iamjerome Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 I remember reading somewhere from a SI/Sega person (i suspect it was that 'matt' fellow but i haven't been able to find the post again to confirm) to counter a claim by someone that teams only scoring 1 goal every 3-4 CCC is 'correct', using C Ronaldo's stats last year of having scored 40 goals but taken 160~ shots. however, to make a further enquiry on this i have a few questions. 1/ what determines what is scored exactly? surely it should be purely the match engine not predetermined statistics like that. i can almost understand there being some sort of 'limiter' but even then, that should only be temporary until the match engine is good enough to not need such a thing 2/ CCC!=SOG. i have no doubt that scoring every 3-4, perhaps upto 5 shots on goal could very well be right, but that is of course not taking into the context of the chance situation. in terms of CCC, there's absolutely no way that the ratio is as sparse, at most 1 every 2.5, not worse. with the ronaldo stat earlier you had to accept that he used to shoot like lampard used to, any chance he got basically hardly a good basis for converting them but of course man utd created enough chances for that to not matter. 3/ purely anecdotal but is it just me or is it 'easier' to score for people with good jumping than foot-finishing? just seems that way, because i play with 'play to feet' sort of football / forwards, yet even then wingers of course put crosses in once a while and the ratio of headers on goal:goals seems higher than CCC:goal. this could be total ******** of course, but lisandro lopez isn't quite alan shearer when it comes to his head. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Future\'s_Maroon Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 No offence mate, but could you try to translate that into English! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cityull Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 I understood it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamjerome Posted December 30, 2008 Author Share Posted December 30, 2008 No offence mate' date=' but could you try to translate that into English![/quote']what don't you understand? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mavericktangoII Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 CCC??? coca cola carrotts? Crystal clear clot? corners carried crazily? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamjerome Posted December 30, 2008 Author Share Posted December 30, 2008 clear cut chances........ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suzie MUFC Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 clear cut chances........ I wondered what it meant. All of a sudden people have started saying it like it's the new "in" thing, when I've been playing CM/FM for years and never seen it once. The only CCC I knew of before now was the ATI Catalyst Control Centre... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aytumious Posted December 31, 2008 Share Posted December 31, 2008 I wondered what it meant. All of a sudden people have started saying it like it's the new "in" thing, when I've been playing CM/FM for years and never seen it once.The only CCC I knew of before now was the ATI Catalyst Control Centre... The stat in game is labeled CCC so that is why you are seeing it now. I think this is the first year it has been kept (I could be wrong about that). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
T4RG4 Posted December 31, 2008 Share Posted December 31, 2008 I'm a firm believer in balancing game stats, not only to reflect info gained from reality, but to an extent so as to appear realistic. For example - I'd have no problem with more CCC's being tucked away if the large majority of people felt it more realistic. I'm not talking a 50% swing, a small percentage but a change nonetheless. Anyhooo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamjerome Posted December 31, 2008 Author Share Posted December 31, 2008 I'm a firm believer in balancing game stats, not only to reflect info gained from reality, but to an extent so as to appear realistic. For example - I'd have no problem with more CCC's being tucked away if the large majority of people felt it more realistic. I'm not talking a 50% swing, a small percentage but a change nonetheless. Anyhooo.yes the game stats should be balanced but because of a realistic game engine not because of predetermined limitations? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamjerome Posted January 1, 2009 Author Share Posted January 1, 2009 can i have a reply to my queries please at all? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.