Guest Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Whether it's a flaw or not is debatable. Default setting in FM is that even the league where you're managing is not set to full detail. I believe many people never even change these settings. i7 3770 is also 400 MHz slower. This is not correct, every competition that your team is entered in is set to full detail & cannot be downgraded, you're right that many people probably don't change these settings for other competitions which is why we see threads asking whether FM supports multi-core/hyper-threading as only full detail match processing takes advantage of all available physical & virtual cores. As for the clock speed even at the stock speed the 3770 should cream my overclocked 920 when all 8 cores of both cpu's are being used & I'd be disappointed that it doesn't when FM is not utilising H/T although that disappointment would be more directed at FM rather than an issue with the chip. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
yugo23 Posted June 14, 2012 Author Share Posted June 14, 2012 You are correct about detail level of the competitions your team is entered. Still, it's only one league out of 10/20/30/xy you select. Speed difference between running default/full detail is more than double from my experience. You get all cores to work, still processing speed is halved. You do get most accurate results, but aren't the default ones quite OK? I wish we had more i7 920 results, as the other one is half minute slower. What mostly interests me is difference between 2600K and 2500K at the same clocks, and it's quite a lot, around or even more than half a minute (because of H/T?). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 There is always the forgotten factor of how well maintained people keep their OS & background programmes & as you say a larger sample of results for each processor would be preferable as the two results so far for the 920 might just represent the max upper & lower ends of the performance scale. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
yugo23 Posted June 19, 2012 Author Share Posted June 19, 2012 I still hope we will get to see what 5GHz+ 2600K is capable of. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
skemar007 Posted August 25, 2012 Share Posted August 25, 2012 QuadCore Intel Core i5-3570K, oc @ 4200 MHz RAM: 8GB(DDR3-1600 DDR3 SDRAM) OS: Win 7 64bit Time:3.07.97 This was the start of the game so i done another test when the season starts cos matches will be processing Time: 4.49.72 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GIBURROWS Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 The file has disappeared....? I wanted to see if my i3 could stumble over any of your times. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
yugo23 Posted August 27, 2012 Author Share Posted August 27, 2012 Reuploaded Depositfiles link from the first post also works. skemar007, can you please confirm that you have used this savegame for testing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nababaliw Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 From my laptop: CPU: i5 2430M CPU Frequency: 2400 MHz RAM: 6GB 800 MHz OS: Win 7 (64bit) Time: 6 min 21 sec Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Svenc Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 The file has disappeared....? I wanted to see if my i3 could stumble over any of your times. There is an i3 in the list already, which has finished around the 5 minutes mark. As you can see, there isn't that much of a difference amongst newer processors, as the text interval isn't that taxing to begin with for new machines and it's the full detail match simulation that benefits from faster processor architectures AND multiple cores alike. So much so that a benchmark graph looks more akin to application software rather than your typical game, where fast dual cores such as the i3 can often downright outperform quad cores of the previous generation, such as Phenom II X4 and Core 2 Quad. Not the case here. Usually lower speced mobile chips are another matter altogether, though. The argument against that and a question you have to ask yourself is of course: Who does really simulate a bigger number of leagues and competitions, each one, even, in their save in full detail? If you do, however, this benchmark will tell you only so much how FM will perform on your machine. In this save, even a handily spec'ed Core 2 Duo can do okayish. Not the case if you set it up differently. In this case, any older dual core processor (Core 2 Duo, Athlon X2, Athlon II X2) will finish way behind anything else. And an i3, which I own myself, will certainly be no equal to a much more expensive i5 clocked at the same speed, as is the case here*. * As I personally simulate only a number of competitions loaded in full detail, this was quite useful to see though. It seems upgrading to an i5 will only take me so far. :-) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevie_G_32201 Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 This file does not exist, the access to the following file is limited or it has been removed due to infringement of copyright. Getting this message when attempting to download the save. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wanderer89 Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 The link in post 107 works. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
