Noob21 Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 Nah they're so England When your top striker plays for Pompey you're doomed England to gnash out a 2-nil win (less if Rooney is forced out with fitness issues) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjani'sBootCleaner Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 Anyone have a clue of the type of side Norway will have out? [video=youtube;se_YREv2RHs] Huse-ee-Klepp! EDIT: Basically stop watching after 20 seconds, just 2 goals, before I waste a minute of your lives! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob1981 Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 England to gnash out a 2-nil win (less if Rooney is forced out with fitness issues) :confused: They've already said Rooney won't play. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcsheffreygreat Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 [video=youtube;se_YREv2RHs] Huse-ee-Klepp! EDIT: Basically stop watching after 20 seconds' date=' just 2 goals, before I waste a minute of your lives![/quote'] The guy that couldn't dislodge Adam Rooney from the Blues bench? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ham_aka_stam Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 I'd have been surprised if Hodge started Rooney against Norway anyway and I'd imagine the media would have come down on him if he did so it's win-win. United fans were saying he looked a bit dodgy these last few weeks, maybe it was the toe thing.I think no one has a clue how Hodgson will line up. I think everyone is assuming Gerrard in the 'free role' behind the striker basically cause he's been pretty hopeless everywhere else and a liability. What happens when Rooney comes back to slot into that position though, where does Gerrard go? Back to *gulp* midfield? Good point. Gerrard it is. He might play Rooney up in front of Gerrard. Young on the left and Walcott on the right. Very fluid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob1981 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Martin Kelly is apparently joining up with the squad for the Norway game, then going home again. Bit random. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smallen Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 This some sort of ploy to get scousers back on his side? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob1981 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Wasn't even on the standby list. Ridiculous that we picked a 23 straightaway, rather than a provisional squad of 30. Now we are just pulling in whoever's available because some of the people we could have had will have cleared off on holiday. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjani'sBootCleaner Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 The guy that couldn't dislodge Adam Rooney from the Blues bench? He scores some nice goals. Missed a ****ing hatful against Blackpool away, we could of been 3 or 4 up before they equalised. He was a bit of a let down, but then youtube videos aren't a great barometer, as I learnt with Utaka. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainPlanet Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Kelly has looked proper good on the small runs in the team he's had, would love him to get some more games and really challenge for a first team place this season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeafParrot Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Personally I don't think he's England class yet, but he's good. Solid defensively and runs up and down the flank like a man possessed, but can be a bit rubbish in forward areas. Can't cross and hasn't got much of a passing range. I guess thats what you get from a former youth centre back though. He's a bit like Chris Smalling at right back basically, only he looks less out of place. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob1981 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Personally I don't think he's England class yet, but he's good. Solid defensively and runs up and down the flank like a man possessed, but can be a bit rubbish in forward areas. Can't cross and hasn't got much of a passing range. Sounds like England class to me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainPlanet Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Can't cross is a bit harsh. Reminds me of what Richards was like when he first started looking good, really powerful, bombing forward, great overlaps with the winger, just not sure what to do once he gets to the byline. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeafParrot Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 I'd guess that about half of his crosses hit the first man tbf. Very rarely does he put a decent ball in. Thats not his main job though really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guv'nor Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 Would've been hilarious to start with Crouch and Carroll up top, two orthodox wingers and everyone else just giving the ball some welly! God forbid anybody look at what we have at our disposal and build a formation on those premises. Want to see some big up n' unders from back to front come the weekend and lots of 'av summa thaaaaaaat' from the midfield. Wallop! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
skybluedave Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 What on earth are you talking about Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guv'nor Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 Earth, where the f**k is that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guv'nor Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 @Skybluedave, jokes aside, we have a few players who will be held back by our lack of tactical innovation. Carrick is one of them. Whenever pundits talk of Michael Carrick, the first thing they volunteer in his appraisal, is his inability to tackle. We begin our assessment from the defensive perspective immediately, dare we dream of having possession of the ball. Blood and thunder is the stereotype of the English game and thats what we want, blood stained bandages, walking woundeds. Carrick is a passer, a continental type of midfielder, not in the same class of Pirlo and Alonso, but of the same mould. Should injury leave Tom Huddlestone be, rest assured he'll be the next quarterback riding the pine because no one knows how to integrate his passing ability and passive aggressive approach to tackling, into a formation. Carrick should've gone to the Euros and in truth, theres good reason to believe he should be starting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razzler Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 Wasn't even on the standby list. Ridiculous that we picked a 23 straightaway, rather than a provisional squad of 30. Now we are just pulling in whoever's available because some of the people we could have had will have cleared off on holiday. I guess we wasted so much time in appointing a Manager it's better to pick the 23 and 'get on with it' rather than further fudge about. I assume the Kelly thing is firstly to not give Richards false hope () and also something up with Glen Johnson or Johnson won't play a full 90? Isn't that what Jones is there for then? Seems odd Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lermon Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 presume Sturridge and Adam Johnson are injured? I think Gerrard's a dodgy take but someone pointed out he's probably going to be more fit than the rest of the players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brett.spurs Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 You presume wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razzler Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 I'd take Adam Johnson all day long over the likes of Downing, for starters. Gerrard is very worrying to me for some time now but I think I am the only one concerned, the media haven't said a word so I guess we'll have to wait until he's hopeless against France and we lose or something for someone to say 'hang on, Gerrard doesn't look his best, does he' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcsheffreygreat Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 Yeah still can't believe Sturridge and Johnson were dumped for Downing, baffling really. And Lennon. Stewart Downing ffs Just saying his name makes me die a little inside. