Jump to content
Sports Interactive Community

RCCook

Members
  • Content Count

    133
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About RCCook

  • Rank
    Amateur

About Me

  • About Me
    Dallas, Texas, USA

Interests

  • Interests
    FM, reading, writing, TV

Favourite Team

  • Favourite Team
    Liverpool, Lyon, Betis

Currently Managing

  • Currently Managing
    Lyon

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. On the role suitability, I do look at attributes rather than the circles. Definitely agree on the CM's- I've always taken care to have good defenders in both of those roles, exactly for the reason you noted. Thanks for the suggestions- I'll give them a try!
  2. On the width/tempo/counterattacking- I had actually been using a lower tempo and shorter passing, as well as the counter, to do what you suggested about a patient possession game. Most opponents do play defensively against me, and I'd rather take the safer approach to breaking them down. My team does break well on counters, so I'm honestly not sure why I removed it. The width was an attempt to spread out the defense and give my players room to set up attacks, though it hasn't seemed to help/hurt either way. As for role suitability, my wide forwards are well-suited to the IF role. The central forwards are both better as Advanced Forwards, but do have high enough ratings in Passing and Vision to play the DLF role. My thought in using that role was to have the central striker drop deeper to create space for the IF's cutting inside. With the AMC role, I still have Fekir, who is equally good as an AM or AP. His backup is much more suited for an AP role- he's a great passer, but only has an 11 in long shots and finishing. I've made a few changes based on your suggestions (see below) but if you have any ideas on how to improve it, I'd love to hear them! Thanks!
  3. Currently playing as Lyon, and using a 4-2-3-1 system (tactic below) Offensively, I have a lot of quick, creative players, who are good passers, but poor in the air. I'm trying to employ a quick-tempo, high-creativity offense that relies on the front four for goals and assists. My CM's are there to shield the defense and aid in retaining possession. I do currently have the DLF and AM on attack, but have also tried using the right-sided IF with one of the other two on support duty. Generally, two of my front four on attack, two on support. The duties/roles of the other players have remained the same. Defensively, I like to use a high line and counter-pressing to keep the opposition from penetrating too much into my end of the pitch. I know that sometimes can result in too much compression between the lines, but I find that a lower line makes me too vulnerable to teams with good attackers. The main issues that I'm having with the tactic: - high # of blocked crosses, blocked shots, and long shots - low shots on target/conversion rate I've experimented with the passing length, tempo, and defensive line, as well as changing up the AMC role (have used both AP & AM), but the same problems continue to occur. Can anyone help me see what I'm doing wrong here? We do win more often that not, but seem to have a lot of those "25 shots, 8 on target, 10-12 long shot" games that we'll win 1-0 or 2-0, and I think my players can do better. Thanks in advance for any help!
  4. I had to muddle through the first season using Ferri or Cheikh as backups, but in season 2, I promoted Owusu from the reserves. He's been fairly solid thus far.
  5. Should be this one: https://sortitoutsi.net/downloads/view/31296/retain-player-files-for-fmt It says FMT17, but they still work for the current FMT.
  6. I have a couple files from FMT17 that add players from unplayable countries, and they still work on FMT18 and FMT19.
  7. After much tinkering, finally got a functioning 4-1-2-3. I'd noticed when looking at the team report, that we were lacking in some of the mental attributes, so thought it might be a good idea to switch team shapes from Flexible to Structured. That, plus switching the flank attackers from an IF-A and W-S to IF-S and W-A, seems to have done the trick. The team is playing much smarter football, and we've won 6 of our last 8, including a 4-2 thumping of Real Madrid in the Copa del Rey!
  8. I've had good luck with a CF-A as well. Tried using a DLF, but neither of my strikers really has the passing/vision attributes to excel in that role.
  9. Sorry, should have been more clear: changing my outside defender roles to more defensive ones seems to have resolved the issue with crosses, but I've had some issues with breaking down more defensive sides, and thought the FB role change might be contributing to that. So I was thinking that I might try a more fluid team shape to see if that would improve the attack, without sacrificing our current defensive stability. I did experiment with it last night in a match where we were drawing 0-0 to a defensive side at halftime, and wound up winning 2-0. Not sure that the change was the reason we won, but I'll play around with it some more and see what happens.
  10. May give that a go in matches against "lesser" sides- I was using a WB/S and a FB/A, but found that it left my team really open to crosses. Switched to FB/S on both sides, and it's much better defensively, but still have trouble breaking some teams down. I'm playing a front three of IF-A, CF-A, and W-S, and we create a lot of good chances, but finishing can be inconsistent.
  11. Had to make a few more tweaks after some of the original issues popped up again, but think I've finally got a working tactic: DLF-S, IF-A, W-S, AP-A, MEZ-S, and added "play slightly narrower" to fix some of our defensive/passing issues. Now regularly scoring 2-3 times a match, and six straight undefeated!
  12. Changed the CF to a DLF-A and the MEZ to a BBM, and things are working much better. I'd thought the DLF would sit too deep, but he's linking up really well with the midfield and the IF. Thanks for the tips, Cleon!
  13. My thinking was that the CF and winger would create space for the IF and MEZ to attack. I have noticed the issues with penetration- seems like the AP and MEZ will frequently pass the ball around without actually doing much. Would you suggest something like changing the CF to an attack duty, or the MEZ to something like a CM-A? I'd also considered changing the CF to a DLF or F9, though both my strikers seem to be better suited for the CF role.
  14. Having some similar issues with a slightly different set-up: CF- S IF-A on the left, W-S on the right AP-S on the left, MEZ-S on the right The IF-A seems to score a reasonable amount, but also takes a lot of long shots (as does the CF). The thinking behind this set-up was that the CF would create space for the IF, who will receive passes from the CF and AP. The winger also creates space (by stretching the defense) that the MEZ can run into. I've also tried using a MEZ-A and a BBM in that slot- none seem to perform any better or worse than the others, so I've kept the support duty thinking that it would offer a bit more defensive stability. I'm also playing as Real Betis, so it's possible I may just not have the players yet to pull off what I'm trying to do.
×
×
  • Create New...