Barrs Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I think they should keep the 3d match how it is, don’t think they should bother improving it to the likes of fifa. improve the football itself, with a fine tune of the match, the ball curling players rolling around when getting hurt, diving, arguing with the ref and the linesman, show player fighting with players to get the ball, and a lot more stuff, but i like how the 3d is set out, in fm 11 it looks a lot clear and fine, what else would you like to see in the 3d match other then improving the graffics? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabio MVP Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I think they should keep the 3d match how it is, don’t think they should bother improving it to the likes of fifa. improve the football itself, with a fine tune of the match, the ball curling players rolling around when getting hurt, diving, arguing with the ref and the linesman, show player fighting with players to get the ball, and a lot more stuff, but i like how the 3d is set out, in fm 11 it looks a lot clear and fine, what else would you like to see in the 3d match other then improving the graffics? I see what you mean, but I would love it to be improved in all segments. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ely-matty Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I think they should keep the 3d match how it is, don’t think they should bother improving it to the likes of fifa. improve the football itself, with a fine tune of the match, the ball curling players rolling around when getting hurt, diving, arguing with the ref and the linesman, show player fighting with players to get the ball, and a lot more stuff, but i like how the 3d is set out, in fm 11 it looks a lot clear and fine, what else would you like to see in the 3d match other then improving the graffics? i think the same: few improvements are good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
crouchaldinho Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I'm probably the only person still playing in 2D Classic. I really don't care about the 3D. I see why people like it, don't get me wrong, but I'm just not interested. I'd rather play in 2D. Something about the imagination factor, being able to see all of the dots from above, always having the player numbers visible. That sort of thing. I can't honestly imagine switching to 3D and I really dislike the idea of the stadiums and that sort of thing. It's all in my head and I don't want it ruined by seeing a 3D representation of it that can never match my imagination. I feel really strongly about that. I'm happy with my dots thanks! All just my opinion, naturally. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AcidBurn Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I'm probably the only person still playing in 2D Classic. I really don't care about the 3D. I see why people like it, don't get me wrong, but I'm just not interested. I'd rather play in 2D. Something about the imagination factor, being able to see all of the dots from above, always having the player numbers visible. That sort of thing. I can't honestly imagine switching to 3D and I really dislike the idea of the stadiums and that sort of thing. It's all in my head and I don't want it ruined by seeing a 3D representation of it that can never match my imagination. I feel really strongly about that. I'm happy with my dots thanks! All just my opinion, naturally. Stupid dots. I had to switch to playing in 2d when my graphics card broke and actually enjoyed it but as soon as I got another one I switched back to 3d. I would like to see all areas improved including graphics. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sando123 Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 3d is pointless unless they make players start doing tricks when ever i do watch it my most skillful players go past people but just knock it past them and run onto it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krald Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I'd be for gradual improvements to the 3d match engine graphically, yet I never expect real stadiums and intricate player faces, both because of the liscencing problems and that there's more important things. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrs Posted September 29, 2010 Author Share Posted September 29, 2010 3d is pointless unless they make players start doing tricks when ever i do watch it my most skillful players go past people but just knock it past them and run onto it yeah i no what your saying, skills would be good but i think players that have over 15 or something to do that, i wouldnt like them to improve on the 3d alot, but a lot of things on the pitch and im sure SI will be more then capable of doing that, mud in the goal area water all over it the ball not going across the grass as it would on a normal day, and the hand ball would be a good 1, its the little things that give it a buzz, like having someone speak on the mic saying the team line up, when players score, subs etc etc, it gives it a good feel i think. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ely-matty Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I'm probably the only person still playing in 2D Classic. I really don't care about the 3D. I see why people like it, don't get me wrong, but I'm just not interested. I'd rather play in 2D. Something about the imagination factor, being able to see all of the dots from above, always having the player numbers visible. That sort of thing. I can't honestly imagine switching to 3D and I really dislike the idea of the stadiums and that sort of thing. It's all in my head and I don't want it ruined by seeing a 3D representation of it that can never match my imagination. I feel really strongly about that. I'm happy with my dots thanks! All just my opinion, naturally. a true football manager watch the game on 2D, especially the first times, for watch the new tactics... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerTime Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I think that animations should come before graphics. I really don't mind not having great graphics and would just rather see more animations put into the game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
samb_95 Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I'm probably the only person still playing in 2D Classic. You are not alone!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fabioke Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I think that animations should come before graphics. I really don't mind not having great graphics and would just rather see more animations put into the game. I second that. Especially dribbling, tackling, diving for the Goalies, Goalscoring, free kicks ....... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hooch is crazy Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Originally Posted by crouchaldinho I'm probably the only person still playing in 2D Classic. You are not alone!!! I also prefer 2D classic. 3D has an awful game engine in my opinion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
