Stevicus Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 When I have agreed to transfer my players out, i dont play them in the first team, i stick them in the reserves! I mainly do this because i believe players play less well if they have agreed to join another club. sometimes it says they are looking forward to moving clubs under their general happiness. So i dont play them, If they are looking forward to moving, Why should they give 100% in the next league game Does anyone else believe this? P.S I may play them if im desperate, injury crisis has hit or international call ups remove the availability of half my squad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ssestig Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 Stick them in the U18 (or league equivalent) if over 18. Two can play that game and if that declare unhappiness I fine them for unprofessional behaviour. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
atonement Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 if a player has screwed me over and requested a transfer ill overtrain him and get him injured spiteful or what Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevicus Posted February 13, 2009 Author Share Posted February 13, 2009 if a player has screwed me over and requested a transfer ill overtrain him and get him injuredspiteful or what Quite spiteful, I would not want to a footballer on your team Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozzy38 Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 If I'm getting rid of a player I don't put him in the reserves because he could take the place in the team of a developing player, so I keep him in the first team squad but do nothing with him. As for whether I play a good enough player who's leaving, I still give them a go. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ediocy Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 When I have agreed to transfer my players out, i dont play them in the first team, i stick them in the reserves!I mainly do this because i believe players play less well if they have agreed to join another club. sometimes it says they are looking forward to moving clubs under their general happiness. So i dont play them, If they are looking forward to moving, Why should they give 100% in the next league game Does anyone else believe this? P.S I may play them if im desperate, injury crisis has hit or international call ups remove the availability of half my squad. It depends on the player's personality I guess. As for not giving their 100%, you have a perfect flesh-and-blood counter-example for you in David Beckham and Real Madrid before his move to LA Galaxy. Personally, I would only axe players that I have deemed totally surplus to requirements. However those players that I have chosen to let go because they are still useful, just that they will not get enough games the following season due to there being too much competition in that position, I would still play them if the need arises. The relationship between myself and those players count for a lot too. If I am selling a player because he is a bad apple, then to the scrap heap he goes for sure. If he conducted himself in a civil and professional manner prior to, throughout and after the whole transfer negotiation process, he will still feature in my first team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dexta200 Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 I do this too, I would rather play someone who will be with me next season, even if they are a great player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.