-
Content Count
2,962 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
282 "I mean, funny like I'm a clown? I amuse you?"About Keyzer Soze
-
Rank
Semi Pro
About Me
-
About Me
Barreiro, Portugal
Interests
-
Interests
FM
Favourite Team
-
Favourite Team
Benfica
Currently Managing
-
Currently Managing
Benfica
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Help tweaking my 433
Keyzer Soze replied to Keyzer Soze's topic in Tactics, Training & Strategies Discussion
@Experienced Defender Just one more question. If i changed on of the wide players to a IW(s), should I changed the left or the right one. I believe that the IW is more a creator, and helps more in the build up phase of the play, while the IF is more forward/attacking thinking. Is that correct? So, perhaps changed the left IF to a IW(s) so that my left side, with the DLP(s), builds up, and my right side, with the IF and the MEZ gets advantage of that, perhaps from a quick pass to the opposite side. What do you think? -
Help tweaking my 433
Keyzer Soze replied to Keyzer Soze's topic in Tactics, Training & Strategies Discussion
OK, thanks to all that give feedback. -
Help tweaking my 433
Keyzer Soze replied to Keyzer Soze's topic in Tactics, Training & Strategies Discussion
But, having on the same side, a MEZ(a) with a WB(s) behind him, isn't too risky? Because both have make forwards runs instruction. That was the reason I've changed the MEZ to a support duty, to be more balanced in the midfield. But... Knock on effect, the MEZ(s)+IF(s) isn't working to well. I also tryed MEZ(s) +IW(s) but it was pretty much the same thing. Could help give the right IF(s) to sit narrow? -
Hi, Would like some advice on these setups. I'm happy with how my team is playing, but having some doubts regarding the role of the AMR, FBR and the forward. Which one is more balanced?
-
under review Bug on promoting players form B team
Keyzer Soze replied to Keyzer Soze's topic in Bugs Found on Android
@Harrison Modeste It's fixed. We can now promote players from the B team. One thing that is different from FMT20, but i suppose its the way it should be now, is that FMT20 you could control the training from players that were in the B team. In FMT21 you need to promote them to the main team to control the training. -
Anyone try to buy him?
-
exploit tactic for fm15-16-17-18-19 or 20?
Keyzer Soze replied to lucazz's topic in Tactics Sharing Centre (Upload/Download)
@lucazz I understand, but what you must realise is that you were able to create tactics, like the ones you've described, because there were flaws in the match engine. And because of that you could achieve unrealistic results. With the evolution of the match engine, that sort of "magic" tactic are harder to make if not impossible. The purpose of SI is to make a game that is closer to reality as possible, so I'm afraid that you will struggle to make a tactic that can have the type of results you want. -
exploit tactic for fm15-16-17-18-19 or 20?
Keyzer Soze replied to lucazz's topic in Tactics Sharing Centre (Upload/Download)
I think that since FM13 or 14 those kind of exploits were fixed by the evolution of the match engine. Things like having a Center Back scoring 30goals from corners just don't happen any more. But, by searching the forum you can easily find good tactics that almost can guarantee back to back promotions even with lesser teams. -
That's a good point. The players that i have in my Benfica team are much more suited to play a possession style of play. My main tactic, that i use pretty mucu in every match is this DLF(a) IF(s) IW(s) DLP(s) MEZ(a) DM(d) WB(a) CD(d) CD(d) WB(s) SK(s) Mentality: Positive Team Instructions: POOD, Be More Creative, WBIB, Counter Press, Higher LOE I also set a split block, with the 3 forwards + Mezzala with more pressing. But i can't go play with this tactic aga