HakanMild Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 Here are 2 fake players (made using the editor), which striker would you prefer to have on your team? Also what do you think is similar with these players? Player 1 - Felix full size image: http://img546.imageshack.us/img546/1872/50563752.jpg Player 2 - Dragomir full size image: http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/9859/78395674.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTL Master Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 Hm i reckon the top one would be more effective, as a poacher and possibly an advanced forward. I have had players similar to the second player before and it is often hard to get the best out of them. Would play the 2nd one complete forward. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTL Master Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 Just seen the first players agility and balance :o... not a poacher then... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quboid Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 The 2nd one, he lacks pace but with the right players around him, he'd be a monster. I wouldn't be unhappy with either of them TBH Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyle_123 Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 are these real players? That second dude is immense. I dont think ive ever seen that many 20's ever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
THOG Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 Dragomir because his name is awesome. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLS Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 The first one, it wouldn't feel like cheating as much as I'd be playing with Lionel Messi instead of God. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
burak700 Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 Definitely the second one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KYMYK Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 The 2nd one. Captain, Leader, Legend. In fact you should train him as a DC. The perfect defender. P.S.: Fellow Romanian. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gusano Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 you probably used FMRTE as with the editor, the stats for the second player would all be less than 14 with maybe a couple 20s. Just wait and watch as your second player have all their attributes go down and up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ackter Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 Whichever one performs better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggy2011 Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 Why not just play both together? haha Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tez01979 Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 There is only one way to find out..............FIGHT!!!!!!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HakanMild Posted October 23, 2011 Author Share Posted October 23, 2011 you probably used FMRTE as with the editor, the stats for the second player would all be less than 14 with maybe a couple 20s. Just wait and watch as your second player have all their attributes go down and up. Wrong. I asked what do you guys think is similar between the two? Well both of them have the same CA (Current Ability) : 200. One is heavily swayed towards having all attributes necessaries in a good striker, then the other I put high attributes in all other areas. Speed takes up a lot. The one player has so many 20s because of attribute weighting. E.g. Giving a striker a 10 in pace takes up as many ability points as giving him 20 in agility. Therefore giving him high attributes in marking, tackling takes up little of his ability points. I took the numbers from this thread: http://community.sigames.com/showthread.php/197595-Attribute-Weighting?p=5024058&viewfull=1#post5024058 Therefore (IMO) the second player is the best you could get a player's attributes to look, the only thing I would change is giving him a 20 in flair instead of 14 because that takes no extra ability points. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gusano Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 Wrong. I asked what do you guys think is similar between the two? Well both of them have the same CA (Current Ability) : 200. One is heavily swayed towards having all attributes necessaries in a good striker, then the other I put high attributes in all other areas. Speed takes up a lot.The one player has so many 20s because of attribute weighting. E.g. Giving a striker a 10 in pace takes up as many ability points as giving him 20 in agility. Therefore giving him high attributes in marking, tackling takes up little of his ability points. I took the numbers from this thread: http://community.sigames.com/showthread.php/197595-Attribute-Weighting?p=5024058&viewfull=1#post5024058 Therefore (IMO) the second player is the best you could get a player's attributes to look, the only thing I would change is giving him a 20 in flair instead of 14 because that takes no extra ability points. Which player is better? which striker would you prefer to have on your team? It seems as if you answered your own question. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HakanMild Posted October 23, 2011 Author Share Posted October 23, 2011 It seems as if you answered your own question. I was putting out the question there for the forum, I gave my opinion (indicated with an IMO), so I wanted to hear what others thought. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCIAG Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 Definitely Dragomir. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazaru5 Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 I'd retrain the second one to an AMC Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HakanMild Posted October 23, 2011 Author Share Posted October 23, 2011 I'd retrain the second one to an AMC That would actually cause his attributes to drop due to attribute weighting for AMC being different than ST. Of course he is better suited for AMC, deep lying forward is probably his best option. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robilaz Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 Haha, that second guy is a BEAST!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay96 Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 I'd have the second guy, cos I always play one up top and he's made for it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FollowFollow54 Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 The second one is easily better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.