TokyoBlade Posted November 1, 2013 Share Posted November 1, 2013 http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/484/9yfa.png Real Madrid's most expensive ever signing? Obviously they've never heard of Gareth Bale. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cleon Posted November 1, 2013 Share Posted November 1, 2013 Didn't Real claim they only paid £77 million (€91 million) for him? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gooner88 Posted November 1, 2013 Share Posted November 1, 2013 It's been reported in Spain that Madrid actually paid £78 mill for Bale, not sure if that's shown in his history or not. Could just be spin to keep ronaldo happy but that could be why. Edit: beat me to it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomtuck01 Posted November 1, 2013 Share Posted November 1, 2013 Fail by the OP!! Erm yeah, Real claim they paid less than the £80million they did for Ronaldo. Tottenham claim differently. Both do it to appease their fans. Now, who to believe? Hmmmmm. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TokyoBlade Posted November 1, 2013 Author Share Posted November 1, 2013 http://img545.imageshack.us/img545/4232/oylc.png Nope, it shows up as £85million. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TokyoBlade Posted November 1, 2013 Author Share Posted November 1, 2013 Fail by the OP!! Erm yeah, Real claim they paid less than the £80million they did for Ronaldo. Tottenham claim differently. Both do it to appease their fans. Now, who to believe? Hmmmmm. Regardless of which is the real price paid, in the game it says £85million, so the game has its facts wrong by saying Ronaldo is the most expensive Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booooooom Posted November 1, 2013 Share Posted November 1, 2013 Bale is listed at £85m on mine... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomtuck01 Posted November 1, 2013 Share Posted November 1, 2013 Regardless of which is the real price paid, in the game it says £85million, so the game has its facts wrong by saying Ronaldo is the most expensive So how is that a problem with Worldsoccer.com? Surely it's a game issue? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PinkYoshi Posted November 1, 2013 Share Posted November 1, 2013 bale was 3 mil short of ronaldo MADRID (AFP) – Real Madrid’s president on Tuesday revealed that Gareth Bale had cost 91 million euros, confirming the Welsh winger had been insured for the value of his transfer fee. Questioned on the Intereconomia television channel on whether Real’s injured star is insured for 91 million euros ($123 million, 78 million pounds) in the event that he is forced to end his career, club president Florentino Perez replied: “Yes, sure”. - See more at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2013/10/bale-transfer-cost-91-million-euros-real-madrid-chief/#sthash.OHIcrp2P.dpuf The figure means that Real Madrid's Portuguese striker Cristiano Ronaldo remains the world's most expensive player, costing 94 million euros (80 million pounds) when he moved from Manchester United in 2009. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TokyoBlade Posted November 1, 2013 Author Share Posted November 1, 2013 So how is that a problem with Worldsoccer.com? Surely it's a game issue? I meant the worldsoccer.com in the game, not real life. Worldsoccer.com were the guys who said that in my first post. Look at the pic bale was 3 mil short of ronaldoMADRID (AFP) – Real Madrid’s president on Tuesday revealed that Gareth Bale had cost 91 million euros, confirming the Welsh winger had been insured for the value of his transfer fee. Questioned on the Intereconomia television channel on whether Real’s injured star is insured for 91 million euros ($123 million, 78 million pounds) in the event that he is forced to end his career, club president Florentino Perez replied: “Yes, sure”. - See more at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2013/10/b....OHIcrp2P.dpuf The figure means that Real Madrid's Portuguese striker Cristiano Ronaldo remains the world's most expensive player, costing 94 million euros (80 million pounds) when he moved from Manchester United in 2009. Again, I'm talking about in-game, not real life. In the game Ronaldo's fee is listed as £80million while Bale's is £85million. Therefore, in this game world, Bale is the most expensive player, not Ronaldo. How much Bale sold for in real life has nothing to do with the issue at hand. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welshace Posted November 1, 2013 Share Posted November 1, 2013 At some point Tokyo, people will get it i'm sure... The issue is with the game... not even the figure, but the game having Ronaldo set as the record holder.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TokyoBlade Posted November 1, 2013 Author Share Posted November 1, 2013 At some point Tokyo, people will get it i'm sure...The issue is with the game... not even the figure, but the game having Ronaldo set as the record holder.. Glad to see someone knows what I'm talking about Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMdan44 Posted November 1, 2013 Share Posted November 1, 2013 Just look under Madrid's records, he may still be listed there as the most expensive, sometimes that happens where the database guys forget to make the change. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterOfSuspense Posted November 1, 2013 Share Posted November 1, 2013 Ronaldo>>>>>>Bale IRL Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.