papagie Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 I dont know if this is a bug/known issue or if it's actual contract rules but i'm having a minimum fee for a player rejected. The player has a 3.1mil min fee release clause that I activated, unfortunately he failed his medical. So I made another approach this time stipulating that the transfer takes place at the end of the season but to my surprise it's rejected. Am I missing something? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiitastic Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 *deleted* totally uncalled for and thus you have been reported. In regards to the thread starter, it has happened to me in the past and needs to be fixed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackripper Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 *deleted* Funny made me chuckle Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deano554 Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 That is in fact the reason; you set the transfer to take place at the end of the season, which for some reason makes the minimum fee release null and void. I tried to do that with a player once, same thing happened. But if you set it to immediate, the offer will be accepted. No idea why this is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nik_Dut Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 the minimum price seem to activated only if no added clause in the original bid, thus transfer at the end of season annul the minimum fee clause. my 2 cents. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trekkie_ram Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 Maybe it's not allowed because he has a significant amount of time to negotiate a new contract? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papagie Posted May 29, 2009 Author Share Posted May 29, 2009 ok but the day the transfer deadline closed i put an offer in this time the transfer date was set to next available which is exactly the same date as the end of season date and this time they accepted?! this must be a bug the transfer still goes through on the same date. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NepentheZ Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 Maybe it's not allowed because he has a significant amount of time to negotiate a new contract? Pretty much it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigdanio Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 So the silly post was deleted, but clever old Wiitastic has quoted it, so should I report you too Sir? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NepentheZ Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 Reporting someone for quoting a post is a bit OTT. Perhaps just ask the quoters to kindly edit the quote out? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkus Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 No need; please don't quote stuff you're reporting. It just makes more work when it comes to the clean up. Thanks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.