Jump to content

Jeroen Thijssen

SI Staff
  • Posts

    70,976
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jeroen Thijssen

  1. Again, just like Grim - this is a licensing request we require to follow. - Unless if it's pure nonsense - we did have a social media manager requested to be added with other clubs - and also a Club Mascot. But yeah, that was a little out there
  2. Appreciate the input! We will keep on re-evaluating him as the season progresses. Thanks.
  3. Thanks for reporting. We will look into it - and see if we can add Aziz Bouras to the Algeria NT for future updates.
  4. Is not allowed to add him, unfortunately.
  5. I think I've caught up with everybody for data/research issues (everything) - thanks for the input - it's much appreciated
  6. Hey Hanz, thanks for the feedback 1) Thanks, will amend this. 2) We have Sharjah set as affiliated club 3) Thanks, I suppose we should retire him! 4) Adjusting for future releases 5) Hmm - he is originally a right back, since we have him as DRC - that's not wrong - I think that gets overlooked a little bit. We'll adjust his positional ratings. 6) Thanks! We did have the option there, but not the right amount 7) Not sure if Urawa agreement is still there.... 8) Well, Ramaj sucks, Kaplan has been injured forever and ASE is playing for both sides - so not sure. Vos has had a quite a big improvement and is a very talented player. Also not convinced if Vos is a mainstay, realistically he would have been behind Mannsverk and Tahirovic in the pecking order for sure. But I do agree Ramaj and Vos should probably be there - it's not something easily to portray though, as it's AI that mostly decides. We'll have to monitor this. 9) Agreed, we will look to adjust 10) Will look into it 11) Tough one. Have a feeling he could wind up at RKC somehow - but it's difficult to deal with this situation 12) They were still set to youth contracts unfortunately - although we did renew the contracts. 13) Thanks, logged before - missed this one unfortunately 14) Hmm, that's strange - Mokono is nowhere near Almere in the database? 15) Which one is really the better GK though. Mulder definitely historically. Made some changes, because Mulder was a lot better a few months ago (in our database) - now they're pretty much equal. Mulder dropped, De Lange raised. They're pretty much equal
  7. Hi there, this could be due to lack of information - or plenty of other reasons. I will contact you, thanks for raising this!
  8. Luukinho (and others) have been set like this as per request of licensing. I think Veerman is quite aggressive (and annoying, haha) - definitely makes some frustration fouls for example. We will keep on evaluating players as the season(s) progress though.
  9. That is possible. https://www.ajaxshowtime.com/bijzaken-en-geruchten/knvb-neemt-besluit-contracten-vanaf-15-jaar There might be a newer (more official) article somewhere, but this covers it.
  10. Thanks, we will look to fix those when possible. Clearly - will include these, it's nice to have Thanks, we will look to adjust these - makes sense to lower the "friendly percentage" - and will increase the likelihood with Patro. Indeed. This has been logged - looks like there's several other examples like this as well. We will need a bit more information - preferably with a date of birth as well We don't set these values - that doesn't sound right indeed - but this is not upto me (research/database)
  11. Thanks for your work in (and beyond) this thread to both @Fire_03 and @Dominic10 Much appreciated
  12. We'll look into this for future versions/releases. Thanks.
  13. Is this right or wrong? But this should be possible.
  14. Hey! Well, Grim is a licensing request - but at least he has been set there. I agree about Bakker - he has a randomly generated determination rating, so can sometimes unfortunately be 3. He's been doing allright, I agree. But he's not a bad goalie (for you overall, ignoring the determination) Stan ter Haar is no longer with Almere -> https://www.excelsior31.nl/9341/nieuws/stan-ter-haar-20-terug-bij-excelsior-31 We haven't included most U18 players if a clear date of birth is missing. We will look into the non-playing staff for future releases Unfortunately we missed Mamengi. I'm not sure how - but he will be addressed for future releases of course.
  15. Which conditions though? I think everybody wants for Maxi to join Racing Club - but we will have to see how it goes - I think this will be answered in January. There is a partnership set up with CD Guadalajara (which should be the same team) Saibari has 100% been set correctly already. Ledezma not so much, we'll look to update this for future versions. Which awards are you looking at exactly? I think they were just recently handed out - during the season, so we didn't add them (yet) - although you could argue as they're for the past season.... but just to double check which ones you're missing.
  16. Duplicate issue. You are correct though, this appears to be happening more often. (Closed the other one) Thanks for flagging.
  17. They have indeed. Thanks for flagging this, we will look to get this corrected for future updates.
  18. There are indeed two Arend-Jan van de Weteringen at FC Groningen. That's correct, didn't you know? Yeah no, sadly he's been created twice We'll look to delete one of the entries for future release. Well spotted.
  19. Hi, thanks for logging this - we will check this and adjust for future release
  20. Not official - there's different sources claiming different things. This has been checked and we will monitor - but right now we just have to go with the option. Note: We've checked this here as well ->
  21. Boniface has been rated by the Belgian research team - and generally we don't really like to make big changes to players until after they are settled / it's clear which kind of impact they have etc. We kind of overstepped our boundaries already and did improve him - but yes, currently - also based on previous experience - we have Schick rated higher than Boniface - which is something that we'll need to monitor as the season progresses
  22. Stuttgart are overperforming. It's also not realistic to give them the 2nd best squad just because they are in fact currently 2nd. They were expected to battle against relegation before the season, maybe midtable - and after some recent improvments that's where they ought to end up (in game)
  23. It's set at 55.500 in lieu with licensing requests
  24. This has happened in between data lock for the public release and real time. Will be fixed in future versions.
×
×
  • Create New...