Jump to content

corrynation

Members+
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by corrynation

  1. Not only is that patently untrue, honestly it's not remotely accurate. But additionally, we've been told so many times to report examples and demonstrate the problem. This is devoid of purpose.
  2. Umm... Am I missing something big here or are you? That says MINIMUM potential ability. You directly said max PA. So what the search says is min current ability of 110 in your example with at least 130 pa but no ceiling on it.
  3. I honestly don't know if anyone has had a rationale interaction with a player consistently putting in bad performances. I have Pedro Porro, one of my star players, who has been putting in 6.3's and below all season with exactly 2 games of 7.1 My board and fans are very displeased and I've had numerous talks with him about form which he's handled very poorly. Finally had the discussion about putting some benchmarks at week 31 of the year of this (Since SI inexplicably removed the discipline feature) He blew up and demanded to be loaned out. I moved him to the under 18's, he blew up again saying he's been playing fine. Not only has this happened with any player, in any save I've had of the situation, it's detached from reality AND if it's never going to work, why are you adding options like this SI? Maybe others can refute this with their experience. Either way I'm going to need to add some saves, no doubt of which you're going to need before the incident (a requirement that makes no rationale sense for us as players to be able to have) And given the flood of honest to god bugs in player interactions we've been seeing... massively disappointed.
  4. A number of occasions have arisen where a player will be transfer listed, with no other interest, but when I offer the amount requested, they raise it substantially! As shown here Madrid was asking 6.2 for Lemar, when I offered it, they tried to raise it to 14 and only negotiated down to 11.25
  5. I had to switch back to Rambo.... Raya was doing... poorly and got injured. He'd averaged conceding 1 of every 3 shots on target for 12 games. Then I broke Rambo back. Playing cautious, best defense in the league, 64% possession. I conceded all FOUR shots on target, 3 in the last 10 minutes. total xg of the game was 1. Lloris stopped 3 of 5. 6 goals of 9 shots, total combined xG of 2.27. This. Is. Common. Possession strategy doesn't work, defensive mindedness doesn't work, and goalkeepers, don't work. My best clean sheets and possession have come from playing attacking aggressiveness. Tottenham v Arsenal.pkm
  6. This is a FREQUENT and very big problem, but to just solidify it, Ramsdale went 4 games in a row (pkms posted below) conceding SIX while saving 1 shot from all those games. I don't know how many times I have to repeat this but please don't bother claiming it's tactics. .xG is the calculation of the quality of the chances, and only shots on target factor when it comes to keeper performance. Blaming aggressive tactics, then I only concede one shot on goal with an xG of .14, the expectation is on the keeper to do his job, obviously conceding that one chance will happen, but repeatedly then begs "what is he there for?" Also for what it's worth, playing cautious and balanced frequently concedes ALL the possession and so many more shots against anyways in what I can only conclude is another flaw.
  7. I mean, this one is pretty accurate. You conceded truly massive chances of huge quality. Your .xG is almost equal but that's from 10 shots. This one is roughly fair.
  8. Honestly though, have you read any of the responses??? Like, genuinely, long responses. pkms also extensively. Nevermind they are irrelevant to the issue.
  9. I found another one from before. Arsenal vs Panathinakos in a friendly. I crushed them 8-2, but they had exactly 2 shots, on target or otherwise, combined .66 xG (the first one was a good chance) but Balanced, mid block, defensive roles, and on the whole very cautious vs such a weak opponent. The second shot had .04 chance from outside the box. Over, and over, watching first shot on target being scored, often every shot on target scores. Last year Rambo ranked dead last in saves parried, and did not rank at ALL in saves held as... yes indeed, Rambo held fewer saves than the BACKUP keepers over the course of the year despite not missing a game last year. Most games played at Balanced, the only way I managed any success was purely stopping any shots at all wherever I could. If the only solution is playing like you have no confidence in your keeper... there's no fun in the game. Stats wise also... there's only 4-6 keepers in the world that I've found with better stats of one-one and reflexes than Rambo so upgrades aren't much of an option at 200+ mil. I've tried with Raya and a couple others either. It's offensive Panathinaikos v Arsenal.pkm
  10. But if you want to insist... Go ahead and critique my tactics, balanced, defensive and possession oriented, conceded my first 4 shots on target with an xG of like.... .9 in total with a full strength squad. And hardly a rare occurance Leeds v Arsenal.pkm
  11. The belligerent denial to see the problem here is amazing. But we can't keep repeating this but SI has denied there being a problem and flatly refused to look more. It is NOT about the frequency of concession of goals. It's the easy sloppy goals being conceded. If the keeper can't bother to save the easiest of chances, why have one between the sticks? The xG and shots data is plenty to see the problem and tactics has nothing to do with the keeper's job. Your harassment and dismissal does nothing for it either. He did post pkms with no acknowledgement from SI and gave up on that. He posted more information with the outcries of "tactics" being the issue despite the fact that he's not claiming he shouldn't concede any, just conceding from SO few chances and such low quality ones. Even if he wasn't, the matter is a real one and has been ignored entirely by SI. Why is everyone compelled to not think about the issue and be so belligerent? It is a real issue
