Kenny O Brien Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 Am I correct in saying that you have a fair idea how good a player will become by looking at their stats at the age of 18/19. Is there not any circumstances where you have a pig of a player at the age of 19/20 who suddenly becomes Premiership/World Class when 28 or so... (not all top players were so good when they were 18) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eles Gergo Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 Well really you have to judge them by looking on how do they play. I saw some average players perform very good, and some very good players becoming flops. (there are hidden attributes that determine a player) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krald Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 goalkeepers tend to slowly keep improving somewhat even after 21, most outfield players do most of their growth before their 22nd birthday but may, occasionally slowly improve after that, there aren't really many players that massively improve past age 22 I feel. Really though, 21 is the age you judge a player and decide if he's on track or if he's not going to make it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chalky1989 Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 There were a few players I let go from my Liverpool team cheaply, around 20-21, and 5-6 years later they were doing fantastically, got a couple of them at my Spurs team. So occasionally a few will exceed expectations. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brose Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 Actually. 24 is the golden age. After which improvements would be pretty slow until they peak around the age of 27, 28 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jops14 Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 I think its a shame there arent more players who see some drastic improvement around the ages of 27. I mean it doesnt happen that often in real life, but it would be nice to see the odd late bloomer in game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
uusinjsh Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 Diego Forlan anyone? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slawbawn Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 Diego Forlan anyone? I wouldn't say so. I'd say it's a case of not adapting too well to the Premiership, and flourishing in La Liga. Shevchenko for example. Flourished in Serie A but flopped in the Premiership. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaron1606 Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 Jimmy Bullard? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooCooKaJoo Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 Jimmy Bullard? he's injured far too much Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaron1606 Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 He's surely still a good example of a 'late-bloomer'? He was about about 27 when he made it to the Premier League for the first time, and ended up getting into the England squad at one point. He's still Premier League class when fit, even if that is seemingly less often as the years go by.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahyeahok Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 Not the first time i've seen McAteer and slow in the same sentence.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCIAG Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 SI introduced new "development curves" for either FM2010 or FM09. Which Ferdinand would that be? Because Les was always a great goalscorer, and Rio was England's youngest ever defender and the best defender in the world at the age of 23. Anton is the complete opposite... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
endtime Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 SI introduced new "development curves" for either FM2010 or FM09. What development curves would those be? Because according to this thread, 95% of players reach their maximum potential at the age of 21. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCIAG Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 What development curves would those be? Because according to this thread, 95% of players reach their maximum potential at the age of 21. Firstly, I don't know exactly, I don't work for SI. Secondly, that thread shows no overall trend, merely a mass of data and individual player's progression. Thirdly, most of the players there keep progressing until the age of about 26, and never reach their potential. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.