Can you spot the error...

Am I missing something ? all above board here as I see it

I can't see an obvious error either.

Headres 57% - 56%

Or Cech making numerous saves even though they only had one shot at goal?

Only thing I can see is that it says Cech made numerous keys saves but Benfica only had 1 shot on target.

I hate these games, just tell us

headers won 57% - 56% ?

They are both out of 100%, so Chelsea won 57% of their headers and Benfica won 56% of theirs.

Hmm I can't seem to see the stat image in firefox - I'm satisfied that is the error

Is it that Petr Cech made "numerous key saves" despite there being only 1 shot on target. Also how did he get man of the match if he only saved one shot.

Is it that Petr Cech made "numerous key saves" despite there being only 1 shot on target. Also how did he get man of the match if he only saved one shot.

Wouldn't catching a cross count as a save

They are both out of 100%, so Chelsea won 57% of their headers and Benfica won 56% of theirs.

Yeah, I know how it works, but headers won should be aganist an opponment and should be a duel ergo it should basicly be 100% total. If they player heading the ball had no opponment going after the ball aswell it wasn't really a heading won. it was a heading done.

I was just wondering if that was what he ment although I figured it had to be Cech

At least your game is working...

You were given 3 minutes of extra time, but the clock shows 4 minutes and 47 seconds?

You were given 3 minutes of extra time, but the clock shows 4 minutes and 47 seconds?

Now that ALWAYS happens to me,

He is offline so we won't find out tonight I don't think

Wooah. Definately a 40 yard screamer and candidate for most abstract and weird thread of the season!

4 blcked shots and ONE shot on target? HOW?

It was going wide?

4 blcked shots and ONE shot on target? HOW?

I'm still waiting for the punch line tbh ..

4 blcked shots and ONE shot on target? HOW?

it's not 4 blocked and 1 on target. It is 1 on target and 4 off target. wide or over the bar

He is defenatly thinking of Cech doing several key saves even though they only had 1 shot on target.

As the first to say it I expect a huge cashprize when he gets back online

They are both out of 100%, so Chelsea won 57% of their headers and Benfica won 56% of theirs.

its out of 100% for them so out of 10 headers if they won 5 that wud be 50% its not vs oppenet but i cant see any

All i no his is that his assiant does press confrences

4 blcked shots and ONE shot on target? HOW?

Or as it suggests, the shot was attempted but was blocked by defenders or any other opposition player?

it's not 4 blocked and 1 on target. It is 1 on target and 4 off target. wide or over the bar

He is defenatly thinking of Cech doing several key saves even though they only had 1 shot on target.

As the first to say it I expect a huge cashprize when he gets back online

I would love it if you was wrong and all of this was a wind up

Tune in tomorrow to find out!

In the mean time, I'm sure it will run to 30 pages and end with Wakers falling out with everyone. :thup:

Like most things, its down to interpretation - which makes this a highly random thread without the possibility of a definitive answer (unless of course I'm missing the point or possibly losing the plot - but good luck to all regardless

Is it the r after the time? Dont recall seeing that before but then again i dont remember what it should be either. An r just seems wrong.

scored two goals with only four clear cut chances and less than 20 shots?

on a serious note its gotta be cech's MoM with one save

Tune in tomorrow to find out!

In the mean time, I'm sure it will run to 30 pages and end with Wakers falling out with everyone. :thup:

Huh? Most obscure mention of my name ever

I bet Cech got an assist in that game, hence his overly high rating.

Now who wants to fight!?

Can a clear cut chance be blocked? If it cant then Benfica have too many blocked/clear cut chances to shots.

You were given 3 minutes of extra time, but the clock shows 4 minutes and 47 seconds?

Minimum of 3 minutes

Minimum of 3 minutes

How does that work? I always knew the + sign as an expression of how long of added time there is, not a minimum of it.

How does that work? I always knew the + sign as an expression of how long of added time there is, not a minimum of it.

At Football matches the announcer calls it as (The fourth official has indicated a minimum of two minutes added, two minutes added time) so yes, it is a minimum.

Well, I guess you learn something new everyday. Interesting.

Well, I guess you learn something new everyday. Interesting.

You sure do mate,

I would still love to know what the OP was talking about.

is it were it says cech made numerous key saves but match stats say one on target?

let us know man

You sure do mate,

I would still love to know what the OP was talking about.

Has he still not told us the [official] answer?

edit: i didn't offend you did i peter :o you still haven't replied in the thread we sorta took over.

KingK, the master of suspense!

he's forgotten about this probably

Has he still not told us the [official] answer?

edit: i didn't offend you did i peter :o you still haven't replied in the thread we sorta took over.

What thread

yes small Mac, it must be the MoM thing.

he's forgotten about this probably

I wouldn't be suprised. He could have just told us, and put 'spoiler tag' round it, for the sado's that like endless guessing games

Is it that they won 100% of tackles and still committed 11 fouls :guess:

Is it that they won 100% of tackles and still committed 11 fouls :guess:

Now that is something we haven't considered.

I can't believe I am agreeing with you Mark after you revealing my rant on another topic

Now that is something we haven't considered.

I can't believe I am agreeing with you Mark after you revealing my rant on another topic

Sly is my middle name

Sly is my middle name

you bet, I refuse to look in that thread now ... Atleast you are being alright with me now

you bet, I refuse to look in that thread now ... Atleast you are being alright with me now

It wasn't fury or rage (there's been worse, trust me) but a bit of annoyance when people say things like that. We've all been newbies before, haven't we?

It wasn't fury or rage (there's been worse, trust me) but a bit of annoyance when people say things like that. We've all been newbies before, haven't we?

Yes we have but it deeply annoys me when people post without giving any reasons.

the headers stat isnt measured as out of 100% across both teams - the opposition may not challenge for headers on every occasion so the headers stat reflects the amount of times a play went to head the ball and won it.

thanks for playing tho