Danny_648 Posted October 30, 2008 Share Posted October 30, 2008 Right with pre-season now over here are my results, Walking in on my 1st day as Chelsmford manager i soon realise i have 5 players to choose from and no staff, so i quickly get to work signing, 1 coach, 1 physio, 1 assistant manager and 2 scouts, thats is shortly followed by 20 signings. So i now have a squad to work with and some backroom staff, im told that my odds on winning the league are a shallow 33/1, so i know i have a job on my hands, so i get my assistant to start arranging friendlys whilst i start thinking about tactics. It soons comes down to me choosing my captains and i choose to ignore my assistants advice and choose who i think suits the bill, well how wrong could i be, i have a whole squad of unhappy players before i have even played my first friendly. So after all my friendlys i quickly realise that my team need some time to gel as there are too many stay passes and attacks leading to nothing, also my defence is a big problem its actually funny to watch sometimes, anyway here's how i got on, Played - 5 Won - 0 Lost - 4 Drew - 1 Scoring - 2 Conceeding - 15 So things aint looking too good as of yet but i have faith in my squad of young stars to be, il be keeping you updated on my fight for survival... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjaminoo Posted October 30, 2008 Share Posted October 30, 2008 Sorry I haven't been posting updates, just come back from America for a week. Should have my second season update by the end of the weekend Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny_648 Posted October 30, 2008 Share Posted October 30, 2008 Right i'm 10 games into my first season, and after a poor pre-season im very happy with how my first 10 games have gone, despite my last results being a 6.1 trashing at the hands of Thurrock, hopefully my team can pick themselves up from this and continue their good form, well here's a screeny of the league table after 10 games: http://img352.imageshack.us/my.php?image=tablest1.jpg As you can see im not doing too badly and will post another report when i reach 20 league games... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest roberto922 Posted October 30, 2008 Share Posted October 30, 2008 Ah it's had a new lease of life Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny_648 Posted October 30, 2008 Share Posted October 30, 2008 This is the first time i have played with a club outside of the premiership, and i must say it is so frustrating, you get onto the fact your managing a small team when your watching your players playing the wrong passes and fluffing so many chances, its stressfull but fun lol.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
basic_flaw Posted October 30, 2008 Share Posted October 30, 2008 The fact they NEVER stop the ball after it's thrown back from the stands... I'm pretty sure being in BSS doesn't render you incapable of catching a ball! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamFitz Posted October 31, 2008 Share Posted October 31, 2008 Hey lads, quick update I'm 1st after 20 games with 41 points, I've lost two key players that I got on loan, but we're still doing well. Play-Offs seems realistic now although my target was to stay in the league. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChelseaDaft Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 Chelseadaft Ilkeston Season 7 Blue Square Premier 2014/2015. After avoiding relegation and obtaining some stability in the league i was looking forward to an improvement in the forthcoming season. Out went the deadwood and in came the new whilst again utilising the loan options with my parent club. It was pre season when one of my main strikers declared he wanted to move to a bigger club, so with that he was sold to Burton for 40k. To my surprise a player who i had loaned for many of my seasons so far from Derby was available on a free transfer so in he came as a direct replacement. Again i strengthened the side with a bit more quality from scouted players and looked forward to a challenging season. It was an amazing season, not only did we improve on our best finish of 15th in the BSP but we finished 8th and also won the Setanta Shield! It was an amazing season. Here are the screenies: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v228/chelseadaft/Season%207/table7.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v228/chelseadaft/Season%207/squad7.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v228/chelseadaft/Season%207/transfers7.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v228/chelseadaft/Season%207/squad7.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v228/chelseadaft/Season%207/finances7.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v228/chelseadaft/Season%207/final.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v228/chelseadaft/Season%207/ssfinalwin.jpg My Career so far in the Default Training and Tactic Dafuges Challenge - Ilkeston. Season 1 08/09 BSN Position 3rd. Season 2 09/10 BSN Position 1st Promoted Season 3 10/11 BSP Position 20th. Season 4 11/12 BSP Position 22nd Relegated Season 5 12/13 BSN Position 1st Promoted Season 6 13/14 BSP Position 15th. Season 7 14/15 BSP Position 8th. Setanta Shield Winners. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
daemonic Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 Ah it's had a new lease of life And then the FM09 demo was released and the new lease of life was extinguished.... Anyone know who the likely candidates for this challenge on 09 will be? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest roberto922 Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 FC United could be? They'd be fun, maybe Canvey? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
