bjoggi33 Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 Maybe this is in the wrong section but here it goes . i need some help with my strikers. Wich should i sell, becouse i only have room for 1 striker in my formation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
arsenal_2111 Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 This is more for the Good Player && Team Guide, in the Should I Buy/Sell? Thread Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FM1000 Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 I would go with the either footed regen being my TS and i would train the other to be AML. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
spudgun3000withextraonions Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 Sell the Scotsman. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjoggi33 Posted May 4, 2009 Author Share Posted May 4, 2009 This is more for the Good Player && Team Guide, in the Should I Buy/Sell? Thread Okey mate i shall move it there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amaroq Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 They look quite similar to me - the one on the right has slightly better attributes IMO, but the one on the left has a lot more flexibility. I like the fact that you can play him in more positions than just ST, I like the fact that he is Either footed, and the fact that he's an FC indicates that he has a high hidden Free Role attribute. I don't think you can go wrong by keeping either; is there really no way you can keep both happy in your current formation? Think of the way Sir Alex uses Berbatov, Tevez, and Rooney, keeping each other sharp through constant competition and keeping each other fresh-legged through substitution and rotation. If I had to pick, I wouldn't do it by attribute comparison, I'd consider things like - do your coaches indicate that one likes the big matches, or that one is particularly consistent? Which has you as his Favoured Personnel already, or lists the team as his Favourite Club? Which seems to respond better to you in team talks? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjoggi33 Posted May 4, 2009 Author Share Posted May 4, 2009 Well im on Ruddock's favoured personnel page. I was thinking i change my formation and use Calder as a AMC. Do you think he would be good there and assist Ruddock with goals ? BTW thanks for the good reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amaroq Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 You're welcome! If you're going to sell one, then, I'd sell Calder - Ruddock will be more responsive to your praise/criticism/team talks by virtue of looking up to you as he does. Regarding your tactical shift, a wholehearted endorsement - if that can fit your tactical scheme, I'd be quite inclined to go with the AMC/Free Role position for Calder and the ST position for Ruddock. Calder will help link your midfield with Ruddock, and should play it more as a deep-lying striker than as a midfielder. He definitely has the creativity and passing ability to make it work; remember to bump up his training in Attacking if you go this route. He'll be more effective at it if you can get his Passing up above 15. I'm running a bit of a home-built 4-4-2 based on the TT&F thread, so I definitely have one withdrawn striker (free role, less forward runs, lower mentality, more through balls, etc) and one attacking striker (more forward runs, higher mentality) - I'd be perfectly content slotting Calder into my withdrawn ST/Free Role and Ruddock into my attacking ST role. (Well .. more than content, as they'd utterly dominate for my Blue Square Premier side!!) Note that keeping them both gives you another advantage, namely, that if you suffer a long-term injury to one, you still have the other to rely on, which may keep your title chase from faltering. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.