Jump to content

corrynation

Members+
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 "What we've got here is a failure to communicate"

Currently Managing

  • Currently Managing
    Arsenal

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Not only is that patently untrue, honestly it's not remotely accurate. But additionally, we've been told so many times to report examples and demonstrate the problem. This is devoid of purpose.
  2. Umm... Am I missing something big here or are you? That says MINIMUM potential ability. You directly said max PA. So what the search says is min current ability of 110 in your example with at least 130 pa but no ceiling on it.
  3. I honestly don't know if anyone has had a rationale interaction with a player consistently putting in bad performances. I have Pedro Porro, one of my star players, who has been putting in 6.3's and below all season with exactly 2 games of 7.1 My board and fans are very displeased and I've had numerous talks with him about form which he's handled very poorly. Finally had the discussion about putting some benchmarks at week 31 of the year of this (Since SI inexplicably removed the discipline feature) He blew up and demanded to be loaned out. I moved him to the under 18's, he blew up again saying he's been playing fine. Not only has this happened with any player, in any save I've had of the situation, it's detached from reality AND if it's never going to work, why are you adding options like this SI? Maybe others can refute this with their experience. Either way I'm going to need to add some saves, no doubt of which you're going to need before the incident (a requirement that makes no rationale sense for us as players to be able to have) And given the flood of honest to god bugs in player interactions we've been seeing... massively disappointed.
  4. A number of occasions have arisen where a player will be transfer listed, with no other interest, but when I offer the amount requested, they raise it substantially! As shown here Madrid was asking 6.2 for Lemar, when I offered it, they tried to raise it to 14 and only negotiated down to 11.25
  5. I had to switch back to Rambo.... Raya was doing... poorly and got injured. He'd averaged conceding 1 of every 3 shots on target for 12 games. Then I broke Rambo back. Playing cautious, best defense in the league, 64% possession. I conceded all FOUR shots on target, 3 in the last 10 minutes. total xg of the game was 1. Lloris stopped 3 of 5. 6 goals of 9 shots, total combined xG of 2.27. This. Is. Common. Possession strategy doesn't work, defensive mindedness doesn't work, and goalkeepers, don't work. My best clean sheets and possession have come from playing attacking aggressiveness. Tottenham v Arsenal.pkm
  6. This is a FREQUENT and very big problem, but to just solidify it, Ramsdale went 4 games in a row (pkms posted below) conceding SIX while saving 1 shot from all those games. I don't know how many times I have to repeat this but please don't bother claiming it's tactics. .xG is the calculation of the quality of the chances, and only shots on target factor when it comes to keeper performance. Blaming aggressive tactics, then I only concede one shot on goal with an xG of .14, the expectation is on the keeper to do his job, obviously conceding that one chance will happen, but repeatedly then begs "what is he there for?" Also for what it's worth, playing cautious and balanced frequently concedes ALL the possession and so many more shots against anyways in what I can only conclude is another flaw.
  7. I mean, this one is pretty accurate. You conceded truly massive chances of huge quality. Your .xG is almost equal but that's from 10 shots. This one is roughly fair.
  8. Honestly though, have you read any of the responses??? Like, genuinely, long responses. pkms also extensively. Nevermind they are irrelevant to the issue.
  9. I found another one from before. Arsenal vs Panathinakos in a friendly. I crushed them 8-2, but they had exactly 2 shots, on target or otherwise, combined .66 xG (the first one was a good chance) but Balanced, mid block, defensive roles, and on the whole very cautious vs such a weak opponent. The second shot had .04 chance from outside the box. Over, and over, watching first shot on target being scored, often every shot on target scores. Last year Rambo ranked dead last in saves parried, and did not rank at ALL in saves held as... yes indeed, Rambo held fewer saves than the BACKUP keepers over the course of the year despite not missing a game last year. Most games played at Balanced, the only way I managed any success was purely stopping any shots at all wherever I could. If the only solution is playing like you have no confidence in your keeper... there's no fun in the game. Stats wise also... there's only 4-6 keepers in the world that I've found with better stats of one-one and reflexes than Rambo so upgrades aren't much of an option at 200+ mil. I've tried with Raya and a couple others either. It's offensive Panathinaikos v Arsenal.pkm
  10. But if you want to insist... Go ahead and critique my tactics, balanced, defensive and possession oriented, conceded my first 4 shots on target with an xG of like.... .9 in total with a full strength squad. And hardly a rare occurance Leeds v Arsenal.pkm
  11. The belligerent denial to see the problem here is amazing. But we can't keep repeating this but SI has denied there being a problem and flatly refused to look more. It is NOT about the frequency of concession of goals. It's the easy sloppy goals being conceded. If the keeper can't bother to save the easiest of chances, why have one between the sticks? The xG and shots data is plenty to see the problem and tactics has nothing to do with the keeper's job. Your harassment and dismissal does nothing for it either. He did post pkms with no acknowledgement from SI and gave up on that. He posted more information with the outcries of "tactics" being the issue despite the fact that he's not claiming he shouldn't concede any, just conceding from SO few chances and such low quality ones. Even if he wasn't, the matter is a real one and has been ignored entirely by SI. Why is everyone compelled to not think about the issue and be so belligerent? It is a real issue
  12. I've also been having this issue regularly since FM23. Truthfully not always even just when swapping positions around. It can drive me crazy also as it won't immediately reflect in the squad lineup on the bottom, I have to see their name on the pitch or open tactics.
  13. I don't want to come off mean here but, while yes, this is a wildly aggressive tactic, that actually has NOTHING to do with the posted problem. If he's higher quality than the opposition and can maintain a hard press on the other team and wants to play wild, go for it. Not all his screenshots are demonstrating the problem but a whole lot are. The problem we're all livid about is what the KEEPER is doing. If the keeper is seeing 7 shots, 4 of them on target with a combined xG of .57 and concedes 3??? That's abysmal. Claudio Bravo for Man City saved only 56% of shots on target (I don't think they were tracking xG at the time) and got bounced out within a year seen as a terrible performance. If they're not clear cut chances, with like .1 chance of scoring, you should NOT be conceding so regularly. We are sick of the gk inability to save so few easy shots, it's legitimately got nothing to do with the tactics. Don't be that guy.
×
×
  • Create New...