postal postie Posted November 28, 2009 Share Posted November 28, 2009 All the other shouts you can cue up. But these two just over write the other. Is this on purpose? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesB Posted November 28, 2009 Share Posted November 28, 2009 All the other shouts you can cue up. But these two just over write the other. Is this on purpose? No you can't. 'Retain possession' and 'Get the ball forward' overwrite each other. Shouts that conflict with each other do not run at the same time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
postal postie Posted November 28, 2009 Author Share Posted November 28, 2009 Surely my examples were made for each other though? Your fullbacks genrally overlap with your wingers after all Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesB Posted November 28, 2009 Share Posted November 28, 2009 Surely my examples were made for each other though? Your fullbacks genrally overlap with your wingers after all Yeah, no idea why it is done this way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
m_fenton Posted November 28, 2009 Share Posted November 28, 2009 I imagine "exploit the flanks" encourages longer balls to your wingers and for them to run more directly, while "look for overlaps" would see the wingers hold the ball up and set someone else through on the wings. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmeee17 Posted November 28, 2009 Share Posted November 28, 2009 I'd imagine exploit flanks means relying on quick, direct plays down the flanks. On the other hand, waiting for the overlap kind of negates any advantage you might have on the flanks as opposing defenders would then have time to cover. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ainu Posted November 28, 2009 Share Posted November 28, 2009 All the other shouts you can cue up. But these two just over write the other. Is this on purpose? This is indeed on purpose and contrary to what your first sentence says, almost every shout has its opposite that negates it! Pass into space or pass into feet, play wider or narrower, get stuck in or stay on feet, hassle opponents or stand off opponents, work ball into box or shoot on sight, clear to flanks or pump into box, etc, etc, etc. It's all very obvious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vasilli07 Posted November 28, 2009 Share Posted November 28, 2009 When you use 'exploit the flanks', you will notice that your FBs are already with RFD and CB on often. That's what 'look for overlap' does but wingers will get tucked in abit more instead while for 'exploit the flanks', wingers and fullbacks both stay wide to attack the flanks with crosses. So you must choose either 1... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blaupunkt Posted November 28, 2009 Share Posted November 28, 2009 look for overlap i imagine to mean something like the following... your wingers/widemen will hold the ball up trying to draw the FB to them say if they are being man marked allowing your FB/WB's the chance to run into the space down the flanks to put crosses in, Or if you are playing with a narrow midfield with no wide players your own FB/WB will look to push on when you are attacking and attack the opposition FB or get in behind him to exploit any space in that area of the pitch. but i could be wrong Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
overdozt Posted November 28, 2009 Share Posted November 28, 2009 This is a bug obviously. Exploit the middle and look for overlap also do conflict. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aytumious Posted November 28, 2009 Share Posted November 28, 2009 The shouts that would conflict are pretty obvious if you download TT&F and read what each one actually does. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.