Jump to content

Karlo

Members+
  • Posts

    212
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

54 "Houston, we have a problem"

1 Follower

About Me

  • About Me
    Dokkum

Recent Profile Visitors

1,826 profile views
  1. Not sure if it's typical Simeone but you may be missing some penetration from midfield to support your F9. Do you want both wingbacks on attack? I think support is fine, also for your DLP. Then you get something like this: AFat F9su MEZsu CMat (C)WBsu DLPsu (C)WBsu WCBde CDde WCBde SKde
  2. Hi @knap could you update this to latest ME, up to positive mentality and keep the player roles?
  3. This is your 100th topic where you claim that your tactics have stopped working, when are you going to follow the well-intentioned advice given in your 100 previous topics?
  4. for example SK WB BPD BPD WB BWM DLP IW AM IF CF/AF SK WB BPD BPD WB DLP CM/MEZ BBM W IF CF/AF
  5. Looks pretty balanced. Only changes I would make is IWBat > WBat and maybe up the mentality to positive.
  6. Thank you. That's the thing, I won't mind if it's not working as good. Just a little bored of double FBat, DMsu and IF - AM - IF
  7. Hello Knap, All 4231dm tactics look very similar in terms of roles. Would you like to make some more variations? It doesn't matter to me if the tactics generally perform less well. Think of: BWM - DLP IW - AM - IF or VOL - RPM W - AM - IF etc.
  8. IFBde - Lsu - BPDde - IFBde It's a bit like how City defends with Stones. With the new rotations you get the field occupancy you want. Only the rest of the attacking roles will be a matter of experimenting and seeing what suits the players
  9. To create this formation, I think you will first have to start with a back four. I think the right and left back should be IFBde and the DM a Libero on support.
×
×
  • Create New...