craiigman Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 This is what I mean: Reason I ask is it's not very clear. Examples: Here are the attributes for the above 2 players: Technical: 10/11 average - shows 14/14 on the octagon Mental: 12/11 average - shows 12/12 on the octagon Physical: 10/11 average - shows 10/10 on the octagon So the 3 I thought would add up to averages don't add up, so there must be a different calculation going on. Does anyone know them, as the others aren't quite as simple either. I mean vision is clearly not just the vision attribute, what else goes into it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Enforcer Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 Good question. I was wondering this the other day. Are any attributes used to calculate the value of more than one point in the octagon? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craiigman Posted January 19, 2018 Author Share Posted January 19, 2018 Does no one really know? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pattric_b Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 Technical: dribbling, first touch, technique, Mental: anticipation, bravery, concentration, decisions, determination, teamwork Physical: agility, balance, stamina, strength This is what it was in 17, probably still the same for 18. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craiigman Posted January 20, 2018 Author Share Posted January 20, 2018 6 hours ago, Pattric_b said: Technical: dribbling, first touch, technique, Mental: anticipation, bravery, concentration, decisions, determination, teamwork Physical: agility, balance, stamina, strength This is what it was in 17, probably still the same for 18. What about the other 5? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pattric_b Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 Surly! Aerial: heading, jumping reach Attacking: finishing, composure, off the ball Defending: marking, tackling, positioning Speed: acceleration, pace Vision: passing, flair, vision Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craiigman Posted January 20, 2018 Author Share Posted January 20, 2018 11 hours ago, Pattric_b said: Technical: dribbling, first touch, technique, Mental: anticipation, bravery, concentration, decisions, determination, teamwork Physical: agility, balance, stamina, strength This is what it was in 17, probably still the same for 18. 1 hour ago, Pattric_b said: Surly! Aerial: heading, jumping reach Attacking: finishing, composure, off the ball Defending: marking, tackling, positioning Speed: acceleration, pace Vision: passing, flair, vision Looks like you are correct, thank you for this it is worth noting that it rounds down not up, so 8.6 average = 8 not 9. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Enforcer Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 @Pattric_b I find it strange that aggression, leadership and work rate are not included in the 'mental' calculation and natural fitness is omitted from the 'physical' calculation. You could also argue that long shots should feed into 'attacking' and I would probably have lumped crossing into the 'technical' category. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craiigman Posted January 20, 2018 Author Share Posted January 20, 2018 59 minutes ago, The Enforcer said: @Pattric_b I find it strange that aggression, leadership and work rate are not included in the 'mental' calculation and natural fitness is omitted from the 'physical' calculation. You could also argue that long shots should feed into 'attacking' and I would probably have lumped crossing into the 'technical' category. I have no idea. But I threw all the stats into excel and done an average on those listed and it worked out right. So it seems to be correct. Unsure why certain ones are left out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pattric_b Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 No problem @craiigman! 4 hours ago, The Enforcer said: @Pattric_b I find it strange that aggression, leadership and work rate are not included in the 'mental' calculation and natural fitness is omitted from the 'physical' calculation. You could also argue that long shots should feed into 'attacking' and I would probably have lumped crossing into the 'technical' category. Yeah I've always wondered as well. I figure it's so you can look at the graph quickly to see the players strong areas? Like if you look just at the polygraph and see the player has more speed than anything you can presume he is probably a wide player. Or if they have mostly defending, aerial and physical attributes then the player is usually suited to play center back. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.