630195 Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 I personally think it is so. I allways played the 2d option and I tought that the 2009 version was a very good work. But this year I found it very weak. To Slow or to fast, unpolished..... What do you think? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trekman Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 I've played 3D since its introduction so couldn't possibly comment. You should try the 3D if your not happy with the 2D. If your computer couldn't play 3D previously then you should try updating your directx and your graphic card drivers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
walsh Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 seems very similar to me with some tweaks, if anything it's better imho. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt_132 Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 are you talking about new 2d or 2d classic? the classic seems pretty much the same to me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
630195 Posted October 20, 2009 Author Share Posted October 20, 2009 are you talking about new 2d or 2d classic? the classic seems pretty much the same to me I am talking about the 2d classic, the new 2d is crap, the 2d classic seems the same but it moves different, not so smooth like the 09 one, it looks like an unfinished work, i like the rebound ball, but the movement of the game it`s not so realistic, the passes (the long pass) , the dribbling, the creativity, the ball heading(jumping) it`s so unrealistic. The game doesn`t create an realistic match, the players play in a different mode. You should try the 3D if your not happy with the 2D. I did tried the 3d, just to try it, it`s ok but I`m an 2d way. I love the 2d from FM, I always did, I like to let my imagination to play with the 2d, but this year it`s worse than the 2009 edition. I started this thread because I think there are many like me who still enjoy the 2d and don`t want the 2d to go down in the detriment for 3d. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
drunkpunk Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 I actually found the Classic 2D smoother than FM09. No jerking or lagging at all. Okay so its not a long term game yet, but even during loads of games going on at the same time it is smooth. The speed of it I am struggling with a bit. The fastest setting is really fast (and how it should be) but the next to fastest seems a lot slower than FM09. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
uistbhoy Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 i think it's better Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fmobande Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 serouisly how can they possible make the 2D classic better , how can they make it more clean and smooth then it is now ? and 2D that's just poo I never go on it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PGB_SPURS_FM09 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 I don't think it is... i dont see how it could be... and considering its just a representation of the Match engine(ME) in the same way the 3D is.. Means that they play the same... Many people have said its the best ME by a mile so surely it can only be better? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bennico Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 I've only had the time to play two pre-season friendlies so far on the new demo, but personally, I feel there are some improvements to the 2D from what I've seen. For me, the game runs much smoother and more fluently, with no lags or sluggishness. I'm on a pretty low end system by today's standards, and FM09 hogged 100% of my single processor. I'm pleased to say though, that FM2010 uses less than half of my processor percentage most of the time, and therefore the responsiveness of the game is vastly improved for me. I've also noticed much better animation of curling through balls from my MCa Playmaker, which is nice to see; and if I'm not mistaken, my players' positioning seems a little more realistic too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gcormack Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 it think its harder to find the right speed on this version but that's not a problem with the 2D, that's a problem with the slider. if you put the slider up full you can click it down a couple of times and it doesnt look like the slider has moved but the game has slowed down considerably. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stampler Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 like always, when people WANT to find something negative in a new game, they WILL find something. so good for you that you found it - my advice: JUST DO NOT BUY IT Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
grade Posted October 23, 2009 Share Posted October 23, 2009 If they want to buy a game and "find something negative", then it is their choice, not yours! So lighten up! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.