canvey!! Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 I'm afraid Canvey Island aren't going to be all that likely: having just got into the Ryman Premier and not being that well known their reputation won't be that high. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
minisav Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 Well there's still that small chance though! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
canvey!! Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 Yes. I'd say it's about as likely as AFC Hornchurch was this year, and 6 out of 637 were managing AFC Hornchurch, so... And of course, I'll make it my goal to get Canvey Island up and complete the challenge with them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
canvey!! Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 If it works as it did last year (which I'm certain it will), six teams from the leagues directly below will be chosen based on reputation and promoted, i.e. teams below the Ryman/Unibond/Southern Premier cannot be promoted into the Blue Square North/South. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty Walds Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 Boston United, hopefully Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SI Staff Pete Dewhirst Posted November 4, 2008 SI Staff Share Posted November 4, 2008 FC United could be? They'd be fun, maybe Canvey? Aren't FC United effectively going to be the next AFC Wimbledon though? As in the biggest of the smallest teams? Not that that is a bad thing, I just imagine it'd be less of a challenge because they'd be richer, though tbh I know little about them. Not sure whether to go with Whitby again or possibly Kendal... getting a small Lake District town to the Champions League final sounds like a laugh! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dafuge Posted November 4, 2008 Author Share Posted November 4, 2008 Aren't FC United effectively going to be the next AFC Wimbledon though? As in the biggest of the smallest teams? Not that that is a bad thing, I just imagine it'd be less of a challenge because they'd be richer, though tbh I know little about them.Not sure whether to go with Whitby again or possibly Kendal... getting a small Lake District town to the Champions League final sounds like a laugh! I imagine FC United will be a popular choice if they are available, I'm thinking of managing them myself. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebs Posted November 4, 2008 Share Posted November 4, 2008 I haven't really kept people updated but just to let you know I've just finished my first season in the prem with Tonbridge Angels. It's now 2021-22 - taken me ages, I've been on this challenge for months now. Spent the longest in BSP and the Championship. But it's been a success so far. First season in Prem I've finished 6th and qualified for Uefa Cup. Just sold a 4m cb for 20m to Arsenal. Title here we come!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaeltmurrayuk Posted November 4, 2008 Share Posted November 4, 2008 Aren't FC United effectively going to be the next AFC Wimbledon though? As in the biggest of the smallest teams? Not that that is a bad thing, I just imagine it'd be less of a challenge because they'd be richer, though tbh I know little about them.Not sure whether to go with Whitby again or possibly Kendal... getting a small Lake District town to the Champions League final sounds like a laugh! I expect FC United will be the Gateshead of FM09. It leaves me with a tough choice of either Marine or FC United assuming either get promoted. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thebaker Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 Aren't FC United effectively going to be the next AFC Wimbledon though? As in the biggest of the smallest teams? Not that that is a bad thing, I just imagine it'd be less of a challenge because they'd be richer, though tbh I know little about them. Just could'nt get into it this year, choose halesowen and could'nt identify with them. Looking foward to the fm09 challenge, i was hoping didcot would be in it but they fell at the last, still maybe fm10 (or AFC Totton). Farnborough will be the biggest team by miles this year, in terms of rep, size and facilities, bigger i think than fc unitied. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mag man Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 I'm pretty excited about this challenge... hopefully it will be a bit easier to get Maidstone promoted this year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChelseaDaft Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 Hi all another couple of season updates for you: Chelseadaft Ilkeston Season 9 2015/1016 BSP. Well what a nightmare this season has been. Derby cancelled their link to me as a parent club so had to search for another one. In the meantime another couple of players became unhappy and wanted to move on. Paul Bishop my steardy full back wanted to move so was sold for 100k (nice) and my DC who always played alongside a loanee wanted off too so he went for 18k. So i was struggling to sign players good enough to keep me up. I searched for another parent club and was only offered Sheff Utd or Mansfield who had only just recently been promoted out of the BSP. Problem was Sheff Utd only had reserves who had been promoted from their youth side. Basically i didnt have a strong enough squad to survive but somehow managed it. Not a good season after the 8th place and a cup win to boot the season before! Screenies below: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v228/chelseadaft/Season%208/squad8.