Jump to content

kalokalitokalo

Members+
  • Posts

    74
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by kalokalitokalo

  1. Hi all,

    I have a doubt regarding taxes and player/staff decisions:

    - For example, if I'm PSG and I offer 7.2 millions wage to a player, his net wage is going to be around 3.7

    - If I'm Monaco, these 7,2 million would be 6.25 net wage.

     

    Assuming that the rest would be the same (and also reputation, etc), which sum would take the player into consideration for its decision, the 7.2 or the 3.7/6.25?

     

    Thanks in advance

  2. I'm having the same issue when I've tried to get a new version of the same skin, now I can't get any skin to work (even the last one I had working previously). As soon as I click reload skin I get the empty screen I put below and I can't even close the game.

     

    Edit: After I force the game to close via task manager, when I try to re-open the game it crash. Then I have to erase the FM22 folder from my documents to get it to start again.

    image.thumb.png.40a5bc4c215ef77b91f1f5945adedae9.png

  3. hace 19 horas, DhcSylar dijo:

    According to the current test results of FM arena,  Finishing has little impact on the winning rate, but this attribute occupies a very high weight of forecourt players, which is really unacceptable to me

    1.jpg

    2.jpg

     

    This is normal. For example, researchers tend to put central defenders slower than they really are, as an example de Ligt:

    - 12 acc & 14 pace

    You see Chiesa:

    - 16 acc & 18 pace

     

     

    And this kind of things seems to be a rule: central defender o central midfielers tend to have lower Acc/Pace than they really should.

     

    Then, my theory is that when FM arena reduce Pace/Acc the impact is bigger than with other attributes. If this was corrected it would mean in lower impact of these attributes and bigger of others like composure. Just my guess.

     

    What I use to do is to edit the database tu put these attributes higher in all the CBs and search for the list of fastest players in each league (in example Marcos Llorente only 14-14 while he is equal as fast as Vinicius, who gets 18-17).

  4. hace 2 horas, kalokalitokalo dijo:

    Yesterday I tested in holidays with Atletico de Madrid and result was 2nd position but only 65 goals scored. Something like 28 thousand passes.

    Right now I'm testing it with a small tweak: Pressing Forward support instead of F9.

    Test done: 85 points, +80 goals scored and low 20s goals against. 27.800 passes.

    Won super cup (against madrid and barcelona), and eliminated in CL against liverpool in 1/4 with a 6-0 defeat.

     

    As everything was left to Assistant, Suarez was sold to PSG in January  (by that time 20 matches and 14 goals)

  5. Thanks mate!

     

    These are what I'm using for ambition (<integer value="Pamb" />) and professionalism (<integer value="Ppro" />). But it doesn't work. Maybe hidden attributes don't work for analyzer widget?

     

    With my last question about the integer values for the attributes, I was wondering if there is a list somewhere for the normal attributes (technicals, mentals, physicals) to make sure that I'm using the correct ones:

    I am using this, but not sure if they are ok. Is there any list so I can check?

    image.png.cf7a69963863eac352f1ed0faa355352.png

     

    Thank you for your help @wkdsoul! Your amazing personal skin served me as inspiration to make things at my own.

  6. Thank you @wkdsoul for your response.

     

    As you can see in the image, I have it activated (I got the <integer value="Pamb" /> <!-- ambition--> & <integer value="Ppro" /> <!-- professionalism--> from the hidden attributes table:

    image.png.0508b6ae2fcca5a1f2b8bb71ec5ef444.png

     

    Let me ask another question, is there a list with the integer value for all attributes? I may be getting the Professionalism and Ambition wrong...

     

    Thanks again!

  7. Hi guys,

     

    I need some help because I'm trying to adapt the player/goalkeeper atribute analyser to my needs but I'm not capable of putting the hiden personality atributes in it:

    This is the text I'm putting, it workd with normal atributes such as composure, etc., but it's not working with hidden ones as you can see in the image below:

            <record id="item">
            <string id="name" value="DEV"/> 
            <real id="max_value" value="20" />
            <integer id="angle" value="324" />
            <colour id="colour" name="grey" />
            <flags id="standard_spec" value="title" />
              <flags id="size" value="small" />

            <list id="attributes">


    <integer value="Pamb" /> <!-- ambition-->
    <integer value="Ppro" /> <!-- professionalism-->

            </list>
          </record>

     

    image.png.3f9308d2a062a6989affbeef7a70c627.png

     

    Is it possible?

     

    Thank you!

  8. @Panneton0 thank you! You've achieved something I've been trying since FM19! Seeing nice wins with +800 passes or even +1000 passes is wonderful!

     

    I've tried with Milan and got the Serie A with 87 points (expected 5th if I remember correctly) in first season. In the second with a more adapted squad to the tactical needs I'm doing even better...

     

    I've also tried to convert the tactic to a 343 diamond (one full back as CB cover in the midle and other full back to the RCM as OAD with the same PIs as the LCM) and it's doing well also! I use it in some escenarios, like when I face parked buses.

  9. 1 hour ago, Jack Joyce said:

    As I said before, the PI page is different to the TI. 'Shorter' on the PI page does not mean the same thing as 'Shorter' on the TI page.

    'Standard' on the PI page means in comparison to the TI level. If your TI is much shorter and your PI is standard, then the player will pass much shorter.

    I understand it's a bit confusing and it is something we want to improve in the future so it's more clear.

    I think you both are talking about different things.

     

    I believe he means why not having Much shorter - Shorter - Standard - More direct - Much more direct options in PI page.

  10. 3 hours ago, crusadertsar said:

    It's an interesting idea but with two Anchormen might make your midfield a bit too consery and stale. As some noted on here before the trick with this tactic is in its aggressive pressing and overwhelming the opponent in the half-spaces. Your formation looks too bottom heavy and defensive to that effectively in my opinion. But try it out and let us know how it works. Maybe you can prove me wrong :)

    It didn't work.

    Anchors were both in the center together despite the stay wider instruction. And results were not good, specially against 4-2-3-1.

×
×
  • Create New...