fc.cadoni
-
Posts
2,652 -
Joined
Content Type
Forums
Articles
FAQs
Online Manual
Support: Blocks
Support: Games
Bug Tracker
SIGames Manual (beta)
Profiles
Issue Comments posted by fc.cadoni
-
-
27 minutes ago, SLB-Dark-Angel said:
If probably they left the game untouched after launch just updating bugs and not the AI and match engine, the game was a dream on first launched, apart from what I wrote before now we have scores like 3-12, 6-3, 5-4... etc like on previous years after updates WHEN THE THING IS ALMOST PERFECT DON'T TOUCH IT, DON´T RUIN IT
AFTER LAST UPDATE:
- STUPID SCORES ( like 3-12, 6-3, 5-4...)
- PLAYERS BEHAVE STUPIDLY (Wrong passes, sometimes don´t run to the ball letting opponents get the ball when opponents are further away from the ball, goalkeepers not grabbing on supposedly easy saves, lots of penalties and own goals,shooting is more unrealistic now, like I said before it is easy to score 25 to 30 meters away from the goal than 1 meter in front of the goal, etc, etc, etc)
I will send some PKMºs the reason I did not save any PKM is because I am starting new SAVES over and over again because the game become so unrealistic now.As Kyle Brown have wrote you, PKM with mark time stamp to guide people where is the problem.
0 -
Are you using custom files? 22.3 game version? Upload a save game before your sacking so SI can investigate further.
1 -
16' min: Demostenes scoring goal, cutting and dribbling toward the GK. 1-0
Demostenes is back-up IWB, but injury crisis in Brazil is something usual; had to play him IF in AMR.
31' min: Antonio Jose scoring goal, cutting and dribbling toward the GK. 2-0
Antonio Jose is youth IWB, same selection as Demostenes; injury crisis hit me hard so I had to play him as IF in AML.
====
====
If those two players can cut inside with the ball; I am pretty sure Messi can.
0 -
7 hours ago, kertiek said:
@fc.cadoni sure sure ... "keep the fully working tactic" as u wish .. for me its easier to add you to the ignore list since u refuse to show proof of a working tactic with IF/IW actually dribbling and winning 1v1s consistently. good luck
i dont have to convince you of anything .. there is other users that share my opinion about the non existant dribbling issue
You claim here that something is not working. Can you prove it to developer? Not in me kertiek. Don't hide from other user experience.
0 -
3 hours ago, kertiek said:
share your tactifc to test it on a versus mode with psg, if messi neymar and mbappe start cutting inside and actually dribbling leaving defenders behind ill stop posting about it.
I am not the one which gonna post a preset gegenpress 433 DM Wide tactic with little tweaks. I can’t see your evidence that IF does not cut inside WITH the ball in 22.4. Can you prove it? Yes or no? If no, stop spreading rumours and misleading people. Enough.
0 -
Have you updated PGE? Newest version must be shown like this:
====
People > Player (around 300.000 players)
====
I have set the filter to show me only 500 players, because 300.000 players with i7 8550U will take some time to show me the results
====
PGE Issue or IGE Issue?
0 -
It will be REALLY helpful for coders if you provide your examples, with pkm files, with your save game file and your experience; rather someone else. Because everyone have different tactic setting, facing different AI manager, in different league, in different situations.
Generic things does not help the game to have forward direction.
0 -
5 hours ago, kertiek said:
when is the lack of dribbling going to be addressed? winter patch did nothing about this problem
I see my IF constantly cutting inside WITH the ball after 22.4 ME
0 -
It's re-calculating / re-balancing the CA of the player. If a player with CA 90 and PA 100 receive-focus in training more physical; means will decrease mental & technical in order to gain physical which has higher weighting from technical & mental.
0 -
Hi,
Have you click "Specify Attributes Values" first?
0 -
Same problem here. I can't assign Analyst
0 -
Took a new job, in Brazil with FLU. World Knowledge was 5%, now 9% within a month.
Here an example of Uruguay Scouter, Until Finished in Uruguay (no other filters). Uruguay is not loaded in my save. Within a month, 3 reports.
Here an example of Brazilian, Argentinian, Colombian Scouters, Until Finished in Brazil, Argentina, Colombia (no other filters). Brazil is loaded in my save. Within a month.
How it looks those reports
====
0 -
Just now, Kyle Brown said:
Really sorry, we tried to reproduce this issue from the save provided but unfortunately we need one prior to the meeting itself. I imagine it may be a bit late to ask for that now, but if you spot it again and could provide us with a new example it would be very much appreciated!
Hi @Kyle Brown,
Yeah, for sure!
0 -
3 minutes ago, Jamaicaman90 said:
I don't think fault can implied to be user error when the game lets you set up dead-end scouting assignments that any reasonable person would believe would provide returns. If region scouting is useless, it should be fixed, or removed from the game. Top quality scouts being paid a wage and expenses, to gain little to no knowledge of their assigned region's countries and with no reports made is clearly a game issue rather than a user issue.
