Jump to content
Sports Interactive Community

WorcesterLegend

Members+
  • Content Count

    608
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About WorcesterLegend

  • Rank
    Amateur

Favourite Team

  • Favourite Team
    Zulia FC

Currently Managing

  • Currently Managing
    Worcester City

Recent Profile Visitors

1,002 profile views
  1. I kind of support OP's point, i could see players from a mid-low table saying that of bournemouth or fulham, but not a player in the team leading the championship, heck even the leeds situation proves the "dream" move is a little extreme, dream move should be a team on mid table of the next tier, not a team fighting for relegation/mid low table i could see the "i want to play in the premiership" moan, but not a "dream" same happened to one of my players wanting to go to madrid, he was gone on a free since madrid was behind him a 3 whole years and couldn't renew his contract. After he was gone madrid got eliminated from CL in group stage and i won it for what he leaved? The difference between both clubs was small (both at 5 stars) i guess the problem here is the reputation difference is too low for that to trigger
  2. Loan only if you can't affort to use him at least as rotation (as a sub/playing him to rest a first teamer) leave him available to play U23 so he keeps a good shape U23 does makes the player progress but not as much as playing 20ish games for you or a full season for a mid table/top team Follow Snorks' rules, if no team meets that criteria for a loan then try to play him in cups/non strong teams to not stagnate him
  3. Im not sure about the points given but im sure that EFL cup league indeed gives points, checkatrade doesn't give afaik as that cup is played by the U23 team so the U23 manager gets the points (if gives any)
  4. They are just there for other options in contracts, there is not impact at all, players won't accept huge goal bonuses if wage is lowered a lot, also player won't accept hugely lowered bonuses if wage is not increased this are just monetary figures, nothing to do with performance, you can make players accept lower wages if bonuses are high even add non reacheable bonuses for them to accept like offering relegation release clause when your team is at the top (less effective than with low table teams)
  5. They are just there for other options in contracts, there is not impact at all, players won't accept huge goal bonuses if wage is lowered a lot, also player won't accept hugely lowered bonuses if wage is not increased this are just monetary figures, nothing to do with performance, you can make players accept lower wages if bonuses are high even add non reacheable bonuses for them to accept like offering relegation release clause when your team is at the top (less effective than with low table teams)
  6. Game won't recognize the difference, happened to me in 17 and 19, unfair? Maybe but at the same time think about the player's point of view, you are at the exact same situation (kinda) but in premier league, the player thinks he is capable of playing for a another low table team (or even get a offer from top teams) so will want crazy money Just play the season and hope for a miracle 17th finish if you do some wise signings is possible to survive any back to back promotion or surprise promotion
  7. Brasil have the state leagues (piece of cake for uber teams) argentina and i think uruguay or paraguay also has the average points where you could not get relegated if get a monaco like season due to your performance in the last 3 season, other leagues are straight forward all vs all league, some add a playoff or a 2 part league (kinda like summer/winter league) where the champions of each part get to play for the title You won't see weird stuff like USA/Australia systems
  8. If you mean the bonuses for winning the league and stuff that cut your transfer budget, the only thing noticeable is a boost in morale so it can improve team performance, lets just say it will make the players less relaxed as they can go from getting a 200k+ on wages and contract bonuses per week to getting that plus a nice 3M more or less more in one go, some players don't mind it that much for ex. Messi/Ronaldo don't mind much about it as they already have all the money they need/wish Stats wise there is no change, but i would assume that under the hood it has to change something else like making the players more prone to give the 110% and not just play at their 80% against huddersfield
  9. Well, thats actually normal, thats why Balotelli, Hulk, Robinho, Bojan, etc. Didn't shine, there is also playing time plus decent/good level competition, thats why teams like southampton produce so many playera, they play a rather neutral level in the best league in the world, almost any non star could play a lot of games as they have no super player demanding to play 80% of the games. For the record, any time i took a team in championship/low premier league regens with very good PA would just sky rocket after a season or 2 i have also seem player i loan with 2 stars CA sky rocketing to 4 CA in half a season you could be doing something terrible wrong, expecting too much or seeing the stars rating too much
  10. Agents are like that if you get them on thier bad side, maybe you have a bad reputation with him, but 160M is just nuts you do have to wait for mbappe to transfer list himself by request to drop down the price tag, also, it could be good to get in his agent's good side by signing some of his players (you could just sign decent prospects or decent player that are cheap and loan to recover your money) that way you could get a 75% discount on that fee and even lower mbappe's wage and bonuses
  11. Yeah having a rather easy group helped them, but what i found more amusing is that 4 out 5 african nation reached round of 16 and only the top 2 nation in south america reached that phase
  12. Afaik, they will generate regens i kinda remember seeing the names of their actual players, but i think that was in fm17 or 16
  13. Most of the champions i have seem are rather expected or i have seem them growth to be a contender, but seeing Zambia, Venezuela, and guinea bissau get past quarter finals was amazing especially zambia that gone to the final and got crushed by netherlands
  14. Im aware that that kind of "sacking" comes when there aren't enough players for the team to be considered playable, most likely there aren't many U23 chinese players so the team got unavailable for human manager to manage so you got "sacked"
  15. Perhaps you are looking at it the wrong way, in 6 seasons in the way we all play is enough to make a team rather strong in continental competitions, if your team improves a lot the intakes will look "rubbish" for example, i have a save around 2060 where most youths coming from my academy aren't even at 2 stars potential and is rare for me to see one with 3 stars potential, because i have already the best team in the world with a rotation just as good so chances of getting a better player than what i have are as slim as the chances of a wonderkid spawning in Tuvalu
×
×
  • Create New...