ljwjones Posted December 31, 2012 Share Posted December 31, 2012 So here is the team I currently have: What tactic should I be looking to use, In France by the way. No matter how I play the team we concede to many to be a major force. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
akuji2012 Posted December 31, 2012 Share Posted December 31, 2012 fuss version 3 is the best tactic i have found in these forums Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ljwjones Posted December 31, 2012 Author Share Posted December 31, 2012 I was looking more for some numbers, like 442 or 4312. what people think those players would suit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fmFutbolManager Posted December 31, 2012 Share Posted December 31, 2012 This should be in the tactics forum. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedaye Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 You have a horrid team balance from the looks of it. FB CB CB FB DM DM CM CM CM ST would be my guess - far to many def minded players imho. You could maybe get away with an AM instead of one of the CM depending on players fit.......you need more attacking options as strikers and AM really or some width if you want to push a DM to CM and players out wide. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ljwjones Posted January 1, 2013 Author Share Posted January 1, 2013 You have a horrid team balance from the looks of it. FB CB CB FB DM DM CM CM CM ST would be my guess - far to many def minded players imho. Thanks for the opinion. I do realise I have a lot of players at the back which is why I am struggling to find a formation, I have just put the suggested formation a nice 4-2-3-0-1 and will keep the other two formations for now. But jsut got to get to January. My other two formation is a nice 4-2-1-2-1 stright down the middle. and a 4-1-1-2-2, thats 2 wingers AML and AMR then the tow 1's central. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedaye Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 No problem - I can't say it will produce great results but I am sure you can get some joy with player roles and counters. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayahr Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 You could also use a 4-0-3-2-1 with 2 defensive-minded MCs and 2 AMCs. Abit like France's '98 tactic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pearcey_90 Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 Need width MAJORLY in your team. I would play. Play 4-2-3-1 Your first choice back for as Support Fullbacks, and central defenders. Than a BWM defensive central mid (Garcia), Center mid support (Santos), than LW winger attack (Ayew) CAM Attacking Midfielder attacking (Adryan), RW Attacking winger attacking (Nem) than advanced forward attacking (Ayew). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dturtle1 Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 hey those players would suit a tactic similar to what i use in the scottish Prem its a 5-3-1-1 with wingbacks in the wingback position and a DM, so it actually looks like 3-3-2-1-1 I run it with 2 strikers instead of AMC and have one DM in defense one CM in support and 1 CM as AP in attack CB/c--CB/x--CB/c WB/s------DM/d------WB/s AP/a------CM/s IF/a DLF/s The Forward/Midfield roles and such might need tweaking as i said i run two forwards but the back 5 is tight.. In my Partick Thistle save we got promoted to the Premier League first season and currently sitting 3rd in Dec(tied 4 sec, Celtic got 9 point lead tho ) the back 5 is the original starting backs(except for the WB/r, he got poached but his replacement atm is prob worse In first seanon we were 1st in conceded goals by a big margin 2nd and where 2nd only to celtic( not bad considering we're 200-1 for the title ) anyway looking at the squad thats what i'd run, whose the team btw might give it a go edit actually u really need 2 use 2 DM's sooo many , with CB/c thyre set to Zonal btw with the stopper set to Man marking, made a big difference with te cover defenders actually covering ther flanks a bit more Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ljwjones Posted January 2, 2013 Author Share Posted January 2, 2013 Thanks all for your suggestions. The team is Olympique Marseille just with some changes made...bad changes i shall admit. I shall take a look at all the suggestions and get to work. I have now also signed a new striker(Ademilson) and looking for the future now. Currently playing my 4-1-1-2-2 formation which works alright but will not win me the league until i strengthen at the back,s o will have a look at the sugestionsand get to work :- ) cheers all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
isignedupfornorealreason Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 hey those players would suit a tactic similar to what i use in the scottish Premits a 5-3-1-1 with wingbacks in the wingback position and a DM, so it actually looks like 3-3-2-1-1 I run it with 2 strikers instead of AMC and have one DM in defense one CM in support and 1 CM as AP in attack CB/c--CB/x--CB/c WB/s------DM/d------WB/s AP/a------CM/s IF/a DLF That is a curious backline. I stopped using CB/x and CB/c because x would go forward and c would drop in the 'hole' when he really needs to follow and cover the opposing striker. That's why when I have 4 backline I leave them on Cb/D with man marking (if I see them charging off...) How does the double cover work? Do they both drop into the same area or do they cancel each other out and cover correctly? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dturtle1 Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 That is a curious backline. I stopped using CB/x and CB/c because x would go forward and c would drop in the 'hole' when he really needs to follow and cover the opposing striker. That's why when I have 4 backline I leave them on Cb/D with man marking (if I see them charging off...)How does the double cover work? Do they both drop into the same area or do they cancel each other out and cover correctly? Generally dont see much bunching in the center, they are both set to zone marking as well, what i do get is them covering the flanks a bit more... as in when my Wb is extended the covering CB will drop back into the channel, what i also get is the opposite CB to the opponent crossing is generally gets the clearing header,... as this only has 2 wide players, fb overlapping wingers is my bane and whilst i cant stop all the crosses going in i can stop them reaching their intended targets..., my DM/d normally locks up the 2nd striker Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigshow1 Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 Check out Icelander's channel on Youtube for excellent advice and ideas. Clips like the one below really opened my eyes to getting a team playing together. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOerdwlpUnE Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.