Richey Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 Man Utd are often considered to be a London club, seeing as that's where their fans live. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JGM Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 Man Utd are often considered to be a London club, seeing as that's where their fans live. that is beyond pathetic, why dont you try doing some research before you post? in devon and cornwall we have millions of them, in fact plymouth are in administration due to people glory supporting. Ignorant. *tongue firmly in cheek* Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lordgunner Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 they re nickname tiny totts so yes tottenham is a small team ...or you could try barnet another north london club in L2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
crouchaldinho Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 Man Utd are often considered to be a London club, seeing as that's where their fans live. that is beyond pathetic, why dont you try doing some research before you post?in devon and cornwall we have millions of them, in fact plymouth are in administration due to people glory supporting. Ignorant. *tongue firmly in cheek* Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackripper Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 Chelsea are a small club from London!! seconded lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidbowie Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 The Staines Town Massive yo. They are close to London right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCIAG Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 Harrow Hill. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dafuge Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 My advice is don't go too small, unless you are using some kind of data add-on. While any English club has the potential to be taken to the very top, not all of them will have accurate locations. I found this out last year as I took Tooting & Mitcham up but still had players mentioning moving away to a more metropolitan area, like Birmingham or Manchester. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
crouchaldinho Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 My advice is don't go too small, unless you are using some kind of data add-on. While any English club has the potential to be taken to the very top, not all of them will have accurate locations.I found this out last year as I took Tooting & Mitcham up but still had players mentioning moving away to a more metropolitan area, like Birmingham or Manchester. Along the same lines as this subject, I recently found out that St. Albans is only rated at a 6 for attraction in the database! I found this especially shocking when I saw that even Hemel Hempstead is rated higher (12) and Luton, of all places, is also rated as a 6! Seriously, Hemel needs some points taken off! Surely St. Albans is one of the potentially nicest places to live for a footballer (and definitely the surrounding towns and villages) when measured in terms of house prices, transport links, school performances, historical values, location in relation to the capital and quality of life etc. Personally, I would think that if Bath is 15 in terms of attraction (according to the database it is), St. Albans ought to be at least around the same level, maybe a 13 or 14. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.