munich 1860 Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I wouldn't like a graphic detail such as the fifa games one. I would like to see the manager on the bench, then you can choose a type of personality for yourself..for example, if you say that you are temperamental, you will see the manager moving his arms endlessly, or a calmer one will sit on the bench or just walk sometimes.. Then also more skills from the players, more lobs and more acrobacy.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
23 Carra Gold Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Hmm, well I would like to see the graphics continually improving - providing we still get the options of switching to 2D. The new graphics look fab anyway, but there is always room for improvement. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
crouchaldinho Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Stupid dots. Hey! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerTime Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I also prefer 2D classic. 3D has an awful game engine in my opinion. Care to explain why? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrs Posted September 29, 2010 Author Share Posted September 29, 2010 I wouldn't like a graphic detail such as the fifa games one. I would like to see the manager on the bench, then you can choose a type of personality for yourself..for example, if you say that you are temperamental, you will see the manager moving his arms endlessly, or a calmer one will sit on the bench or just walk sometimes.. Then also more skills from the players, more lobs and more acrobacy.. yeah that sounds alright aswell mate, see the ball boys and players warming up on the sideline Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrs Posted September 29, 2010 Author Share Posted September 29, 2010 Hmm, well I would like to see the graphics continually improving - providing we still get the options of switching to 2D. The new graphics look fab anyway, but there is always room for improvement. i agree it look neat!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gypsum Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I agree that i'd rather see them spending the time polishing what they have, rather than putting the effort into overhauling the graphics. This is a game pretty much based on spreadsheets after all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hooch is crazy Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Care to explain why? Just an opinion mate, its so predictable and the way your defenders "defend" really grinds my gears. i just dont like it to be honest, it kind of makes LMA manager's match engine look good! That being said FM10 is awsome. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCIAG Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 hooch, 2D and 3D are exactly the same. If your defends are defending badly in 3D, then they are in 2D too! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hooch is crazy Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Lol maybe it came across wrong, its not that my defenders play worse when i watch it in 3D its just how bad it looks. The way they just stand still and let people walk past them, atleast in 2D it dosent look half as bad and leaves it all to the imagination. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerTime Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Just an opinion mate, its so predictable and the way your defenders "defend" really grinds my gears. i just dont like it to be honest, it kind of makes LMA manager's match engine look good! That being said FM10 is awsome. I echo what SCIAG said. They'll be defending bad in 3d aswell. Maybe it's just the way your team player which makes you predictable... and rubbish at defending. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hooch is crazy Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I echo what SCIAG said. They'll be defending bad in 3d aswell. Maybe it's just the way your team player which makes you predictable... and rubbish at defending. Wow. Read my last post please. God i didnt know these forums were filled with fan boys! its the same when i watch my friends play the game, i just dont like how it looks, or am i not aloud a negative opinion against FM :S? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgar555 Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I'm probably the only person still playing in 2D Classic. I really don't care about the 3D. I see why people like it, don't get me wrong, but I'm just not interested. I'd rather play in 2D. Something about the imagination factor, being able to see all of the dots from above, always having the player numbers visible. That sort of thing. I can't honestly imagine switching to 3D and I really dislike the idea of the stadiums and that sort of thing. It's all in my head and I don't want it ruined by seeing a 3D representation of it that can never match my imagination. I feel really strongly about that. I'm happy with my dots thanks! All just my opinion, naturally. You're not the only one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerTime Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Wow. Read my last post please. God i didnt know these forums were filled with fan boys! its the same when i watch my friends play the game, i just dont like how it looks, or am i not aloud a negative opinion against FM :S? Sorry, I was writing my post whilst you were posting yours, therefore I didn't see it until after I posted mine. I understand what you mean. I agree the element of imagination in 2d is good and I like that but overall I prefer 3d. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hooch is crazy Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Sorry, I was writing my post whilst you were posting yours, therefore I didn't see it until after I posted mine.I understand what you mean. I agree the element of imagination in 2d is good and I like that but overall I prefer 3d. Its fine Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrs Posted September 29, 2010 Author Share Posted September 29, 2010 i like 2d and 3d for all differnet reasons, wonder if anyone still uses the commentary haha Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerTime Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I'm surprised just commentary is still in the game. Is there anyone who actually uses it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
crouchaldinho Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Dafuge will be in here in just a minute. (The answer is yes!) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerTime Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Why do you use it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
