Jump to content

What to do with underachivers(?)?


Recommended Posts

Say you manage a decent French side who finish 4th two years in a row. You are happy with most your players, but not your keeper who ends up with a rating of 6,68 the first season and 6,78 the next season. Your assistant manager tells you your keeper is the star player in the side and gives him 4 stars. Your team concede 45 goals in the league both seasons and your keeper has saved 72% of shoots and made one mistake that ended up in the net in the latest season.

 

What do you do? Do you keep him or buy a new keeper?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, murdering him isn't an option.....

 

Honestly, keeper stats only tell you so much.  If your defense is atrocious, no keeper in the world is going to keep shots out of the net.  Based solely on the information you've given us, it's impossible to say.

 

How does your backup keeper fare?

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Black and Yellow said:

I generally find that keepers don't average too high anyway - certainly not compared to outfield players. 

This. 

If a keeper is averaging more than 6.70 in FM16, he's doing well. I'd like to see player ratings more consistent across the board in FM17.  Keepers and centre halves struggled to get as good ratings as other positions I found in this year's game. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dagenham_Dave said:

This. 

If a keeper is averaging more than 6.70 in FM16, he's doing well. I'd like to see player ratings more consistent across the board in FM17.  Keepers and centre halves struggled to get as good ratings as other positions I found in this year's game. 

 

I think I agree with you. The goalkeeper stays.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...