The Until Finished/Ongoing aspect at best is a problem with making clear to the user what those options represent, but realistically should not exist in these two formats if your explanation is true. 'Ongoing' should mean a continuous focus on maximising knowledge for a region, and adding to their reports new players within their remit (e.g. players transferring into a region, newgens, players becoming valid within the filter parameters such as contract status).
JPA/JPP your explanation seems correct to me, but doesn't explain the wider issue being discussed here.
Overall, the percentage rating of scout knowledge should be independent of whether or not a league is loaded. The percentage should increase over time without being linked to specific games, and should impact what percentage of players the scout (and therefore your club) are aware of to appear in player search, regardless of if they have ben scouted further or have no reports to their name whatsoever.This isn't a dig against you personally, and I acknowledge that a lot of what you've said in this thread is based on evidence. However, I can't agree that newcomers (and indeed more exerpeicned players) fail to find this information. The game is at times obtuse by design, which is a good thing for realism rather than being an exercise in min/maxing, but this issue makes no sense either in a gaming context or a real life representation context. It's either a bug, or otherwise a poor design decision that needs to be re-evaluated.
Perhaps in the scouting assignment options, an option should be included to make the scouts focus on gaining area knowledge primarily or obtaining player reports primarily, rather than (if you're correct) this confusion about 'Until Finished' vs 'Ongoing'. If there is a design choice at play to stop players absolutely maximising scouting returns, this would be a way of making the player make weighted decisions.
You have to understand how the scouting works, actually; rather than saying is clearly a game issue. Anyway,
Scouting Region: You send that scouter when has already knowledge in that region (all nations which include that region, the bigger the more hard). Region is a huge land and send him as "Ongoing" makes the scouters to ping-pong traveling; rather than scouting. The amount of games you set the scouter to watch is extreme high. Plus we have the memory reset, so; it makes perfectly sense to me that a scouter having hard time to produce any report from a generic region. What the best method for Scouting Region?
1. Send the scouter to gain knowledge for A,B,C nations (in the region which interested to scout later) which don't have knowledge. Duration: 1 year or 6 months or Until Finished. When that scouter gain 100% knowledge; then go to other nation and so on.
2. When the scouter knows the region, send him as ongoing to maintain that knowledge.
So, for me it's more user "error" (more like a wrong assumption how a thing works). I had similar results as Zealand before with the game (following "guides"), until tested things myself; which in most cases what I have followed is completely wrong from how actually working.
There is no point for SI to dictate of how to scout, but it can be more clear the manual; agree with that.
Scouting Region is not broken, need a different approach and understanding.
0 -
6 minutes ago, GreatMarinho said:
I'm not quite sure if you see the problem here, but please show us what Zealand did wrong in the Video. ^^
It's about Region Scouting.I can see where the problem is, but in his first attempt did not load the nation & leagues which affect things.
In second video, did load the things (database & leagues); but came after two years of processing; where the game reset things (to free up memory, like the statistics from a league etc).
Also, scouters with zero knowledge of a nation need to be setup in "Until Finished" to gain knowledge and since they have gained knowledge need "Ongoing". So, ongoing means that the scouter gonna roam-travel more rather that watching games. "Ongoing" is not optional to gain any knowledge.
JPA/JPP isn't as well for finding the best, but about the quality of reports for X player.
0 -
It will be really helpful for SI Developers to see examples (save games) about this, rather than a video; because everyone use the scouting in different ways and combinations.
1 -
3 hours ago, GreatMarinho said:
After seeing this Video - it makes Scouting in places where the League isn't loaded completely useless - which in turn makes Scouting completely useless - kinda sad.
Seems like newcomers to FM fail or don't know exactly where to find information about how things working inside the game. Ok.
For start, take a look here. Secondly, if you have an English Scouter to Scout in Nigeria (if you have load the Nigeria in db); you have to send him "Until Finished", not "Ongoing". Apart from that, here a brief guide about scouting.
0 -
This is very generic. You need to provide save game and examples as well. Read here
0 -
What is your setup from here?
0 -
2 hours ago, Deadshot said:
Yes, I have those roles in my tactic, but the problem is that even though I train the players for the roles that are in my tactic, on the tactic familiarity panel, if you look up there, it's showing BWM for every player. As you can see, I'm training Hagi as an inside forward. but on the tactic familiarity panel it shows BWM.
Interesting!
0 -
Is your tactic having BWM or IF? Training schedules has "Attributes: Individual Roles" and Tactical Familiarity?
0 -
1 hour ago, Kyle Brown said:
We'll have a look at this as soon as we can, thank you for raising it.
Thank you, @Kyle Brown!
0 -
This may be your answer:
0 -
Upload your save game so SI can take a look:
0
Training Session Breakdown
in Medical and Development Centre, Training and Finances
Posted
Hi @Michael Sant,
Any update on this?