yugo23 Posted September 22, 2012 Author Share Posted September 22, 2012 I was interested to see how this little fellow from my HTPC will do. CPU: AMD Zacate E-350 CPU Frequency: 1600 MHz RAM: 4GB 1066 MHz OS: Win 7 Time: 22 min 45 sec Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mylo75 Posted September 25, 2012 Share Posted September 25, 2012 CPU: Intel Core i7 720 CPU Frequency: 2800 MHz RAM: 4GB 2000 MHz OS: Win 7 64 bit Time: 7 min 26 sec Ah man I thought my laptop would have been much faster Any suggestions to make my laptop run fm quicker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scribe Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 Sorry to bump this, but I thought it was an interesting thread and I wanted to check out my new PC CPU: i5 3570k CPU Frequency: 3.40GHz o/c @ 4.40GHz RAM: 8GB 1600 MHz OS: Win 7 64 bit Time: 4 min 17 sec Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unknown Imposter Posted October 21, 2012 Share Posted October 21, 2012 Good bump, Scribe. I'm thinking of buying a desktop to coincide with the new game because I'm frustrated by the speed of my Vaio and the 2 stars my graphics card gets on FM12 (1GB ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650). CPU: Intel® Core™ 2 Duo P8700 CPU Frequency: 2.53GHz RAM: 4GB DDR2 SDRAM/800MHz OS: Win 8 64 bit Time: 10 mins even Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gee_Simpson Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 Sorry for bumping this but is there a similar thread like this for FM 13? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
yugo23 Posted June 14, 2013 Author Share Posted June 14, 2013 New link - http://depositfiles.com/files/ac5z7asgk . For some reason I can't update link in post 1. If there is someone with new gen CPUs still playing FM12, I'd like to add those results. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wez007 Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 CPU: i7 3630QM IvyBridge CPU Frequency: 2.4GHZ, no O/C RAM: 16GB 1600 MHz OS: Win 7 64 bit Time: 4 min 9 sec edit, this is for a Clevo Custom built laptop so spec is mobile based. No need to O/C the the Cpu due to quad cores. Bit paranoid fiddlig with the oc so will leave as is Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave byrd Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 CPU: Intel Core i7 960 Bloomfield CPU Frequency: 3200 MHz (no O/C) RAM: 12GB 1600MHz OS: Win 7 64 bit Time: 5 min 30 secs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
yugo23 Posted June 30, 2013 Author Share Posted June 30, 2013 CPU: Intel i5 2500K CPU Frequency: 3300 MHz RAM: 4GB 1333MHz CL9 OS: Win 7 64 bit Time: 5 min 07 secs and CPU: Intel i5 2500K CPU Frequency: 3300 MHz RAM: 4GB 1333MHz CL6 OS: Win 7 64 bit Time: 4 min 53 secs I am on H61 chipset atm, when I get Z77 mobo I will try with OC. This exact specimen is capable of 5,2 GHz. Can't wait. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
roykela Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 CPU: Intel Core I7 3820 CPU Frequency: 3600 MHz RAM: 8GB 1666 MHz (3.5GB due to 32-bit OS) OS: Win Vista Time: 5 min 11 sec Just had an upgrade of my computer and was curious to see how much different it would be from my previous setup. Had a Core 2 Quad Q6700 before, OC'd to 3340MHZ, and 8GB 800MHz on a Win 7 64-bit. That got the time 8 min 52 sec. My newer system is faster but i thought it would be a bit better than that time. Ah, well. It's definitely a difference and i'm happy with that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
roykela Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 That is true. Had to order a new Windows 7 license and i'm waiting for that to show itself in the mailbox. Well....the dvd of course That is 64-bit so there should be a tiny improvement there as well. Will definitely be a very significant difference in the long run. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nik_Dut Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 I got a 6 years old machine, so I'm afraid if i test it will take an eternity, the world collapsed and Mars overshadowed earth during the whole process ;p Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
t-zolla Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 Probably worth bumping this, just in case anybody is looking for a new machine this year... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q.P.R Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 Well iv got the brand new I7 4820k and it eats this game up with so so so much ease .. I am so happy with my build that I even done a video on it . http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J__3wANR2d4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
yugo23 Posted October 27, 2013 Author Share Posted October 27, 2013 Once FM14 is released, expect new version of this benchmark. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
roykela Posted October 27, 2013 Share Posted October 27, 2013 Nice. Will be interesting to see how my setup will do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rookie FM Posted October 27, 2013 Share Posted October 27, 2013 Had anyone got i7 4770k with 8GB Ram? I am sure it will beat 3 mins 19 Seconds! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fabioke Posted October 28, 2013 Share Posted October 28, 2013 Once FM14 is released, expect new version of this benchmark. I'm looking forward to it! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtal191 Posted October 31, 2013 Share Posted October 31, 2013 Anyone have any benchmarks of an FX6300? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
yugo23 Posted November 2, 2013 Author Share Posted November 2, 2013 Football Manager 14 Bencnmark Thread Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.