super keeper poll

[ArranoBeltza]

It happens almost every single time I have a striker break away or one of my players hits a beautiful free kick. In fact, I just had a very nice freekick denied.

It's okay if it happens, but seriously, my strikers rarely score one-on-one and freekicks are nearly impossible to get in.

[inrep#]

Ben Foster:( and Robert Green:mad: are GODS! When they play against me!

[charlo116]

I saw the first 10 match rating i've ever out of fm 09 and fm 10, when my liverpool side played man utd. They had 3 CCC and scored three i had 11 CCC and scored 3. Foster stopped nearly everything i threw at him and i only drew even though man utd's defence couldn't cope with my attack.

There is a bit of a problem but i have faith in 10.3 and i'll make my judgement then.

[3rBaWi]

The problem is not the keeper

The problem is with the ****** players shooting one on ones straight at the keeper ..

[Vic Taylor]

The problem is not the keeper

The problem is with the ****** players shooting one on ones straight at the keeper ..

The problem is neither.

The problem is the excess of CCC being created. The saves the keepers make, and the players' finishing is designed to balance out the ME, and stop every game finishing, for example, 8-7.

[Swindon69]

I do know that opposing keepers in my game are statistically twice as likely as my keeper to make great/fantastic saves because I made a note of each an every one over 4 seasons.

[InterWolf]

Stop talking about collecting data. If you ask twenty people in the street the orbital velocity of the moon, you will not get a meaningful result. This is similar.

You want actual data? Count the number of one on ones in a season, scored and missed, then do the same for real life.

But as the problem has been acknowledged by SI, I don't see what you're getting at.

[Swindon69]

Wow what a strange arguement - don't collect data.

So how does collecting data invalidate my point that opposition keepers are twice as likely to produce great/fantastic saves. Note I'm not talking about 1 on 1's.

[samb_95]

I don't get the fact that when I play well, their keeper plays well, but when the oppostion play well, my keeper unfortunately doesn't play as well, even though I have a better keeper

[ManUTactician247]

No problem for me, I have a 3.5 star keeper and a 2 star keeper

There's a clear difference for me from watching them play

[ArranoBeltza]

I'm currently playing as Lazio right now and have noticed something strange:

I usually play Mauro Zarate (Poacher/att) and Tommaso Rocchi (target man/supp) up front. When one-on-one, Zarate hardly ever scores. Rocchi, though, has seemed to be able to break through and score sometimes in one-on-ones (still less than he should, though). Some may say it's due to stats and I would agree, however, I have Vaclav Kadlec in my team and I have subbed him in sometimes and now Zarate is currently injured, so Kadlec gets more starts. Kadlec, unlike Zarate, has been able to score some in one-on-ones, while Zarate, a MUCH better player, is inept in this regard.

What the hell??:confused:

[james170288]

i think keepers are too good on fm 10.2, i think too many clear one on one chances are missed, but a lot of the team it is down to strikers hitting it straight at the keeper, and these are strikers like zlatan and villa as well as danny north and adam proudlock. i have to say though it is the same for all the keepers i have had so i dont believe it is just oppo keepers.