glenn28 Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 It stupid that SI releses 3 patchs a year for each version of FM a game cricket coach already released 12 patchs in 6 months i love the game but more should be done to fix the bugs should release it when needed not 3 patchs a year.Thats my view. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rinso Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 Regardless of how much testing goes on, there will still be bugs and problems with the new release, its a fact of life. At least SI DO release patches, they don't have to. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welshace Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 "QUALITY NOT QUANTITY" the reason the cricket game has so many patches is that its a lesser game with a much less quality to it ... they didnt put anywhere near the effort SI put into its bug reporting and patching... just look how much SI take our views every season and implement the changes we ask for ... I dont know of any other developer or company in general with a better attitude to their customers tbh.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
glenn28 Posted December 30, 2009 Author Share Posted December 30, 2009 Each game isnt gonna 100% perfect they should release more then 3 thats what im saying.Thats life you get bugs with every release. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
glenn28 Posted December 30, 2009 Author Share Posted December 30, 2009 "QUALITY NOT QUANTITY"the reason the cricket game has so many patches is that its a lesser game with a much less quality to it ... they didnt put anywhere near the effort SI put into its bug reporting and patching... just look how much SI take our views every season and implement the changes we ask for ... I dont know of any other developer or company in general with a better attitude to their customers tbh.. Thats crap its not a lesser game & they listen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vic Taylor Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 Thats crap its not a lesser game & they listen. Maybe he meant less popular? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
B. Stinson Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 Twelve patches in six months? Geez... did they even release a game, or did they just hand out some random source code, then patch it to completion... one line of code at a time? I think it's good SI isn't this bad. If they only need a few patches, so be it. Ideally you want zero patches, but that's a bit unrealistic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
glenn28 Posted December 30, 2009 Author Share Posted December 30, 2009 Twelve patches in six months?Geez... did they even release a game, or did they just hand out some random source code, then patch it to completion... one line of code at a time? I think it's good SI isn't this bad. If they only need a few patches, so be it. Ideally you want zero patches, but that's a bit unrealistic. Zero would be better unfortuney you get bugs with every game you get. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cf Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 Twelve patches in six months?Geez... did they even release a game, or did they just hand out some random source code, then patch it to completion... one line of code at a time? I think it's good SI isn't this bad. If they only need a few patches, so be it. Ideally you want zero patches, but that's a bit unrealistic. Fewer patches cannot necessarily be intrepreted as being better. It could equally be viewed as having to wait longer for fixes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vic Taylor Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 Fewer patches cannot necessarily be intrepreted as being better. It could equally be viewed as having to wait longer for fixes. It could also be viewed as having more bugs to fix. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cf Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 Of course, it could even mean the bugs are more serious; that patches introduced further bugs; there are a number of possibilities. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
B. Stinson Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 or that more effort is being put into them... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.