crouchaldinho Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I don't personally. I'm a 2D Classic man, extended highlights. Dafuge uses it. He's the only one I know who uses it actually. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrs Posted September 29, 2010 Author Share Posted September 29, 2010 the crowed singing would be good Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerTime Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I don't personally. I'm a 2D Classic man, extended highlights. Dafuge uses it. He's the only one I know who uses it actually. You mean he uses it all the time! Wow, must be hard to make tactical decision and get very boring. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ishu Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I don't personally. I'm a 2D Classic man, extended highlights. Dafuge uses it. He's the only one I know who uses it actually. I do too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aim_Less Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 a true football manager watch the game on 2D, especially the first times, for watch the new tactics... Thats just elitist and dumb there is no "true football manager" . there is a radar widget for that so no need to use 2D for that as-well Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The-Perfect-Fm'er! Posted September 30, 2010 Share Posted September 30, 2010 One day FIFA graphics with FM's match engine would be nice!!! Pretty unrealistic for any of the next 10 years though let's be honest. I'm happy with the way it works, I think the way the game is and the tactical side of things are pretty realistic. It's still fun to watch and serves a purpose when you watch out for it tactically, in the way you want the team to play. I think it's spot on, can improve no doubt, more animations, better defending at times, different type goals, but on the whole, it's pretty good and pretty realistic in terms of movement/tactics. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carmi88 Posted September 30, 2010 Share Posted September 30, 2010 staying away from anything fifa like is all i want x) except the sport ofcourse! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leumd Posted September 30, 2010 Share Posted September 30, 2010 I used to be a 2D hardcore enthusiast, but every time I went to play the game from Steam I'd see a nice looking screentshot of the 3D view behind the play button. One day I took the plunge, turned all settings down apart from player detail and I've never looked back =) But have to agree, defending looks pretty poor in 3D. Players running sideways really winds me up - "Watch while I side step 90 yards down the pitch to chase after their speedy striker with 19 Pace" says my lumbering fullback with pace of 5 =) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aytumious Posted September 30, 2010 Share Posted September 30, 2010 Since the graphics department isn't the same department working on the match engine, I don't see much of a reason for them not to make the graphics as good as possible. Of course, I play in 2D, but I'm all for a better match game experience, and I think graphics would help in that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellis_D Posted September 30, 2010 Share Posted September 30, 2010 I always watch the first half with just the commentary on! I'm old school. Just replays of the goals, no highlights. And the replays are always in 2D, none of this 3D malarkey for me. In the second half, if I am leading by 2 goals or more, I just leave it on commentary (always at full speed). However, if the game is dodgy, i.e I am losing, drawing or leading by just one goal, I switch to extended highlights and slow the game down a few notches. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrs Posted September 30, 2010 Author Share Posted September 30, 2010 i think when fm, well it was cm when they first brang 2d out, i think 2d had a bigger build up then 3d when they came out, im a 3d man but don't mind 2d, but commentary couldn't do that lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sanjin84 Posted September 30, 2010 Share Posted September 30, 2010 Just as somebody above said, FIFA graphics with FM match engine would be the biggest leap in football management games. I see that being very possible in the next 5 years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
slipknot67 Posted September 30, 2010 Share Posted September 30, 2010 I'm surprised just commentary is still in the game. Is there anyone who actually uses it? Yep...I still use text only. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rista Posted September 30, 2010 Share Posted September 30, 2010 FM doesn't need FIFA graphics imo. What it does need however and better animations and more of them. Judging by FM 11 screenshots and videos, the graphics have improved but the animations are still awfully robotic and unnatural. We need smoother transitions between animations, that's what FIFA is really good at. Even PES isn't all that great but it's still obviously much more fluid than FM. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mintchip Posted September 30, 2010 Share Posted September 30, 2010 Are you lot serious???? The graphics of FIFA11 are immense. How would you not want that? I dream of the day when I sign a world class player and be able to see him play in full on FIFA graphics and see that his style of play is different form other players etc and can notice him in a second, rather than waiting for his number etc. Sometimes change is for the good. Not sure Liverpool fans would agree though... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ishu Posted September 30, 2010 Share Posted September 30, 2010 Are you lot serious???? The graphics of FIFA11 are immense. How would you not want that? I dream of the day when I sign a world class player and be able to see him play in full on FIFA graphics and see that his style of play is different form other players etc and can notice him in a second, rather than waiting for his number etc.Sometimes change is for the good. Not sure Liverpool fans would agree though... Lol players don't even dribble in FM (yet), so fat chance we can see distinct styles. I want a heck lot more animations before graphics. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danielos Posted September 30, 2010 Share Posted September 30, 2010 If they going to do an advanced 3D engine, then I think we need a tool similar to The Sims to make our own manager avatar. I want to be a slightly overweight, bearded manager in a badly fitting training suit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Le God Posted September 30, 2010 Share Posted September 30, 2010 I also prefer 2D classic. 3D has an awful game engine in my opinion. The match engine for the 2D and 3D is the same. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.