EdH1977 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Hi, I used to play champ man and came back to FM when FMC was introduced, the full version looks very complex, but just wondered what you thought the main differences were in relation to tactics etc, is it massively different? Just curious. Cheers Ed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sikker Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Tactics is the exact same whether you play FM or FMC. On FMC you don't do team talks and opposition instructions. You don't have to take care of training, but you can if you want. No constant harassment from news in FMC either. All in all you get the good stuff and doesn't need to take care of the bad stuff when playing FMC Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vasilli07 Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 I just convert to FMC this year. Really liking it without too much media and player interaction. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ifail Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 I rather have player revolts and money problems than FMC it brings the stress to gaming Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyro Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 I rather have player revolts and money problems than FMC it brings the stress to gaming Never heard that FMC is more stressy than FM full. People certainly have their views about FMC but most that I have interacted with agree that it is more "fun" / "faster" / "less annoying." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dagenham_Dave Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 FMC is great, but anytime I get really involved in a great save on it (had two belters on FM14), I then start to wish it was on the full game to make use of the features that I miss from it, so it's a double edged sword sometimes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shirajzl Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 I miss only minor things in FMC, like not being able to set the intensity of player individual training or not having the analysis tab, but otherwise FMC offers far less annoying moments and rage, even when I'm not doing well. FMC cuts down on repetitive things like media interaction and irritating features like player interactions and team meetings with illogical reactions of players etc, while keeping the spirit and realism to a sufficient degree. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyro Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 I miss only minor things in FMC, like not being able to set the intensity of player individual training or not having the analysis tab, but otherwise FMC offers far less annoying moments and rage, even when I'm not doing well.FMC cuts down on repetitive things like media interaction and irritating features like player interactions and team meetings with illogical reactions of players etc, while keeping the spirit and realism to a sufficient degree. This is no longer true for FMC15. Individual training is possible now. Edit: Re-read. Intensity I am not sure about. But individual training in general yes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shirajzl Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 This is no longer true for FMC15. Individual training is possible now.Edit: Re-read. Intensity I am not sure about. But individual training in general yes. I am sure because I'm playing it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maw74 Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 I rather have player revolts and money problems than FMC it brings the stress to gaming Who says you can't have money problems in FMC? and I'm also sure you can have stress in FMC. To be blunt FMC cuts out all the crap. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
daylight Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 To be blunt FMC cuts out all the crap. ...but some of us like that 'crap'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shirajzl Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 ...but some of us like that 'crap'. Which is perfectly fine, it doesn't have to be "us vs them" thing. If one thinks media interaction is superfluous and pointless, if one thinks player interactions are buggy and unrealistic, that team talks produce illogical responses etc., the answer is FMC. If on the other hand, one likes all those features as they are, there's nothing to complain, only to enjoy the game. It's another kettle of fish that a lot of people consider playing FMC below them, even though it sounds perfectly suited for them based on their posts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.