karl b Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 just played a match, lost 2-1 after leading 1-0 at half time....i had the upper hand so kept going with what i was doing, end of the game opposition stats where Shots on goal 19 on target 13 clear cut chances 8 i was playing swansea not man utd....:confused: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomer Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 Known issue, is being worked on for 10.3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neji Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 I'm not sure what is meant to be wrong? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmeee17 Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 I'm not sure what is meant to be wrong? Too many clear cut chances being created maybe? Known issue in 10.2. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barkermush Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 There is a known issue, where strikers are kicking it straight at the keeper when one on one, no matter how good there finishing/composure is.. I have just learnt to ignore the 'clear cut stat' Yes clear cut, means it is a clear cut chance where you should score,and in real life you would expect a team to score at least 1 out of 3 clear cut chances. But on FM you could have 12 clear cut chances and only score 1 goal. So i have just learned to ignore this stat untill its fixed on 10.3. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomer Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 Wait, he's not complaining about that. It's another 'omg comeback' thread! It is probably your tactics. They went more attacking in the second half and you had no reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neji Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 Too many clear cut chances being created maybe? Ahh, I'm not sure if the complaint is too many CCC's being created or is that they played so well in the 2nd compared to the first? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmeee17 Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 Ahh, I'm not sure if the complaint is too many CCC's being created or is that they played so well in the 2nd compared to the first? Not sure tbh, it could be both. But judging from his thread title I prefer to give him the benefit of the doubt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
karl b Posted January 12, 2010 Author Share Posted January 12, 2010 1) they played with 1 up front so shouldnt be creating that many chances 2) every 5mins on the commentry it said, 'swansea go to a more attacking style' how mnay styles are there??? it just p*ssed me off that in 1 half of football there manager game team talk of the decade and they came at me like real madrid Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmeee17 Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 1) they played with 1 up front so shouldnt be creating that many chances2) every 5mins on the commentry it said, 'swansea go to a more attacking style' how mnay styles are there??? it just p*ssed me off that in 1 half of football there manager game team talk of the decade and they came at me like real madrid Are you playing on key highlights? You could have missed the part when they switched to a more defensive style when under pressure from you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neji Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 One up front doesn't = less chances. Did you change anything in the second half? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
karl b Posted January 12, 2010 Author Share Posted January 12, 2010 surely that is a key highlight? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
karl b Posted January 12, 2010 Author Share Posted January 12, 2010 according to my assistant he had nothing to add, i left things as they where as i was well on top, if i change something usually the same thing happens and i regret changing things Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmeee17 Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 surely that is a key highlight? Well if they had a key highlight every time a tactical change is made there'd be far too many. You'd be better off with extended/full match if you want that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
karl b Posted January 12, 2010 Author Share Posted January 12, 2010 thanks for the tip.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmeee17 Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 according to my assistant he had nothing to add, i left things as they where as i was well on top, if i change something usually the same thing happens and i regret changing things You don't always have to do exactly what the assistant manager says. Judging from the number of CCCs they created, they must have been pounding your goal in the second half. Surely that warrants a change? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
karl b Posted January 12, 2010 Author Share Posted January 12, 2010 if i change to defensive, they score, if i keep attacking then they score..this is what happens, when i'm away and take an early 1-0 ideally i'd shut up shot and try and hold my lead but as i said, no matter what i do change or no change most teas turn into real madrid second half Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grimoz Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 thing that annoys me is the amount of times you hit the post, I played a match last night and I counted 8 shots that hit the post, that needs to be fixed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmeee17 Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 if i change to defensive, they score, if i keep attacking then they score..this is what happens, when i'm away and take an early 1-0 ideally i'd shut up shot and try and hold my lead but as i said, no matter what i do change or no change most teas turn into real madrid second half If you reckon you are the better team you might want to change to a more cautious approach rather than simply shutting up shop, as doing so will simply invite pressure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coop Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Too many clear cut chances being created maybe?Known issue in 10.2. It is frustrating and I'm glad to see they are working on it. The latest example for me is a 2-0 loss at home to Sporting Lisbon. I failed to hit the target despite 10 shots on target but more importantly 6 CCC's. They hit the target twice and scored twice. They only had 1 CCC the whole game. There have been many more examples. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
karl b Posted January 14, 2010 Author Share Posted January 14, 2010 am i the only one who doesnt want to change their tactics everygame to suit the opposition? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomer Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 am i the only one who doesnt want to change their tactics everygame to suit the opposition? I never do, I just change the mentality of my team to suit the opponent. Strong oppontent = control, weak(er) = attack (or overload) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barkermush Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 am i the only one who doesnt want to change their tactics everygame to suit the opposition? Nope your not, i don't like it either, i always spend ages making a new tactic at the start of the season and stick with it. I have a tactic that i've created now, that i'm happy with. I'm dominating games and getting like 5 to 8 clear cut chances compared to the AI's 1-3 clear cut chances, but still find myself loosing 2-1 ..etc. But im not going to change my tactic again, i spent ages creating this one to dominate possesion and pass and play how i like. Plus it can't be my tactics, cause we often play good and dominate games, its just that the AI can score goals out of nothing, where as my players ALWAYS need 5 clear daylight opportunities just to score 1. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
karl b Posted January 15, 2010 Author Share Posted January 15, 2010 it seems like i'm always being pushed to be the one that changes and the game never seems to make a negative change that causes there team to fall apart..if i can make mistakes tactically during a game, surely i can expect the same from the AI? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.