  12. I've also been having this issue regularly since FM23. Truthfully not always even just when swapping positions around. It can drive me crazy also as it won't immediately reflect in the squad lineup on the bottom, I have to see their name on the pitch or open tactics.
  13. I don't want to come off mean here but, while yes, this is a wildly aggressive tactic, that actually has NOTHING to do with the posted problem. If he's higher quality than the opposition and can maintain a hard press on the other team and wants to play wild, go for it. Not all his screenshots are demonstrating the problem but a whole lot are. The problem we're all livid about is what the KEEPER is doing. If the keeper is seeing 7 shots, 4 of them on target with a combined xG of .57 and concedes 3??? That's abysmal. Claudio Bravo for Man City saved only 56% of shots on target (I don't think they were tracking xG at the time) and got bounced out within a year seen as a terrible performance. If they're not clear cut chances, with like .1 chance of scoring, you should NOT be conceding so regularly. We are sick of the gk inability to save so few easy shots, it's legitimately got nothing to do with the tactics. Don't be that guy.
  14. I've lost count of how many times results look like this. Also a goal given as an own goal incorrectly. Refund Please. I'm deleting the game after this. Leeds v Arsenal.pkm
  15. It cracks me up. Tactics pertain to the number of shots conceded and quality of them. Goalkeepers are the only the only factor when it comes to how many are conceded based on those numbers. If one shot on goal is conceded, and it has an xG of .08, tactics had nothing to do with whether it's a goal or not.
  16. To continue on with this... it is absurd. Raya and Ramsdale are essentially failing to save ANY shots. Having conceded 4 goals from 4 shots with a combined .88 xG (with a balanced defensive tactic and good control) I switch goal keepers who immediately concedes the next shot on goal. This is happening on a very regular basis. And almost always conceding first shot on target. Between the dreadful defensive glitches and these atrocious goalkeeping mistakes, idk what's the point of the game here. I know there won't be any response but frankly, SI, I want a refund. I own 8 editions and I've had this one for less than a week. I won't be buying more. Shame on you. You've promoted a number of features that not only do not work, but detract from previous versions in my opinion and your responses have been insulting to loyal players. Squad management, subs, defensive movements, goalkeeper glitches, ridiculous injury patterns, all "acceptable to you". Man UFC v Arsenal.pkm
  17. I appreciate that. And it's what I'm having to do. But I'm wondering if you actually read my post or if you just jump to informing what I did wrong? In addition to these repeat injuries happening even before I put them in any match at all, I was speaking about the aspects that it seems unusual that I have to manually tell my coaches not to go break them the day after they come back. Or have some kind of streamlined options like when they return from injury, having in the message a default ease them in option.
  18. Thank you for the quick response! I realize there's bias towards bad news on this so I'm just inquiring right now. As an aside, there's a real number of repeat injuries on the training field of someone who just got injured within say a week sometimes even next day. While I realize your internal numbers might say they're low, this particular kind of injury does not feel like it should be manually managed. If a player is back from injury and I'm nursing them in matches, how does any professional coach risk them in training? If there's a way to mitigate such quick injuries on the training field, I feel I shouldn't have to manually go in and say "hey, maybe not give him the brexit tackle treatments today in training right?" For an Premier League coach I feel this should be automatic
  19. I'm... really at a loss to this. What is YOUR impression of what an average xG per shot is supposed to be? Those look to be frankly about average for the EPL at least. What's more... the problem here is about the KEEPER. Therefore the factor at hand only matters to the quality of the shots on target! If he's facing a couple of shots on target per match, and those shots aren't of a high xG... there's a problem at hand here. This really, REALLY isn't complicated. A poor tactical plan concedes more shots, more shots on target and higher xG chances (clear cut). We're looking at those numbers without the tactics. If he was complaining about how many shots get passed his defensive line, or that they were remarkably high xG, that's a tactics issue. Looking at the numbers, he's not letting a high number of shots through to keeper and they aren't at all gilt-edged chances which means they boil down to the keeper's job. Honestly.
  20. This subject is being raised time and time again. SI, your responses have been TRAGIC. If you're reliant on us to report issues, bugs and errors, then you can NOT respond with "That's not what we're seeing, we won't change it". For the record, I'm playing balanced, with Rice as DM, my back 4 on defensive, one IWB-D and one FB-D. Playing full strength against teams a league lower and conceding first shots, .09 xg, and several times EVERY shot. AI squad management problems aside that are offensive to us how you're treating it, I'm staggeringly let down. I have 8 of the last 10 editions and thousands of hours. I should have researched more. It's my 3rd day owning it and I want a refund. If you can't give better responses and updates to your user base, go ahead and just cuss us out and be done with it. PKM's to come as you refuse to acknowledge without it but frankly, you've been provided many.
  21. I'm all of 4 matches into the season, not only have 4 of my starting 11 been injured each at least 2 weeks, but 1, zinchenko, has been injured 4 times in 5 weeks despite playing once, all training injuries. I gave the entire team 4 days off to not risk it before a big match, 1 got food poisoning the night before regardless. Another match I had 2 injured in game. I've tried reducing training, lowering intensity etc. Is this an isolated incident before I have to start saving before and after files of every single week to upload for errors?
×
×
  • Create New...