Nathanial Clyne

Nathanial Clyne is a young Rightback who starts out at crystal palace hes quick and will probably make the england 1st team one day, he doesnt cost much and is worth a try. An added bonus is that he can also play leftback if needed and that is where i have been playing him now for about 3 years.

He is a good player. If im looking for a back up right back I usually try for him. How much did you get him for mate.

925K bargain IMO for an England international.

925K bargain IMO for an England international.

That is mate. Is that at the start of the first season 10.3? If it is the cheapest I can get him for is £2.2m

Probably not the best time to post a screenshot of him up

He has been playing woeful for you, judging by that picture. Seen as fullbacks usually get very high ratings (usually 7+ most games) - he doesn't seem to be that great.

Maybe he is out of his depth at Liverpool?

He's average really. Who cares if he is an England international, just goes to show how poor England team is. Aurier is twice the player.

Looks like an unbelievable Championship player, and maybe a mid-table, lower Premiership player. Definately looks out of his depth at Liverpool looking at his form though

Well he has been playing at leftback

Bit harsh to judge his average-rating after 5 games..

Bit harsh to judge his average-rating after 5 games..

No it isn't.

If you are playing at the top level, you have to be performing week in and week out.

He's usually been quality for me.

If Palace go down in the first season (which has happened on my last three saves) he can be picked up for pittance, too. I had an offer of £70k accepted no problems. My scout said he would have been available for £2k (!!!), I wasn't sure if I believed him though and wanted to get to the head of the queue for his signature!

Cheers.

No it isn't.

If you are playing at the top level, you have to be performing week in and week out.

Bad Tyoldinho Clyne is very good

No it isn't.

If you are playing at the top level, you have to be performing week in and week out.

If he has made a mistake leading to a goal in one game, the other 4 games wont give him enough time to make the average rating up, will it? Unless he plays like a monster. And if he has been playing LB, then he wont be playing like a monster if he isn't accomplished there...

By the looks of it, he did badly in the cup - Charity Sheild? Playing out of position against a top RW, a 5.9 isn't too bad. But this is conjecture.

If he has made a mistake leading to a goal in one game, the other 4 games wont give him enough time to make the average rating up, will it? Unless he plays like a monster. And if he has been playing LB, then he wont be playing like a monster if he isn't accomplished there...

By the looks of it, he did badly in the cup - Charity Sheild? Playing out of position against a top RW, a 5.9 isn't too bad. But this is conjecture.

Well, he says he has been playing him there for 3 years, so I would presume he is accomplished by now.

So if he is playing against a top RW, then it proves that this guy isn't a 'top' player doesn't it surely? He hasn't got the skill level required to compete with the 'top players'.

So again, he is probably out of his depth at Liverpool and most likely deserves his bad ratings.

He is a very good player and more than good enough for Liverpool after a few seasons, great physical stats too

Looking at his stats he should be a decent enough player for a mid table team like Liverpool ( ).

Great athlete, but with those mental and technical stats he can only be a backup/utility player at a top club.

Always been interested in this guy. But everytime I check his stats I just don't think he would be able to handle top 4 premier leauge football (or something comparitive). He just doesn't look good enough to me. But I am always very specific about my fullbacks/wingbacks as I always want the best.

Cesar Aziplicueta (sp?) would be preferred young RB choice.

i guess as a cheap english back up he's decent, but as has been said before, players like Aurier will turn out much better

No it isn't.

If you are playing at the top level, you have to be performing week in and week out.

I think you're being harsh. De Silvestri, who I always signed on previous FMs because he becomes incredible, always started my seasons really, really poorly for some reason, yet he'd then go on a run of 25 games getting 7.0 at least.