EnigMattic1

I guess it was a bit of both in that respect.

Would the preferred formation of your HoYD have any effect on the sort of players that would appear in the youth intake?

Let's just say you prefer to play a 4-3-3 DM Wide. In an ideal world, you would have top level coaches with the same preferred formation. But... What would you do if you played a formation that wasn't a typical formation? Like, a strikerless formation, an asymmetrical formation or a Total Voetbol recreation. What formation would you look for in your coaches in that scenario?

Let's say, for example, you play a 4-3-3 formation, but have different playing styles for different scenarios: More attacking for going behind More defensive when ahead More possession based How would you go about training these in order to raise familiarity and cohesion?

I'm not currently at my computer but I have an idea for a tactic and would like some help with something. What I would like to know is, what roles are, essentially, a "blank slate"? And, by "blank slate", I mean similar to the CM(s) in that it has no hard coded instructions.

Is there a limit to the number of changes you can make to kits? One of the teams I've created keeps getting given a third kit and the home and away keep getting changed back to blue and white respectively. This is becoming annoying as verifying the file takes ages.

Which line? That could come in handy.

I did mine in advanced. That may be where the issue is.

What settings would one need to use in the editor? And who would take the place of the respective reserve team should they finish in a promotion position?

I just add more rules. I never had an issue.

What do you mean "20 tiers"? I've got 21 levels in my custom Canadian database.

Ideally, I want to have a similar setup to the MLS in that there is an East/West conference setup for the CPL. But, 2 conferences of 8 teams isn't enough and I don't want to go around sticking random teams in there just to make up the numbers. I would like to bring the likes of Vancouver, Toronto, Montreal, Thunder Bay and FC Manitoba "home" though, but I doubt Thunder Bay and FC Manitoba would be at a CPL level and, given how the CanChamp plays out, the 3 MLS sides "should" walk the league. There are definitely enough teams to use in order to replicate an MLS style pyramid, I mean, the MMSL has over 70 teams and both Vancouver leagues (VMSL and VISL) are pretty full Maybe that is a project for down the line?

The issue with the MLS is going to be the draft. If I recall, unlike the CPL draft, there is a degree of hard coding involved with the MLS drafts.

I gave them a transfer embargo until January 1st (season starts in April and they still take part in the draft) of their first season.

I got it sorted now. I took what you said about the UIDs, remade Windsor, Kelowna and Bridge City to give them higher IDs than Vancouver and, with a bit of tweaking in the registered teams tab, it now works how it should.