dido53 Posted March 26, 2021 Share Posted March 26, 2021 I play with city for a long term save ı become champıon but ım not creatıng much chances.attackıng movement is not lıke ı want ım open to help Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Experienced Defender Posted March 26, 2021 Share Posted March 26, 2021 Tight marking makes no sense in a system like yours + does not go hand in hand with aggressive pressing. Fullback roles are too conservative for such style of play, so change them both into WB on support. Switch the AMR's duty to support for better attacking movement and interaction between him and the attacking mezzala. Change the AML's role into IF, because you need someone up front that will be primarily focused on scoring and attacking the box more directly and decisively. Remove the dribble less TI, because you manage one of the technically best players in the world. In fact, run at defence would make a lot more sense. Remove the pass into space as well, or at least use it only on a situational base. Because there is hardly going to be space to take advantage of when you manage a top team that for the most part faces very defensive opposition. Do not insist on working the ball into the box, because the instruction can needlessly overcomplicate your attacking play. You probably don't need the attacking team mentality either. Given the reputation of your team, it's more likely to lead to a lot of wasted opportunities than make you more dangerous attacking-wise. Positive is quite good. These are the most obvious issues IMO. There are potentially a couple more, but let's leave them for later if needs be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dido53 Posted March 26, 2021 Author Share Posted March 26, 2021 (edited) 2 saat önce, Experienced Defender said: Tight marking makes no sense in a system like yours + does not go hand in hand with aggressive pressing. Fullback roles are too conservative for such style of play, so change them both into WB on support. Switch the AMR's duty to support for better attacking movement and interaction between him and the attacking mezzala. Change the AML's role into IF, because you need someone up front that will be primarily focused on scoring and attacking the box more directly and decisively. Remove the dribble less TI, because you manage one of the technically best players in the world. In fact, run at defence would make a lot more sense. Remove the pass into space as well, or at least use it only on a situational base. Because there is hardly going to be space to take advantage of when you manage a top team that for the most part faces very defensive opposition. Do not insist on working the ball into the box, because the instruction can needlessly overcomplicate your attacking play. You probably don't need the attacking team mentality either. Given the reputation of your team, it's more likely to lead to a lot of wasted opportunities than make you more dangerous attacking-wise. Positive is quite good. These are the most obvious issues IMO. There are potentially a couple more, but let's leave them for later if needs be. After your opınıon this is my final tactic wingbacks already joıns attack so ı dıdnt add anythıng.ı wıll add maybe move ın to channel and get further forward to bbm.ı am consıderıng shoot less to players.ı am thınkıng about strıkers role false nıne or dlf last questıon ıs what about lıne of engagement Edited March 26, 2021 by dido53 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Experienced Defender Posted March 26, 2021 Share Posted March 26, 2021 I did not suggest changing the striker's duty and did not mention the LOE. But anyway, test this new tactic and see what happens. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Experienced Defender Posted March 26, 2021 Share Posted March 26, 2021 And I also did not mention the attacking width. I don't know why you changed it to the fairly narrow. Simply leave it on default and do not overcomplicate things when there is no reason for that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dido53 Posted March 26, 2021 Author Share Posted March 26, 2021 54 dakika önce, Experienced Defender said: I did not suggest changing the striker's duty and did not mention the LOE. But anyway, test this new tactic and see what happens. ı dıdnt say u did ım sayıng ım tryıng to fıgure out whıch ıs better for strıker. 44 dakika önce, Experienced Defender said: And I also did not mention the attacking width. I don't know why you changed it to the fairly narrow. Simply leave it on default and do not overcomplicate things when there is no reason for that. yes ı wıll change ıt to default Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Experienced Defender Posted March 26, 2021 Share Posted March 26, 2021 4 hours ago, dido53 said: ı dıdnt say u did ım sayıng ım tryıng to fıgure out whıch ıs better for strıker Better is what fits the system better. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now