hogiemeister Posted September 12, 2009 Share Posted September 12, 2009 Just wondering which attribute represents the decrease in condition during a match better? Would it depend more on a player's natural fitness or his stamina? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hilton210916 Posted September 12, 2009 Share Posted September 12, 2009 I would say stamina. Natural fitness represents the likeliness of the player picking up an injury. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killer Kaa Posted September 12, 2009 Share Posted September 12, 2009 I think natural fitness is how well a player lasts from game to game and stamina how long they last in a game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bardock Posted September 12, 2009 Share Posted September 12, 2009 I would say stamina. Natural fitness represents the likeliness of the player picking up an injury. Correct. Natural fitness also represents the speed of recovery after completing a football match. Players with high natural fitness will reach 100% condition faster than those with low natural fitness. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabio MVP Posted September 12, 2009 Share Posted September 12, 2009 Correct. Natural fitness also represents the speed of recovery after completing a football match. Players with high natural fitness will reach 100% condition faster than those with low natural fitness. Spot on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AB-forever Posted September 12, 2009 Share Posted September 12, 2009 Natural fitness represents the likeliness of the player picking up an injury. No that would be the hidden attribute Injury Proneness Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ackter Posted September 12, 2009 Share Posted September 12, 2009 No that would be the hidden attribute Injury Proneness Correct. Though everything else bardock said is correct. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bardock Posted September 12, 2009 Share Posted September 12, 2009 Correct.Though everything else bardock said is correct. You're joking right? I based my transfer activity for the pass god knows how many years on this. I never knew there was an injury proneness attribute. I learn something new everyday on this forum. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AB-forever Posted September 12, 2009 Share Posted September 12, 2009 Natural Fitness is still quite handy though. Players with high Natural Fitness have to train less to get match fit after an injury. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ackter Posted September 13, 2009 Share Posted September 13, 2009 They're also far more likely to be able to play at their best well into their 30s. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
phnompenhandy Posted September 13, 2009 Share Posted September 13, 2009 Correct.Though everything else bardock said is correct. Well it is far more complex than that. SFraser has done an excellent analysis on injuries in a thread in the Tactics/Training forum. He notes that injuries are also affected by other attributes as well as the playing style. For example a pacey winger with poor agility is likely to pick up more injuries because he can't avoid tackles. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.