Jump to content
  • IWB in-possession behaviour feedback/suggestion


    autohoratio
    • Public Status: Under Review Save Game: autohoratio FM24 Throw-in Taker Issue.fm Files Uploaded: Save Game
     Share

    Prefix note: This is quite a niche issue, perhaps not a bug, but I thought I'd provide feedback here nonetheless. The IWB behaviour I'm describing here isn't necessarily bad, just for recreating the described real life tactics - I'm sure the majority of players have no problem with it, and I'm sure I wouldn't either if I was just making an IWB tactic from scratch. Overall I really like how the role plays in FM24!

    I'm playing a 4-3-3DM with an IWB on one side (DL) and an IFB on the other (DR). Tactically I'm trying to make something similar to Pep/Arteta/Maresca and am using them for reference, particularly the latter.

    When my team are in possession, I'm finding that my IWB isn't inverting enough into midfield, is sitting a bit wider than I'd like.

    The first example is from kickoffs: this is my team shape when kicking off, and my IWB (#3 Andreasen) and IFB (#2 Heinze) are in the "standard" non-inverted positions. (pictured is at 01:55 in the attached match)

    image_3.png.2ba5d5edaea4545d4d777f18650a3eca.png

    However, let's compare that to Enzo Maresca's Leicester City as an example (screenshots from this video). This screenshot is taken a couple of seconds after kickoff (in order to show the defenders who were out of frame before that), but as you can see, their inverted wing back (DR) is already next to the defensive midfielder (DM) from the outset, and the rest of the defenders have already formed a back three, and this behaviour is what I'm trying to emulate with my tactic. Out of possession they function as a 4-3-3 (or 4-4-2 when pressing), but their trigger to invert occurs earlier in the possession phase than in FM24.

    image.jpeg.4939b40a745b2a1c48d6d2ec2f98b99c.jpeg

    Going back to the FM24 tactic, it's only after the kickoff has been taken that my IWB (#3 Andreasen) begins to invert. (Pictured is at 01:59 in the attached match). At 28:10 in the match, my IWB only inverts 30 seconds after the goal kick is taken, once my DM finally receives the ball and progresses out of the defensive third of the pitch. At 32:55 the ball is passed back to my GK, and again my IWB only inverts once the ball is passed out of the defensive third
    What I've also noticed is that there's a bigger horizontal gap between my IWB and DM versus Leicester's IWB and DM. Leicester's pair stay approx 7.5-10 metres (25-32ft) apart horizontally most of the time, whereas my pair tend to stay closer to 15 metres apart horizontally (each "square" on the FM24 pitch is ~7.5 metres for comparison) most of the time.

    image_2.png.243d5cfad29b7b5fce572073f6a6831e.png

    Here's what my team's average position with the ball looked like. As you can see, my IWB (#3) is wider than my DCL (#4).
    image.png.74176d3743575d3358253e2c5979d5d5.png

    For comparison, here are Leicester's average in-possession positions from a match this season (from markstatsbot on twitter - not the same match as the above screenshot unfortunately as I couldn't find positions for that one), but their IWB (#21) is more central than the DCR (#3), and in fact is quite high up the pitch.
    image.png.7773e37b4815dbb26f1b1e681de92dad.png

    Finally, another aspect where recreating Leicester's buildup play isn't possible is goal kicks. This is what Leicester's looks like, with the IWB (DR) having already inverted (from this video) although admittedly Leicester immediately give the ball away and concede a goal 😅
    2023-10-19_2.jpg.c77925662ddecf9cec8da14ac2e22d09.jpg
    Example from another match this season:
     

    In FM24 though, both the IWB and IFB hug the flank from short goal kicks:
    image_1.png.39c7fb8fdc48b87075738f125414103f.png

    Finally, here's an example from a different match (timestamp 20:04). My DCL (#4) has the ball inside the box, and the team begins build-up play again with the IWB and IFB sitting wide. Then instead of inverting fully, the IWB just underlaps the winger, and only briefly enters the central column of the pitch when my DCR (#5) receives the ball. This is perhaps closer to the behaviour I would expect from a standard WB role with the "Underlap Left" Team Instruction set, which I do not have active. Not inherently bad, but not what I'm looking for (the box midfield shape). Again at 23:40, he runs wide when the team are in possession rather than inverting.

     


    The simplest way I can think of (this might be more Feature Request territory though - let me know if you think I should post this next part there) to modify the IWB behaviour is with a change to the Player Instructions menu for that role:

    The "Sit Narrower" PI is currently hard-locked for the IWB role. I propose that to keep the current behaviour the same, the instruction is deselected (i.e. the same as the Full Back role's PI). The "Sit Narrower" PI would then make the IWB invert for goal kicks, kickoffs etc, look to invert earlier in the build-up phase and stay within the central column of the pitch more often.

    image.png.8a6d823e2ffd4e1b28855ec156beb4a3.png

    Thanks for reading all of this 😄

    The match in the screenshots is the same as from this bug report, so the following files are already uploaded to the SI OwnCloud:
    autohoratio FM24 Throw-in Taker Issue.fm
    autohoratio FM24 Throw-in Taker Issue match_recording.rec
    autohoratio FM24 Throw-in Taker Issue Match.pkm

    I've also uploaded these files from the second match to the SI OwnCLoud:

    autohoratio FM24 IWB Behaviour.pkm
    autohoratio FM24 IWB Behaviour match_recording.rec

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Yeah, the invert trigger for IWBs is when a midfielder or forward controls the ball, that has carried over from FM23 (and probably earlier). Would be neat if it were a changeable option.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    @Zachary Whyte this video might be useful as well if the match engine team haven't seen it yet, particularly the out of possession phase - at 10:10 in the video Maresca talks about how the full back will stay inverted when the team loses the ball to try and win it back aggressively, until/unless the opponent can string together 5+ passes.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 09/12/2023 at 15:43, autohoratio said:

    @Zachary Whyte this video might be useful as well if the match engine team haven't seen it yet, particularly the out of possession phase - at 10:10 in the video Maresca talks about how the full back will stay inverted when the team loses the ball to try and win it back aggressively, until/unless the opponent can string together 5+ passes.

     

    They should fix the IWB(A) they should adopt the Girona way of doing it, the left back becomes a LAM with the ball very offensive and he attacks the box while in FM the difference between IWB(a) and support is very little, they should become much more unique, the IWB(S) drops in DM strata, the attack one in AM strata the same as SV(A) who attack the box while IWB(a) in fm 24 is useless same as support for attacking the box very limited

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


×
×
  • Create New...