit crap really isn't he? Terrible decision making.

Should have called up Gabigol instead of Raphinha…

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, GunmaN1905 said:

Now be serious, you're only mentioning him because he's a Flamengo player.

That helps but he also had a good season and is one of the best Brazilian penalty takers. His main problem is that his temperament can be bad at times.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PMLF said:

one of the best Brazilian penalty takers.

So you're already preparing for that. :brock:

Quote

His main problem is that his temperament can be bad at times.

That's the main reason his career got derailed. He can't function if he's not the main protagonist on the team, which he can't be on any European team or NT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PMLF said:

England and France were given 6 days before their QFs while Brazil and Croatia will have only 4 days.

does that really matter given England play France and Brazil play Croatia?  more concerning if teams playing each other had differing rest periods, which won't happen until the final (well third place match if you want to be picky)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, GunmaN1905 said:

See, this is what I don't get with the rules.

It seems that every Korean is offside when the cross is made, defender obviously can't bank on that and clears the ball, but no offside is given because they didn't touch the ball.

 

Let's say the ball went so fast that it doesn't matter if the ball wasn't visible for the goalie ^^
VAR definitely had mercy there. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GunmaN1905 said:

See, this is what I don't get with the rules.

It seems that every Korean is offside when the cross is made, defender obviously can't bank on that and clears the ball, but no offside is given because they didn't touch the ball.

 

It probably should've been offside. They didn't want to take that away with this scoreline. 

Edited by XuluBak
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Administrators
Just now, CFuller said:

Brazil giving their third goalkeeper a run-out. :thup:

Weverton. Does he have a brother called Wiverpool? :p

Probably a cousin called Wranmere

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, DJ said:

Let's say the ball went so fast that it doesn't matter if the ball wasn't visible for the goalie ^^
VAR definitely had mercy there. 

I wasn't thinking about the shot, but the initial cross.

They all look offside, but the defender doesn't know that. If he did, he would just let them play the ball and get flagged for offside.

Like this, he clears it towards another attacker who scores.

Irrelevant for this match, but so many goals get scored like that and it's just dumb, considering all the nitpicking they do for other situations.

 

Tite making a mockery out of this game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CFuller said:

Brazil giving their third goalkeeper a run-out. :thup:

Weverton. Does he have a brother called Wiverpool? :p

 

1 minute ago, Lucas said:

Probably a cousin called Wranmere

His brother is called Wellyton. :D 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...