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v228/chelseadaft/Season%208/transfers8.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v228/chelseadaft/Season%208/table8.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v228/chelseadaft/Season%208/finances8.jpg Chelseadaft Ilkeston 2016/2017 BSP. Another bad season and more players becoming unhappy! Was a bit of a mess to be honest. I decided to renegotiate a parent club so cancelled the link with Sheff Utd on 7th July when it was the earliest opportunity to. Looked around again for a parent club and again was offered Mansfield or Notts County which wasn't good enough. So had to shop around the players that were available on loan that my assistant had identified on my seach screen and brought some in at the start of the season. Also brought in a couple of Sheff Utd players who had done ok for me the season before. Struggled big time as more of my players wanted away at the start of the season but couldnt afford to sell them until replacements came in. So had to deal with pretty much the same standard squad i finished the season with and had the odd "unhappy" player. Wasn't too long before we found ourselves 22nd in the league and 10 games without a win. Managed to wait before i could ask the board to look for another parent club and again was offered Sheff Utd, to got em on board again and brought in a fair few loanees again. Sold the players who wanted out and brought in one or two my scouts had found and managed to put a tidy run of games together to survive another season in the BSP. At the close of the season i have just been offered another 2 year deal but with the aim to avoid relegation so thats a start. Its about time i got out of this league! Screenies below: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v228/chelseadaft/Season%209/table9.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v228/chelseadaft/Season%209/squad9.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v228/chelseadaft/Season%209/transfers9.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v228/chelseadaft/Season%209/finances9.jpg My Career so far in my Dafuge Challenge (using basic general training & the default tactic) Season 1 08/09 BSN Position 3rd. Season 2 09/10 BSN Position 1st Promoted Season 3 10/11 BSP Position 20th. Season 4 11/12 BSP Position 22nd Relegated Season 5 12/13 BSN Position 1st Promoted Season 6 13/14 BSP Position 15th. Season 7 14/15 BSP Position 8th. Setanta Shield Winners. Season 8 15/16 BSP Position 18th. Season 9 16/17 BSP Position 17th. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackmama Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 Just wondering - when Dafuge's challenge for FM09 sets off, how will the new features be implemented in the "Dafuge FM rules of engagement". I'm particularly interested in the new "Ask assistant for new loan signings" feature. Will it be mandatory to scout the suggested players? I don't know whether the assistant will ever propose players who you can't scout - but just in case. Thanks in advance - can't wait to get started. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest roberto922 Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 I forgot to mention, I've gone as AFC Wimbledon on the demo and I'm gonna get a parent club, I'll see if the loans are still unrealistic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest roberto922 Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 I was only offered QPR and Charlton as parent clubs so that aspects improved. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest roberto922 Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 You can only have two long term players, is that how it's always been in BSS? I've just got Josh Wright on loan who should rip the league apart so not much has changed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
canvey!! Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 You can only have two long term players, is that how it's always been in BSS? In FM terms, that came in in patch 8.0.1. You do know you can edit your posts, and not triple-post? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dafuge Posted November 7, 2008 Author Share Posted November 7, 2008 Just wondering - when Dafuge's challenge for FM09 sets off, how will the new features be implemented in the "Dafuge FM rules of engagement". I'm particularly interested in the new "Ask assistant for new loan signings" feature. Will it be mandatory to scout the suggested players? I don't know whether the assistant will ever propose players who you can't scout - but just in case.Thanks in advance - can't wait to get started. Interesting thought, I'm assuming that the players that the assistant will recommend will be scoutable, but I think that these players should be ok to loan provided the assistant has recommended them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest roberto922 Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 Canvey - yes I do know but I was just using quick reply whilst playing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nerner Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 Has anyone done this challenge yet? Or has no-one even come close? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest roberto922 Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 Yeah quite a few have. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
