Jump to content

Johnny Ace

Moderators
  • Posts

    5,943
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Johnny Ace

  1. I like it, not a huge fan of a lone TF, but he's got plenty of attacking support around him
  2. I'd make no judgement based on that I think you could for a hands off type save, focus on the recruitment and training etc, could be fun
  3. I think the only way to get that sort of extreme movement would be to play Erikson at DM and trying to get him to move forward and to the right when attacking
  4. Work rate is pretty important but Team Work less so if you're wanting him as a goal getter
  5. Start out using the simple roles, so FB, WB, CD, DM, CM etc Roles are just a tag for a bunch of instructions, so they're not the be all and end all Once you get to know your players and what they are capable of, then start looking to add the more interesting roles
  6. Something like how you've set yours, looks fine that Then AM(S)/ AP(S) and AM(A)/ SS(A) with a AF(A)/ P(A) and a DLF(S)/CF(S)
  7. I like it! You could also try out a 2 AM - 2 STR box formation with the two wingbacks providing the width
  8. I'm not sure how far they go back on Steam, but may be worth checking out a few demos I always like FM17, I think FM15 was pretty decent too. They feel dated going back and playing those games now though
  9. I do love a 4-4-2 and always found out in FM, that simpler is better so be following with interest How did no one mention all the whiskey?
  10. I was thinking more long the lines of a 4-2-2-2 Box or a 4-4-2 Diamond, anything without wide attackers
  11. With a 4-2-3-1 DM, I find in FM that play will naturally go down the wings with the wide attackers and wingbacks. With both your both attackers on attack it will emphasise this I know you don't want to, but changing to a narrow shape can help
  12. Hmmm, try it out and see, I can't see it having any effect on centre backs and goal keepers
  13. The parts that stand out to me that could be stifling your team: The high press with lots of players getting forward ASAP Ultra Narrow width Ultra Short passing Be more disciplined Work ball into box - I hate this TI Time wasting Dribble less Play for set pieces Lower Tempo All negative type TIs, then: 7,000 Team Instructions
  14. Could be tactical, players need the space and chances to shoot in the first place so posting your tactic could help identify any chances to try
  15. Fantastic @Mik_Fe, now you have your base tactic
  16. FB's tuck inside too which help the team keep the ball No, but they dribble, stay wide and get forward more than FBs Playmakers play risky passes I did one here Could easily be a DLF(A) or CF(A) up front
  17. Yeah, I'm not fussed about possession, though I'm sure I did in the 4-3-3 DM thread, I'll have a look but any 4-3-3 with FBs over WBs is a good start Exactly, think about it, 3 playmakers in midfield all looking to play risky passes into space, both wingbacks looking to dribble frequently, they can easily mispass or get tackled
  18. How about a BBM instead of the CM(A)? The CM(A) will be up with the striker during an attack
  19. Basically, roles that look to dribble more and take risky passes are more likely to turnover possession, so you have to try & strike a balance across the team. You want players offering an offensive threat and breaking lines but not too many of them
×
×
  • Create New...