speople Posted March 15, 2010 Share Posted March 15, 2010 Feel free to think of it as another speopleism. But even in my early days of playing CM4, it seemed apparent that my players who weren't 'indispensible to the club' would make more mistakes/play worse than those players who were indispensible. Given that on that version, you could swap your players status around willy nilly without any consequence, but that on FM2010 a player will get unhappy if you lower his status, does playing worse/better according to squad status therefore have any basis in facts ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neji Posted March 15, 2010 Share Posted March 15, 2010 Wouldn't that be the reason they aren't indispensable? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCIAG Posted March 15, 2010 Share Posted March 15, 2010 Not directly, no, but you'd logically give your best players the highest squad status. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
baker.simon Posted March 15, 2010 Share Posted March 15, 2010 I'd be more inclined to make my star striker a key player over a youth prospect from wherever. As the star striker is good enough for my team then i guess he deserves the higher status. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlo116 Posted March 15, 2010 Share Posted March 15, 2010 They're not going to play worse if you downgrade their squad status its simply that the best players are the ones who are indispensible to the club because they are better than most of the other players in the team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCIAG Posted March 15, 2010 Share Posted March 15, 2010 They may get upset, which would affect performances for a short while, but they'd get over it and play to their attributes again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.