nev147 Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 Ok so I have just bought the newgen below who is natural as both an attacking midfielder left and midfielder left and is all so accomplished as a defender left (as seen below). So as he was pretty good in both positions, I thought he would be perfect as an attacking/automatic wing back - but he is ineffectual as a left wing back! How can this be? As seen below surely it would make sense that if he can play as both a winger and a full back then surely he would be perfect as a wing back or at the very least could play there pretty easily in terms of his compatibility. Am I missing something here? I know a simple bit of positional training will solve this but I believe he should be at least accomplished as a wing back. So guys am I wrong in thinking he should be able to play as a wing back or should he. And if you feel just becasue he can play as a winger and full back does not mean he can play as a wing back can you please say why please. Cheers guys! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
afced7 Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 IRL he'd make a good wing back but with regens the game just gives players almost 'random' positions if you see what I mean. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nev147 Posted April 17, 2010 Author Share Posted April 17, 2010 IRL he'd make a good wing back but with regens the game just gives players almost 'random' positions if you see what I mean. Yeah that seems to be the case here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonnyGabriel Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nev147 Posted April 17, 2010 Author Share Posted April 17, 2010 Retrain him as a wing back? Yeah I said in the OP I would train him as a wing back - so its not a long term problem but just thought it was a bit unrealistic that he could not play there to start with. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dafuge Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 Perhaps because positioning is not a strength of his, he prefers another player playing either in front or behind him. As he looks quite attacking, perhaps he struggles to find the balance between attacking and defending that is key for a wing back? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nev147 Posted April 17, 2010 Author Share Posted April 17, 2010 Perhaps because positioning is not a strength of his, he prefers another player playing either in front or behind him. As he looks quite attacking, perhaps he struggles to find the balance between attacking and defending that is key for a wing back? Yeah I take your point but I believe it is an error on behalf of SI. It would be like a runner been able to be very good at the 100m and 200m but not being able to run 150m! (I know silly example but I just feel its not very realistic) It would be a bit like a player who could play at CB and MC but not being able to play DM. But I think your point is very valid and does make me look at it in a different light! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dafuge Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 Another idea is that in his life he has never played in a team that used wing backs, so doesn't know the role. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCIAG Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 It seems odd that players like this exist. I could understand if they had a low rating as a WBL, but no rating at all? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scath Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 I'd almost wonder if there should be a system whereby playing a player in a certain position can slightly improve their rating in it. After all, a huge number of players start off life as a winger and end up as a centre back or whatever. Sure wasn't Sol Campbell a striker the first time he was in a Champ Manager way back when? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dafuge Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 I'd almost wonder if there should be a system whereby playing a player in a certain position can slightly improve their rating in it.After all, a huge number of players start off life as a winger and end up as a centre back or whatever. Sure wasn't Sol Campbell a striker the first time he was in a Champ Manager way back when? I thought it already does, although that may only be when you are also training them in it. Yes, Sol started his career as a striker. Scored on his Spurs debut I believe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katarian Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 You can often find newgens with odd positions. I mean how many players in the starting database are only proficent at AMC, AML/R, or WBL, but once the newgens come in there are loads. One thing you might consider is that the AI managers love training players in new positions, I've taken over clubs and found 7-8 players being retrained. So his old club may have trained him at LB rather then being generated with Accomplished LB. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaeltmurrayuk Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 As Katarian has said it looks like the AI team you bought him from has retrained him as a left back rather than him being generated with the left back position, if the AI did train him as a left back and you don't play him there you'll notice over time that his ability to play left back will drop. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingjericho Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 yep^^ my guess would also be that he was generated being only a mid and attacking mid and he was retrained as a defender Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nev147 Posted April 18, 2010 Author Share Posted April 18, 2010 As Katarian has said it looks like the AI team you bought him from has retrained him as a left back rather than him being generated with the left back position, if the AI did train him as a left back and you don't play him there you'll notice over time that his ability to play left back will drop. yep^^ my guess would also be that he was generated being only a mid and attacking mid and he was retrained as a defender You can often find newgens with odd positions. I mean how many players in the starting database are only proficent at AMC, AML/R, or WBL, but once the newgens come in there are loads.One thing you might consider is that the AI managers love training players in new positions, I've taken over clubs and found 7-8 players being retrained. So his old club may have trained him at LB rather then being generated with Accomplished LB. Yes that could well be the case and it is a very interesting point - but having been a natural at LM and AML and being retrained as a LB - then surely once the player was trained as a LB he should have become at least competent at LWB or even better? So it kind of goes back to my original point that once the LB was established then the LWB was kind of prerequisite- the opposite of mutually exclusive if that makes sense! Would that be potentially inclusive!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephanie McMahon's Secret Lover Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Its all about his position. In real life I have used excellent players who can play as both full backs and wingers however, once you mention the word "wingback" they look at you as if you're speaking in a foreign language. Then they go out there and perform badly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nev147 Posted April 18, 2010 Author Share Posted April 18, 2010 Its all about his position. In real life I have used excellent players who can play as both full backs and wingers however' date=' once you mention the word "wingback" they look at you as if you're speaking in a foreign language. Then they go out there and perform badly.[/quote']Yeah the mental approach of the player is something that I did not really consider. But if the manager said RWB it would be alot more understandable - as the player had any any sense about him would think apply both his attacking qualities of AML and his defensive duties as a LB and incorporate them together - but yes i do appreciate that it is may be a lot harder in practise. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.