leedsfan88 Posted May 12, 2009 Share Posted May 12, 2009 Am i only one who thinks its not cheating to remove the sugar daddy option for man city after 10 season. No club owners could continue to splash the cash for 10 straight years Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluemoon1992 Posted May 12, 2009 Share Posted May 12, 2009 we could pal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC_1972 Posted May 12, 2009 Share Posted May 12, 2009 It is cheating. But, I didn't see you do it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koennn Posted May 12, 2009 Share Posted May 12, 2009 Well since the group that took over City has an estimated amount of 550 billion dollars at it's disposal I guess they could.. But if you think it's unfair of course you can turn off their sugar daddy, I won't complain Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stantoner Posted May 12, 2009 Share Posted May 12, 2009 its your game, do what you will Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Major Posted May 12, 2009 Share Posted May 12, 2009 On FM editor sugar daddy box isn't clicked What is it in the editor that ensures they have so much cash? Is it the actual chairman , because I know he has 20 for funds. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shanks Posted May 12, 2009 Share Posted May 12, 2009 there is an EDT file that contains Man City's sugar daddy info. It's in the game db folder in My computer/Sports Interactive/db/EDT i think or something like that basically its an extra file in the database not ticked on the editor Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koennn Posted May 12, 2009 Share Posted May 12, 2009 I believe it's in an edt file Edit: ah shanks beat me to it.. should've refreshed the page before posting Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flek Posted May 12, 2009 Share Posted May 12, 2009 I dont't believe they will ever splash as much as it has been hyped... Look Abramovich... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevicus Posted May 12, 2009 Share Posted May 12, 2009 The "is this cheating" threads are getting tedious now:D But i wouldn't call that cheating myself, especially as City do not actually put the money to good use in the game, usually buy loads of mediocre players for stupid money and stick them in the reserves. It's actually balancing out the transfer market in a way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dale Gribble Posted May 12, 2009 Share Posted May 12, 2009 In all fairness, they are approx 50x as rich as Ambramovic, there is no way they could ever dream of managing to spend all their money, so they could keep splashing if they wanted. I imagine they'll get bored a few years though when they realize it isn't as simple as just chucking money at the problem, a.k.a Kaka. Fingers crossed anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leedsfan88 Posted May 13, 2009 Author Share Posted May 13, 2009 Thats what i'm saying that after a few years in real life they will in all likelihood stop spending 250 mln a year on transfers, its ten seasons in and i'm planning on disabling the option at the start of season 11. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehig2 Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 Man City are an advantage, they buy loads of average players, play them in their reserves, and then a few years on you can buy those players on the cheap. Love raiding city reserves. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Major Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 How do the City finances work? Do they just refill the coffers if you go into the red, or sooner? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duckers4 Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 It depends how you look at it. You could decide that they wouldnt spend a load of money and therefore take it out. Or you could let the game decide and manage in a world were you only have control of your destiny and not other teams. At the end of the day its your game and you can do what you want! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenArsenal Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 Am i only one who thinks its not cheating to remove the sugar daddy option for man city after 10 season.No club owners could continue to splash the cash for 10 straight years How would you know for sure? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephanie McMahon's Secret Lover Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 No I am sure you are not the only one and that there are plenty of other cheats who think its not cheating too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blanchflower1 Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 its your game, do what you will That is quite right mate!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
backpackant Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 Man City are an advantage, they buy loads of average players, play them in their reserves, and then a few years on you can buy those players on the cheap.Love raiding city reserves. Yeah, I got Bentnar for my newly relegated Portsmouth side for £1million, plus a couple of loans. He got 4 goals in 3 matches. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.