aderow Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 I found this guy last year playing in the middle east and I got him 700k...which I think was a really good deal. My issue is I have my starting MCs and I have Kroos and Gourcuff rotating with them. Now Kroos I'm not going to let go of because I watched him turn into a monster. SO if I am to keep Gourcuff, I would have to sell this guy. So if you were me, would you sell zahariev and keep gourcuff (who is making 165k a wk btw)? or vice versa? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
milnerpoint Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 i would keep all three, that guy has a poor natural fitness, chances are he will be injury prone, so you will need cover, plus if he is back up he is a fantastic player to have in your squad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnfieldRoad10 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 I think i'd wait a little while before selling him, give him time for his valuation to go up a bit more, otherwise you're not going to make much of a profit on what is undoubtedly a very good player. With Gourcuff, all depends on how he's playing...what are his stats like in comparison to this guy? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
busngabb Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Why would you need to sell him? You need two players of the same quality for every position IMO so keep them all. He is too good to sell, certainly for the valuation he is at currently. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lloydey1 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 At Man Utd you need more than 2 central midfielders... and he is only 21 this guy could become a great player with some tutoring by a hard working player (eg a Fletcher type player). Look at the current Man Utd midfielders in the first team squad (Fletch, Scholes, Carrick, Anderson, Gibson, Giggs etc) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
underwater sunlight Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 he looks good enough for the first team so i would keep him. if you are in all competitions you need squad depth and as said above, you want 2 players for each position Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Sutton Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 that player as some amazing stats! sell him plz! if you dont have faith in him im sure barca or madrid will take him ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rancer890 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 He's on relatively low wages and you need depth. So keep him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gandy Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 I’d keep him. Adds to depth. Sell him when he turns 28 and peaks, or when you have adequate cover to replace him (cheaper probably), whichever comes first. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
busngabb Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 I've changed my mind. Sell him to Everton. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aderow Posted January 22, 2011 Author Share Posted January 22, 2011 Why would you need to sell him? You need two players of the same quality for every position IMO so keep them all. He is too good to sell, certainly for the valuation he is at currently. I know. The thing is, in my 3 man midfield (2 playmaking 1 covering), I have 5 playmaking mids. I only really need 4. Plus I have this kid sitting in the reserves: With Gourcuff, all depends on how he's playing...what are his stats like in comparison to this guy? Here's gourcuff in my save: i would keep all three, that guy has a poor natural fitness, chances are he will be injury prone, so you will need cover, plus if he is back up he is a fantastic player to have in your squad. His lack of natural fitness is sort of why I am likely to sell him... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blade79 Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 loan the kid to get a full season of games (make sure you loan him to team that want him as valuable player) . rotting on your reserves will do him no favours. the other guy is a good backup Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maidel Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 He same issue. I play one up front, so I don't need that many strikers. I have van Perdue who is now 30, and scores goals for fun (about 1 a game for the last 3 years!) I have a 19 year old Danish regen who is absolutely spectacular I have lukalu back from his loan spell with stuggart where he scored 25 in 30 games I sold andy carrol who had been my reserve striker last year because he only ever scored with his head, but how do I keep 3 strikers happy, I can't bare to sell one of them, but I equally don't wNt a sulking lukalu, that's why I loaned him in the first place. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MP40 Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 Holy crap that's a fine selection of players you have there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
manunited4life123 Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 Keep him. Can't leave that talent get away. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
underwater sunlight Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 let him out on loan for a season. he needs games to improve more so give him the opportunity. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aderow Posted January 22, 2011 Author Share Posted January 22, 2011 loan the kid to get a full season of games (make sure you loan him to team that want him as valuable player) . rotting on your reserves will do him no favours. the other guy is a good backup If you're talking about palmer, you don't need to tell me that. He's spent the last year and a half on loan at west ham and southampton Holy crap that's a fine selection of players you have there. I'd like to think I do well fro myself Keep him. Can't leave that talent get away. But if he continues not to play, he will start complaining and eventually request a transfer. let him out on loan for a season. he needs games to improve more so give him the opportunity. Who are you talking about.....zahariev or palmer? If you're talking about zahariev, that sounds like a good idea because he will like improve his value which will be nice if I decide to sell him. Well, lucky for me, since his value is so low right now I'm not going to make my decision yet. I just hope players don't start complaining about a lack of playing time.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.