Soul_Linneus Posted January 6, 2009 Author Share Posted January 6, 2009 You might want to try posting links rather than the actual images as it takes ages for the page to load up For me it takes less than a second to load everything. To most people it would take a lot longer to open all the images with a link then op load this page once. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soul_Linneus Posted January 6, 2009 Author Share Posted January 6, 2009 CA170+ 2008: 64 players 2010: 107 2012: 123 2014: 117 2016: 104 2018: 72 2020: 55 2022: 36 This is obviously going in the wrong direction. PA185+ 2008: 70 2010: 66 2012: 63 2014: 69 2016: 69 2018: 73 2020: 69 2022: 68 CA140+ age<or=18 2008: 4 2010: 1 2012: 1 2014: 0 2016: 3 2018: 2 2020: 1 2022: 0 CA145+ PA170+ age<or=20 (wonderkid criteria) 2008: 17 2010: 26 2012: 5 2014: 10 2016: 5 2018: 20 2020: 6 2022: 4 CA155+ PA170+ age<or=22 2008: 36 2010: 48 2012: 31 2014: 8 2016: 13 2018: 19 2020: 28 2022: 13 CA165+ PA170+ age<or=24 2008: 26 2010: 54 2012: 36 2014: 18 2016: 11 2018: 17 2020: 15 2022: 20 Champions League Winner 2009: Roma (vs. Juventus) 2010: Barcelona (vs. Arsenal) 2011: FC Bayern (vs. Barcelona) 2012: R. Madrid (vs. Arsenal) 2013: Barcelona (vs. Arsenal) 2014: AC Milan (vs. Barcelona) 2015: Arsenal (vs. Milan) 2016: Liverpool (vs. Barcelona) 2017: Valencia (vs. Barcelona) 2018: Juventus (vs. Man City) 2019: Juventus (vs. Arsenal) 2020: Barcelona (vs. Liverpool) 2021: Barcelona (vs. Inter) 2022: Liverpool (vs. Valencia) World Cup Winner 2010: Argentina (vs. Germany) 2014: Argentina (vs. Cameroon) 2018: Spain (vs. Brazil) 2022: England (vs. Peru) European Championship Winner 2012: Holland (vs. Italy) 2016: Turkey (vs. Spain) 2020: Italy (vs. Serbia) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmyriddle Posted January 6, 2009 Share Posted January 6, 2009 ENGLAND WON THE WORLD CUP YESSSS!!!!!!! against.................. ????Peru???? must be some good regens for them Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
small Mac Posted January 6, 2009 Share Posted January 6, 2009 CA170+ 2008: 64 players 2010: 107 2012: 123 2014: 117 2016: 104 2018: 72 2020: 55 2022: 36 This is obviously going in the wrong direction. It seems the game is struggling to maintain the correct levels of CA. I guess the difficulty is that CA progression is determined by many factors such as training facilities, coaches, game time etc. which obv differs greatly from club to club. This was also the case for FM08, but i think for this version it is alot better if still far from perfect. PA185+ 2008: 70 2010: 66 2012: 63 2014: 69 2016: 69 2018: 73 2020: 69 2022: 68 PA seems relatively stable which is unsuprising as the game can simply determine the levels of PA to distibute based on how the game is progressing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soul_Linneus Posted January 7, 2009 Author Share Posted January 7, 2009 ENGLAND WON THE WORLD CUP YESSSS!!!!!!! against.................. ????Peru???? must be some good regens for them I checked the Peru side and there aren't really many good regens. Players have a CA somewhere between 130 and 150. Probably just a lucky run. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soul_Linneus Posted January 7, 2009 Author Share Posted January 7, 2009 ENGLAND WON THE WORLD CUP YESSSS!!!!!!! against.................. ????Peru???? must be some good regens for them And the premiership is the only league loaded. May have something to do with it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ljuba82 Posted January 7, 2009 Share Posted January 7, 2009 I checked the Peru side and there aren't really many good regens. Players have a CA somewhere between 130 and 150. Probably just a lucky run. Well if CA levels are generally low, then players with CA 130-150 are not so bad Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RT-- Posted January 7, 2009 Share Posted January 7, 2009 Interesting thread, this. One thing to bear in mind, when reporting numbers of player above a certain CA - how does the total number of players for each year compare the total number of players there were at the beginning of the game? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soul_Linneus Posted January 7, 2009 Author Share Posted January 7, 2009 Interesting thread, this.One thing to bear in mind, when reporting numbers of player above a certain CA - how does the total number of players for each year compare the total number of players there were at the beginning of the game? Well, I'm not using Genie, but FMRTE which had a search function too. Maybe if i'd have CA and PA set to 0-200 and age set to 0-99, players only it could give me a number. I should try that when i get home. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.