canvey!! Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 Has anyone done this challenge yet? Or has no-one even come close? gillianchung, Scab, Leth4187, Beng, 3Sixty, dafuge, Rickaldo, kaNovi, ejthegreat, Annihilator666 and michaeltmurrayuk have completed the challenge. That's 11 people. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest roberto922 Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 And I came very close but I'm bored of FM 08 now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackmama Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 Interesting thought, I'm assuming that the players that the assistant will recommend will be scoutable, but I think that these players should be ok to loan provided the assistant has recommended them. The highlighted phrase were my initial thought as well, but it might not be as simple. Even in lower leagues you get the odd player (e.g. Anthony Robinson at Mansfield ) who originates from Barbados. If he were to be your player/assistant he could possibly recommend some player from Barbados, that your board under normal circumstances would not allow you to scout. I hereby declare that signing players on loan as adviced by my assistant due to a new feature being implemented in FM09, will only occur after receiving minimum 1 additional scout report by either the assistant or a scout affiliated with the club managed by me Whether or not this approach will be mandatory is not my decision - It's yours......I just feel it's right Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scab Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 I think it's reasonable to be allowed to sign players that your assistant knows about. These types of in-game features offer a realistic way to find talent, as opposed to stuff like the search engine and global transfers list. IMHO it should be encouraged, not limited. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dafuge Posted November 7, 2008 Author Share Posted November 7, 2008 The highlighted phrase were my initial thought as well, but it might not be as simple. Even in lower leagues you get the odd player (e.g. Anthony Robinson at Mansfield ) who originates from Barbados. If he were to be your player/assistant he could possibly recommend some player from Barbados, that your board under normal circumstances would not allow you to scout. I hereby declare that signing players on loan as adviced by my assistant due to a new feature being implemented in FM09, will only occur after receiving minimum 1 additional scout report by either the assistant or a scout affiliated with the club managed by me Whether or not this approach will be mandatory is not my decision - It's yours......I just feel it's right I would be tempted to say that would be ok, seeing as in the past having a Bulgarian coach may give you access to tempting Bulgarian players in on trial to sign them. This one's still up for discussion though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dafuge Posted November 8, 2008 Author Share Posted November 8, 2008 I've had a request for a rule change which will make a big impact on the first season, but it should be for the good. For FM09, all people should load all players from England. This should mean that the newly promoted clubs in the second season are full of real players rather than getting empty squads with a handful of youth regens. This request came from a head researcher for the lower leagues whose work often goes unnoticed because of the large database overlooking these players. Thoughts? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thebaker Posted November 8, 2008 Share Posted November 8, 2008 I've had a request for a rule change which will make a big impact on the first season, but it should be for the good.For FM09, all people should load all players from England. This should mean that the newly promoted clubs in the second season are full of real players rather than getting empty squads with a handful of youth regens. This request came from a head researcher for the lower leagues whose work often goes unnoticed because of the large database overlooking these players. Thoughts? I think that would be a good idea as you would then have to get the best out of what is already there and work to get some in within any budgets. sometimes when signing a full team its too easy to sign a lot of good players to ensure promotion the first season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dafuge Posted November 8, 2008 Author Share Posted November 8, 2008 I think that would be a good idea as you would then have to get the best out of what is already there and work to get some in within any budgets.sometimes when signing a full team its too easy to sign a lot of good players to ensure promotion the first season. Definitely. I've always found it more of a challenge taking over a team where a clearout is needed before rebuilding the squad. Starting with an empty squad is actually surprisingly easy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thebaker Posted November 8, 2008 Share Posted November 8, 2008 Definitely. I've always found it more of a challenge taking over a team where a clearout is needed before rebuilding the squad. Starting with an empty squad is actually surprisingly easy. Eastleigh is always a classic example of this, no transfer money or spare wage budget, high board asperations and a lot of dead wood in the squad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaeltmurrayuk Posted November 8, 2008 Share Posted November 8, 2008 I've had a request for a rule change which will make a big impact on