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guv'nor Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 Saftey first. Press the button and wait for the green man stuff from Hodgson here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob1981 Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 Live streaming of the England training session on www.thefa.com this morning, think it starts at 10.30 Apparently they had a first team lined up in training yesterday as follows: Carroll Young Gerrard Walcott Parker Lampard Cole Terry Cahill Johnson Hart So most likely that lineup to start against Norway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
skybluedave Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 Just don't see how Carroll is starting. Little purple patch at the end of the season shouldn't change much. Like how we are playing a Liverpool front 2. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob1981 Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 At least Downing isn't in there Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeanNUFC Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 Just don't see how Carroll is starting. Little purple patch at the end of the season shouldn't change much. Like how we are playing a Liverpool front 2. Hit form at right time and has been good for England so far, and lets just say better than the other strikers available, still baffled at the squad selection in terms of the number/quality of strikers taken. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeanNUFC Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 Johnson injured? Well well Roy, should've bought some back up, tw@t. Really don't get a lot of the squad he's selected actually, wonder if he gets payed loads for failure/being sacked? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeafParrot Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 Crouch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carroll. Had to be Johnson that got injured didn't it? The one area of the squad we have no depth at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeanNUFC Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 Crouch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carroll. Had to be Johnson that got injured didn't it? The one area of the squad we have no depth at all. Well we would have if Walker was fit and Richards got selected. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pouncer Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 Why is Richards not selected? Beginning to wonder if there is an FA agenda or something, madness how he's not here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeafParrot Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 I mean in the squad that was chosen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Select_screen_name: Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 Crouch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carroll. Had to be Johnson that got injured didn't it? The one area of the squad we have no depth at all. Haha, Oh effing dear. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeanNUFC Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 Would not pick Crouch over Carroll, but he should've been selected. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudester Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 Why is Richards not selected? Beginning to wonder if there is an FA agenda or something, madness how he's not here. He refused to go on the standby list from what I read so Roy not picking him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeanNUFC Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 He refused to go on the standby list from what I read so Roy not picking him. Shouldn't have refused but can understand, deserves better than that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenco Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 Crouch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carroll. Had to be Johnson that got injured didn't it? The one area of the squad we have no depth at all. I'd be more worried if Joe Hart got injured and Rob Green had to play. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeafParrot Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 Hart is indestructable *touches a big ****off piece of wood* Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob1981 Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 I don't believe Richards would have refused the standby list. Why would he, when there was always the chance Johnson or Jones would get injured. You only have to look at some of the stuff he has put on Twitter about England in the past, he is desperate to be involved. This isn't like a Carrick scenario, Richards is still at the beginning of his career, relatively speaking. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Cartman Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 No way that Richards refused to be on the standby list Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigerhgrrrrrr Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 Sadli I am getting rather excited about watching the Norway game. The last 2 England games are only ones I have not watched if watching them were possible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob1981 Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 Should be good. New manager in charge means Nick Barmby usually pops up with a goal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamez91 Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 Looking forward to seeing some of the players play the way Roy wants them to play. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
skybluedave Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 Why exactly is Rooney missing this game? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeanNUFC Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 To see how we cope without him? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brett.spurs Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 To prepare for the games he's be missing? Also he hurt his toe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayub95 Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 Why exactly is Rooney missing this game? Common sense really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
skybluedave Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 Well we've been 'preparing without him' for the last 3 games. Don't see why he can't train, and at least be on the bench. Unless he is injured. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeanNUFC Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 Well we've been 'preparing without him' for the last 3 games. Don't see why he can't train, and at least be on the bench. Unless he is injured. This is the first time under Roy's management though.... Also brett says he hurt his toe apparently, bloody toe injuries, prefer him not playing in these games anyway unless as a sub. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.