Jump to content
Sports Interactive Community


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About diddydaddydoddy

  • Rank
    Liverpool Researcher


  • Biography
    Researcher for Liverpool FC

About Me

  • About Me
    Twitter @diddydaddydoddy

Favourite Team

  • Favourite Team

Currently Managing

  • Currently Managing
    Íþróttabandalag Akraness & Liverpool

Recent Profile Visitors

2,105 profile views
  1. [ENGLAND] (Official) Liverpool Data Issues

    Gentlemen, I will soon need to start updating research again based upon the 2nd half of the season for Liverpool. I welcome your thoughts for any changes you'd suggest. Please be respectful of the first post in this thread.
  2. [ENGLAND] (Official) Liverpool Data Issues

    @Ji-Sung Park Already discussed above
  3. [ENGLAND] (Official) Liverpool Data Issues

    @jimlad Thank you sir. To be honest weight (and lesser extent height with the youngsters) is an area I struggle to find a reliable and accurate source for. Comparatively 80kg does seem more accurate. I also think Ings is a touch heavier too, he's very muscular. So I'm certainly open to suggestions regards weight.
  4. Key word there is 'constructive'. If you're not happy with something then fair enough but I wish people would have the decency of cohesively stating what they thinks wrong, what they think it should be and back it up with stats/evidence/examples etc. That way SI have a fighting chance of responding - and if they don't then that's the time to ask why?
  5. [ENGLAND] (Official) Liverpool Data Issues

    Don't get what's strange?! His CA has been lowered because he has been constantly injured and not performed particularly well when he has played. His PA has increased because it was too low. The changes are not connected.
  6. [ENGLAND] (Official) Liverpool Data Issues

    Correct. And I agree 168 could be up for debate, but I based that upon the 2012-14 period where I thought he was exceptional and for a short time became England's chief marksman (though that might not be saying much) and the fact that Lukaku had the same PA - I believe Sturridge was at least on par at his peak.
  7. [ENGLAND] (Official) Liverpool Data Issues

    Because I viewed his PA as too low to start with!!!!!!!
  8. FM18: Liverpool FC - Pace Abuse

    Agree with all that. Big fan of Milner too
  9. FM18: Liverpool FC - Pace Abuse

    I think we've won 8 out of 11 games irl since Coutinho left
  10. Obviously you DO need to state to the Man Utd researcher your reasoning for the very fact it HASN'T changed for years!! I don't know the researcher in question, but to say a new researcher is needed based upon ONE attribute being wrong in your opinion is really disrespectful and pathetic. He will have approx c36,000 pieces of detail on Man Utd to be on top of and for whatever reason he believes 15 is ok. Maybe if you put a case forward he might just change it.
  11. There was a 90% off sale in the club shop
  12. [ENGLAND] (Official) Liverpool Data Issues

    When a player is past his peak you set the PA as to the highest his CA reached iirc. And at his peak, 2012 - 14 period, I thought he was excellent.
  13. [ENGLAND] (Official) Liverpool Data Issues

    I did ask for this to be changed. The only thing I questioned was the amount , should it be £106m or £146m. The latter would include add-ons, which in theory may not be activated.
  14. Can I suggest you post this in the right forum (https://community.sigames.com/topic/411489-england-official-manchester-united-data-issues/) to give the Man Utd Researcher an opportunity to reply. You need to point out why you think the data is wrong, what it should be and state reasons/proof as to why - presuming of course you haven't already done this over the last few years.
  15. [ENGLAND] (Official) Liverpool Data Issues

    @alinp The research for VVD would have been done by the Southampton researcher for this update. At Southampton he may well have played on the right side, however I agree for us he's played on the left hand side