the first season, but it should be for the good.For FM09, all people should load all players from England. This should mean that the newly promoted clubs in the second season are full of real players rather than getting empty squads with a handful of youth regens. This request came from a head researcher for the lower leagues whose work often goes unnoticed because of the large database overlooking these players. Thoughts? It should still be possible to use a retain players file to just retain all the players for the challenge teams, rather than retaining all english players - retaining all english players may be too much for some peoples computers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scab Posted November 8, 2008 Share Posted November 8, 2008 I'm all for loading all players from England. Admittedly I'd rather start with an empty squad, but as has already been said; that's because it's easier to start from scratch than to deal with a bunch of contracted players you don't want. For the sake of realism and increasing the difficulty a tad (ha! like we needed that..) I think it's a good idea. To be honest I also sympathise with that head researcher whose work doesn't even come to show in a challenge like this... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dafuge Posted November 8, 2008 Author Share Posted November 8, 2008 It should still be possible to use a retain players file to just retain all the players for the challenge teams, rather than retaining all english players - retaining all english players may be too much for some peoples computers. Do you know what sort of difference between the two we are looking at? Would all English players be significantly different to just loading the three feeder leagues? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaeltmurrayuk Posted November 8, 2008 Share Posted November 8, 2008 Do you know what sort of difference between the two we are looking at?Would all English players be significantly different to just loading the three feeder leagues? I don't know what the exact difference would be - the main difference would depend on the database size selected, I'm not sure but I don't think a small database would select all the youth players in the database for the english league sides. I can run a couple of quick tests with fm08 to see what the difference is, though that would assume that fm09 database works in the same way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dafuge Posted November 8, 2008 Author Share Posted November 8, 2008 I don't know what the exact difference would be - the main difference would depend on the database size selected, I'm not sure but I don't think a small database would select all the youth players in the database for the english league sides.I can run a couple of quick tests with fm08 to see what the difference is, though that would assume that fm09 database works in the same way. That would be great. I'm thinking of using a large database with all English players loaded. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest roberto922 Posted November 8, 2008 Share Posted November 8, 2008 Same here, I'm gonna try and do it without a Premiership/Championship parent club too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dafuge Posted November 8, 2008 Author Share Posted November 8, 2008 Same here, I'm gonna try and do it without a Premiership/Championship parent club too. I'm tempted to go without a parent club as well, in the past I've always had one but not really used any loan players. I think the money/friendly will be the things I miss the most. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest roberto922 Posted November 8, 2008 Share Posted November 8, 2008 I'll have one but it will e one from L1 or lower. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackmama Posted November 8, 2008 Share Posted November 8, 2008 I've had a request for a rule change which will make a big impact on the first season, but it should be for the good.For FM09, all people should load all players from England. This should mean that the newly promoted clubs in the second season are full of real players rather than getting empty squads with a handful of youth regens. This request came from a head researcher for the lower leagues whose work often goes unnoticed because of the large database overlooking these players. Thoughts? I vote Yes. It feels more realistic and that's always a good thing in my book! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaeltmurrayuk Posted November 8, 2008 Share Posted November 8, 2008 Do you know what sort of difference between the two we are looking at?Would all English players be significantly different to just loading the three feeder leagues? That would be great.I'm thinking of using a large database with all English players loaded. Using the FM08 8.0.2 database, running all english leagues you get the following amount of players: PLAYERS DEFAULT RETAIN ENG DDT SMALL 9471 15496 10587 MED 10521 16724 11650 LARGE 12685 18838 13792 NON-PLAYERS DEFAULT RETAIN ENG DDT SMALL 4876 6886 5104 MED 4875 6905 5106 LARGE 4908 6939 5140 CLUBS DEFAULT RETAIN ENG DDT SMALL 2035 2228 2037 MED 2240 2386 2217 LARGE 2881 3055 2848 Retaining players from england adds an extra ~6,000 players and ~2,000 staff, whilst retainning just the players for the challenge teams adds ~1,000 players and 200 staff. Also retaining all english players on the small database gives you a bigger database than the default large database - so retaining all english players on low spec machines may not be good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.