knap

@davecrossley There is a list of tweaks with docs post to change to control or SUS. Control just changes to regroup and hold shape.. More tedious to set up is man marking the AI s wing players, I sometimes use position marking in tactics but this , for some reason, is not as effective as marking a named player.

@xavinwonderland At Baden Powell , can't provide a direct link on forum. there is a weighted attribute system linked to CA.

VNS and VNN to PL FM21WARRIORKnap4442P236DHBOSTONPL.fmf

@trupek2009 Nothing between them on HUB Test, but does give a variation if it helps to outfox AI

@Xilencer1988 Probably a 442 or 4132, although 41320 PILGRIMAGE would probably give best results

ME 21.7 ARGUS 352 VOL 2 MU P102 CC P229 ME21.7ARGUSknapVOL23523MUP102CCP229.fmf

ME 21.7 ARGUS 343 MU P99 CC P235 ME21.7ARGUSknap343MUP99CCP235.fmf

@KakaSCP Not sure a wide diamond would work that well. Maybe 4132

For those that cannot download tacics instructions for WOF 4231 P109 ALL CUPS

@Emrekellegoz Depends if it relates to training schedules

ME 21.7 WHEELS OF FIRE 4231 P109 ALL CUPS FM21.7WHEELSOFFIREVOL2Knap4231PP109ALLCUPS.fmf Also tested with Hamlet from VNS to PL

@krript I don't believe they have the abilty to solve anybodies tactics. I don't think they have the intelligence, if they did they would crack them after a few games.

@krriptI don't believe the AI can solve tactics, and therefore there must be another explanation. Any which are top of the tests. The LL tests show how adaptable a tactic is with various squad abilities. HUB various team strengths and long elimates RNG as much as possible.

@krriptI don't believe the AI can solve tactics, and therefore there must be another explanation. Any which are top of the tests. The LL tests show how adaptable a tactic is with various squad abilities. HUB various team strengths and long elimates RNG as much as possible.

@RyanJ98 Probably a strikerless and maybe the one I made last year or Venom 442 that I set up in the Beta.