AdomiEunwoo Posted September 1, 2020 Share Posted September 1, 2020 How can I improve this tactic ? I'm a games without loose, my team play a beautiful football style with fast passings, but I feel like I need to score more goals, create more space, be a little more offensive and vertical. Most of my games are draws. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Jef- Posted September 1, 2020 Share Posted September 1, 2020 First thing I am noticing is that you've got 3(4) playmakers in 2x DLP+AP(+BPD). You can leave BPD but he is not necesary for playing out of the back. You also want only one playmaker in midfield/attack. You are not vertical enough because you have 3 players occupying roughly the same space and doing exactly the same thing - look to pass. In central mid (dm, cm strata and AMC) you want a ball carrier, a runner and holding player. You can try to play CM-D + BBM as cm pairing and AP-A as your amc. I would put CM-D on the side where you have your more attacking fullback. You can also try DLP-D, BBM, AM-A. CM-D, RPM, SS is also another option with which I had great success earlier. CM-D, RPM, Treq-A is also another option. Another thing preventing verticality is using play out of defense and distribute to full backs at the same time. Your keeper will attempt to distribute to defenders as-is with play out of defense instruction but will not force it. He will skip the first line and go to a free winger, playmaker or even a striker for a quick counter attack. I would take away distribute to full backs. Play out of defense without using distribute to fullbacks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Experienced Defender Posted September 1, 2020 Share Posted September 1, 2020 10 hours ago, AdomiEunwoo said: - As many as 3 playmakers in the closest possible vicinity (even 2 would be overkill, let alone 3) - Extremely aggressive defensive instructions, which not just make you defensively too vulnerable but also deprive your own players of space up front - High tempo coupled with a setup of roles and duties that is obviously possession-oriented These are the most obvious issues you need to address, although there are potentially a couple more. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdomiEunwoo Posted September 2, 2020 Author Share Posted September 2, 2020 The changes worked, thank you, guys. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now