HMSPompey Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Or the traditional? What's generally preferred in the Community? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NVS_Gooner4life Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 I always use 3d match view, with the zoomed side scrolling or what it called. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dangerpuss Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Only commentary. I occasionally watch replays of goals to see what ridiculous farce has been created. The 3D match engine is very far from being acceptable and the graphics are laughably bad like something from 15 years ago. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cougar2010 Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Only commentary. I occasionally watch replays of goals to see what ridiculous farce has been created. The 3D match engine is very far from being acceptable and the graphics are laughably bad like something from 15 years ago. I disagree, the 3d enhances the game and gives a good representation of what is happening. The graphics may not be Fifa standard but are more than acceptable. Personally 3d, extended highlights from an elevated view. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HMSPompey Posted January 30, 2010 Author Share Posted January 30, 2010 Thanks ever so much for poll. Personally I switch between 3D and 2D regularly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon07 Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 3D is awful in my honset opinion, I watch it and find myself laughing alot. 2D classic always for me. I like to be able to imagine what happened... if that makes sense!? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dav_58 Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 3D with key highlights at a pretty fast speed. replays of goals on slower speed. Think the 3D is really good as it goes. I always used commentary only before this years game, didnt think the graphics were good enough on 09 to watch 3d but now there alot better Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManUTactician247 Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 I watch 3D, you can actually see if the guy's heading it or kicking it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
B. Stinson Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Nothing but full-match 3D for me. I find it makes matches far more enjoyable to watch. That is, since I don't hold the far too common expectation that an infant 3D match engine is supposed to be indistinguishable from reality. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robertcornell68 Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 i watch 3d, you can actually see if the guy's heading it or kicking it qft. 567890 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dragce Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 I have upgraded my PC and now I can finally play in 3D mode Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabio MVP Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Touchline view for me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sad Git Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 2D. It's better to use your imagination. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
crouchaldinho Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 2D Classic. CAMRAD etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sean Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 Nothing but full-match 3D for me.I find it makes matches far more enjoyable to watch. That is, since I don't hold the far too common expectation that an infant 3D match engine is supposed to be indistinguishable from reality. Completely agree. I think the 3D engine is great, considering it is in its second year. If it hasn't improved fifteen years from now, then that would be a problem... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayresyboy1996 Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 3D all day long. I mean what's the point in watching 2D if you have advanced technolodgy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom14 Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 2D all day long. 3D just doesn't look good enough in my opinion. Player motion is terrible. At least with 2D I can use my imagination abit, but with 3D it's just awful. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TopToffee Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 2D all day long. 3D just doesn't look good enough in my opinion. Player motion is terrible. At least with 2D I can use my imagination abit, but with 3D it's just awful. it's not awful at all. It isn't supposed to look like FIFA or PES...Personally I think the 3D just gives your imagination more to work with, and makes what you imagine more accurate to what's ACTUALLY happening. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom14 Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 I never said it was supposed to look like FIFA or PES so that comment is a bit irrelevant. Watch a football match, and then watch the 3D match engine. The difference is huge. I know that were never going to get anything as realistic as a football match, but 3D just doesn't look like football at all, hence why I called it awful. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sean Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 If people want to watch it in 2D, then I guess that is their choice. To me, it is a bit like watching TV on a tube rather than an HD-flatscreen. I prefer the newer technology in most cases, even if it is in its infancy like the FM 3D engine. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom14 Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 If people want to watch it in 2D, then I guess that is their choice. To me, it is a bit like watching TV on a tube rather than an HD-flatscreen. I prefer the newer technology in most cases, even if it is in its infancy like the FM 3D engine. It's newer technology and it is impressive with the resources available, however, that doesn't mean that it looks anything like football. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suzie MUFC Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 2D Classic. CAMRAD etc. +1 2D is so much better tactically, and for mental immersion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sean Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 It's newer technology and it is impressive with the resources available, however, that doesn't mean that it looks anything like football. Like I said, if you want to watch it in 2D, the God Bless. To argue that you are against 3D because it doesn't look "realistic" implies that you believe 2D to be "more realistic," which I do not think would receive universal support. Your preference of 2D is your business, as is my preference of 3D. What seems as odd and hard to understand from your perspective of why I would prefer 3D is a view I share of why you prefer 2D. No offense taken, hopefully none given. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suzie MUFC Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 Like I said, if you want to watch it in 2D, the God Bless. To argue that you are against 3D because it doesn't look "realistic" implies that you believe 2D to be "more realistic," which I do not think would receive universal support. Your preference of 2D is your business, as is my preference of 3D. What seems as odd and hard to understand from your perspective of why I would prefer 3D is a view I share of why you prefer 2D. No offense taken, hopefully none given. I don't think it's a case of "2D is more realistic than 3D", it's really that 3D is trying to be something that it'll never match - reality. With 2D, you're able to use your imagination more, and this fills in any gaps regarding realism. But with 3D, it's trying to fill those gaps itself, and not quite making it, which spoils the immersion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sean Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 I don't think it's a case of "2D is more realistic than 3D", it's really that 3D is trying to be something that it'll never match - reality. With 2D, you're able to use your imagination more, and this fills in any gaps regarding realism. But with 3D, it's trying to fill those gaps itself, and not quite making it, which spoils the immersion. From your perspective, and others like you, this is probably always going to be the case. For me, and those like me, the 3D is intriguing and has the possibility of taking the game to another level. There is always something to be said for the nostalgia of "old school" video games; such is the continued draw for the original NES. SI are trying to stay at the leading edge of the market with 3D and other innovations. These will be well-received by some and poorly-received by others. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suzie MUFC Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 From your perspective, and others like you, this is probably always going to be the case. For me, and those like me, the 3D is intriguing and has the possibility of taking the game to another level. There is always something to be said for the nostalgia of "old school" video games; such is the continued draw for the original NES. SI are trying to stay at the leading edge of the market with 3D and other innovations. These will be well-received by some and poorly-received by others. It's not about nostalgia, it's the fact that I can interpret things better with 2D than with 3D. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sean Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 It's not about nostalgia, it's the fact that I can interpret things better with 2D than with 3D. Fair enough. God Bless. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marksablade Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 2D all day long. Non TV View altho I may look at swapping between them two. Simple as that, can't stand 3D, don't know why, just can't. Although when I were Solihull Moors my team were playing rubbish and I mean rubbish, I think I went 5 games without scoring, creating a chance for that matter on 3D. Switched to 2D and I creeped out of the relegation zone, no kidding. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
phnompenhandy Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 Always 3D and always touchline view - for one simple reason: realism. By the same token I always use the touchline shouts and never the sliders. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IMT Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 +12D is so much better tactically, and for mental immersion. Totally and utterly disagree with that, you simply can't tell what your dots are doing properly, and any subtle changes to tactics you make don't seem to make much difference on 2D, whereas on 3D you can actually see you tactics and changes taking effect to a much higher degree. 3D all the way for me! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alimac Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 Only commentary. I occasionally watch replays of goals to see what ridiculous farce has been created. The 3D match engine is very far from being acceptable and the graphics are laughably bad like something from 15 years ago. Why do you play the game? Just to moan about it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suzie MUFC Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 Totally and utterly disagree with that, you simply can't tell what your dots are doing properly, and any subtle changes to tactics you make don't seem to make much difference on 2D, whereas on 3D you can actually see you tactics and changes taking effect to a much higher degree.3D all the way for me! You say I can't, but I can. I can tell more difference in tactics from a top-down viewpoint than any other viewpoint, it's the reason why some football managers take a seat a few rows up, so they can get a better overall view of the tactical situation. The same reason why most strategy games are based on a top-down/isometric view. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
crowsus Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 3D is a good addition, didnt get FM09 so i dont really know how much improvement was made but I have been quite impressed. A lot of the more subtle details like 50-50 challenges, shirt pulls, acrobatic volleys, injuries and dribbling skills need to be improved for the next edition but im sure SI are working on it. Good to know 2D classic dots are still there for those who want/need it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee Aja Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 My new laptop runs the 3D view surprisingly well, but I just prefer the 2D classic match view. I can see things much more clearly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
neevesc Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 3D for me. It's been a good first step to the 3D match engine, give it a couple more years of development and it will be great. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
grep Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 I have always been a strong 2D fan but this time I have to admit the job inside FM10 is definetly worth, compared to the 3D garbage of FM09. It could be further improved yes, above all fixing 3D slowness random bugs but it is definitely worth. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
erik86 Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 3D on Zoomed Vertical Scrolling Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSGTroyer Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 3D touchline, only. Wish the angle was even lower, for reality's sake... I've even changed one of the crowd chants to "CAMRAAAAAAAD's a faaaaaaad" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgar555 Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 Totally and utterly disagree with that, you simply can't tell what your dots are doing properly, and any subtle changes to tactics you make don't seem to make much difference on 2D, whereas on 3D you can actually see you tactics and changes taking effect to a much higher degree.3D all the way for me! Nonsense. 2D classic helps you see the whole tactical picture and you can quite clearly see what you've changed. 3D is not good enough but even if it was I'd still be on 2D just because it helps me understand the game better and immerse myself better in the game, with my imagination filling in the blanks rather than an average 3D animation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChewyFun Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 2D Classic. Despite working fine on my PC, 3D doesn't quite seem right, in fact it removes any immersion I feel to the match. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IMT Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 You say I can't, but I can. Sorry, didn't mean you can't as in you personally. It's like anything isn't it? All down to opinion, like I say for me personally 3D shows a better tactical representation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuncEris Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 2D - classic 3d needs A LOT of work being done in it which i dont think it will become an acceptable state.. but this doesnt mean im unhappy about 2D part. It gives so much freedom to think how awesome is my goals and how stupid the opponent ones Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JorgenD Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 With FM10 I only watch matches in 3D. In FM09 I sticked to 2D. 3D in FM10 works well imho. There are of course a few issues here and there, like strange animations, sliding players, etc, but all in all the 3D view works best for me. It's almost like watching a real game....! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
anthony wright Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 Still playing FM09 and watch in 3D If and when I start to play FM2010 i am not sure because if defenders dont tackle or close down then I think I would become frustrated. In 09 my defenders get stuck in and my defence is pretty solid I just wish my front players woiuld score more goals. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontask Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 watch on 3d but it does seem 2 go slow on my computer after 2 or 3 hours of gameplay Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl_272 Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 3D. I had to use 2D when I first got the game, but I have a good computer now and I couldn't go back. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El_Ricardo Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 3D - I'm a recent convert, since I've now built a PC gaming monster. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.