Traver Posted December 18, 2008 Share Posted December 18, 2008 Can anyone explain this to me, I'm quite puzzled! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
4457 Posted December 18, 2008 Share Posted December 18, 2008 Normally when that happens either your signing hasn't played enough games or has had poor performances. I'm going to bet the former. Just four games then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cityull Posted December 18, 2008 Share Posted December 18, 2008 If a good player signs for you thats pretty much alway a good thing , right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smellfire Posted December 18, 2008 Share Posted December 18, 2008 Aye, youth players never used to get taken into account with poor performances or games played, but they do now, just ignore it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThE BoMBeR Posted December 18, 2008 Share Posted December 18, 2008 This happens alot.. I sign alot of 16 year old regens and let them play in the under 20 league... When a cup match comes along I usually give them the odd appearance.. so approx 2-3 games for first team in a season... so if they perform below average the fans become disappointed in the signings even though his price was 10k lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
damienroden Posted December 18, 2008 Share Posted December 18, 2008 For some reason the board always produce a negative, this must be the most negative thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
T4RG4 Posted December 18, 2008 Share Posted December 18, 2008 I've had the fan spokesman, maybe even the board but cannot be sure, alter their opinion based on the players transfer fee. For example something like this... '... but we understand he is making up the numbers as evidenced by the amount paid for him' Which was nice. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elgreenio Posted December 18, 2008 Share Posted December 18, 2008 is he a bit of a terror? i.e. he may cause a few problems within the squad with his personality Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blanchflower1 Posted December 18, 2008 Share Posted December 18, 2008 For some reason the board always produce a negative, this must be the most negative thing. The player in question must play a number of games for the board not to be disappointed with the signing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
damienroden Posted December 18, 2008 Share Posted December 18, 2008 right, so if he has been signed but not utilized? that is understandable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
greco Posted December 18, 2008 Share Posted December 18, 2008 come on, the board shouldnt judge players, who are bought as young teens, unless the fee is really really high.. i buy 2-4 young players a year, in the age group 15-17, they are bought for the future, not to establish themselves as starters NOW.. that should not be a problem, for the board the comprehend. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.