I would call it low risk, possession based football. Would I call it attacking football? Not really. I don’t think there are many cases of low risk attacking football, it’s a bit of an oxymoron imo. I mean, in theory, yes but it doesn’t really play out that way. City always play a high line, they’re always attacking and, whilst they have more possession than say Liverpool, it’s not low risk. It’s just how they play. Strangling the game so that the opposition cannot get a foothold.
Pep would never say he plays ‘low risk’ football.
FM has too many variations, complexity and systems that can too easily cancel each other out. An overhaul is required to present this information in a more readable format to the player and tactical instructions, mentality, player roles all could do with some streamlining. It’s system upon system that’s been added together over years and it’s resulted in this complex soup that over complicates everything imo.